High Performance Teams and their Development
Trends towards the use of less hierarchical structures in organisations have been evident in the 1990s. Moss-Kanter (1984) has advocated empowerment, commercial organisations have de-layered in search of cost savings, and matrix, project and team based methods of organising staff have been examined. The increasingly competitive environment has put pressure on organisations to reduce the number of their employees, and to obtain the best performance from those that remain. This would-be maximisation of effectiveness has heightened interest in the mechanisms of group performance, and the means of achieving synergy with groups which will enhance the efforts of the individual members of the group, and also achieve more than the sum of their parts.
KeywordsTeam Member Sport Team Commercial Organisation Senior Management Team Team Role
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adair, J., 1979 Action Centred Leadership, Gower: London.Google Scholar
- Beer, S., 1994 Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity, Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
- Belbin, R.M., 1981 Management Teams: Why they Succeed or Fail, Butterworth: London.Google Scholar
- Beibin, R.M., 1993 Team Roles at Work Butterworth-Heineman, London.Google Scholar
- Blake, R.B., and Mouton, J.S., 1964 The Managerial Grid Gulf.Google Scholar
- Herzberg, F.W., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B.B., 1959 The Motivation to Work, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Moss-Kanter, R., 1984 The Change Masters, George Allan and Unwin: London.Google Scholar
- Owen, H., 1996 Creating Top Flight Teams, Kogan Page: London.Google Scholar
- Reavill, L.R.P., 1995 “Team Management for High Technology Projects”, Management of Technology Conference, Aston University, April, pp. 535-37.Google Scholar