Trace Element Levels in Children and Adolescents from Selected Regions of Slovakia

  • A. Béderová
  • A. Brtková
  • T. Magálová
  • K. Babinská


Essential trace elements, zinc, copper and selenium, are important for optimal function of specific biochemical reactions. They influence the immune system and as a component of enzymes, they are involved in redox reactions. They may be important in development of cardio-vascular diseases and cancer. This hypothesis is supported by results of epidemiological and ecological studies. Increased levels of zinc and copper were observed in women with breast cancer (1,2), in lung cancer and in and stomach cancer (3). Increased levels of copper increase the risk of cardio-vascular diseases (CVD) (4,5). Similarly, decreased values of selenium under 0.57 μmol/L represent a risk for development of cancer and or CVD (6–9). Aim of this study was to obtain serum levels of zinc, copper and selenium in our children and adolescent population, and to assess the possible risk.


Breast Cancer Reference Range Stomach Cancer Serum Zinc Essential Trace Element 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. Cavallo, M. Gerber, E. Marubini et al., Cancer, 67, 783–745, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Niskanen, J. Marniemi, O. Piironen, Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 59, 340–343, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Knekt, A. Aromaa, J. Maatela et al., Br.J.Cancer, 65, 292–296, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. T. Salonen, G. Alfthan, J. K. Huttenen, P. Puska, Amer. J. Epidem, 120, 342–349, (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Overvad, D. Wang, J. Olsen et al., Amer. J. Epidem. 137, 409–414, (1993).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. W. Comstock, T. L. Bush, K. Helzlsouer, Am. J. Epidem. 135, 115–121, (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Iyengar, J. Woitiez, Clin. Chem. 34, 474–481, (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Reunanen, P. Knekt, R. K. Aoran, Amer. J. Epidem. 136, 1082–1090, (1992).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. T. Salonen, R. Salonen, H. Korpela et al., Am.J.Epidem. 134, 268–276, (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.B. Jacobson, G. Lockitch, Clin. Chem. 34, 709–714, (1988).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Šimek, Physiological values in human being, 2nd ed., Avicenum, Praha (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. J. M. Malvy, J. Arnaud, B. Burtschy et al., Eur. J. Epidemiol 3, 155–161, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Magalová, A. Brtková, I. Kajaba et al., Ès. Gastroent. Vý. 44, 315–321, (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Laitinen, E. Vuori, S. Dahlstrom et al., Pediatric Res. 25, 323–326, (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. J. Kok, C. M. Van Duijn, A. Hofman et al., Am. J. Epidem, 128, 352–359, (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Marano, A. Spagnolo, G. Morisi et all., J.TraceElem.Elec.Health Dis. 5, 59–61, (1991).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. G. Medhin, U. Ewald, T. Tuvemo, Upsala J. Med. Sci. 93, 57–62, (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Béderová
    • 1
  • A. Brtková
    • 1
  • T. Magálová
    • 1
  • K. Babinská
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of NutritionBratislavaSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations