A Consideration of Team Development Life Cycles Using Behavioural Paradigm Models and Communication Analysis

  • Roger Stewart


Many organisations are adopting structural forms, such as Flat, Federalist or Decentralised in order to be more reactive to market conditions and more efficient in their operations. An integral part of these structural changes is the creation of teams whose effectiveness is perceived to be a critical part of the efficiency of the organisation as a whole. The understanding of team behaviour is therefore an important part in the restructuring and management of the process of change.


Team Member Maturation Stage Team Development Communication Pattern Informal Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich. J. M., and Donnelley, J. H., 1994, 8th ed., Organizations: Behaviour, Structure, Processes, Irwin, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Homans, G., 1951, The Human Group, Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
  3. Stewart, R. W., 1994, Behaviour and Communication Analysis of command and control teams, Journal of Naval Science, 20: 164–174.Google Scholar
  4. Tuckman, B. W., Jensen, M. A., 1977, Stages of small group development revisited, Group and Organisation Studies, 2:419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information SystemsKingston UniversityKingston upon Thames, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations