Advertisement

Serum Trace Elements (Cu, Zn, Se, and Al) and Thiobarbituric Acid Reactants (TBARS) in Hemodialysis Patients from Batna (Algeria)

  • B. Lachili
  • J. Arnaud
  • C. Coudray
  • N. Zama
  • A. M. Roussel
  • C. Benlatreche
  • A. Favier

Abstract

In patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), serum zinc (1,2) and selenium (2–4) concentrations generally decrease, whereas serum copper (1,5) and aluminum (1,6) concentrations increase. These variations could be related to the low dietary intake due to protein restriction or poor appetite, decreased gastrointestinal absorption, decreased bioavailabillity due to drug interactions, inflammatory process and interaction with dialysis membrane (7,8). On the other hand, trace element status variations in CRF patients could explain biochemical and clinical manifestations occuring in these patients. Hypogeusia, taste and smell dysfunctions, hypogonadism, hair-loss, dermatitis, anemia, fatigue, immunodepression, atherosclerosis, osteomalacia and encephalopathy could be in part explained by zinc and selenium deficiencies or aluminum intoxication (6–11). The decrease of serum zinc and selenium concentrations associated to the increase of serum aluminum concentrations in CRF patients could contribute to the high level of thiobarbituric acid reactants (TBARS) reported in hemodialyzed patients (2,12,13). Influence of hemodialysis session have not been extensively investigated (1,5,10). Serum zinc and selenium concentrations increase (1,5,10), whereas serum copper and aluminum concentrations remain unchanged (1,5).

Keywords

Selenium Concentration Aluminum Concentration Serum Zinc Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Serum Selenium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Allain, H.E. Thebaud, L. Dupouet, P. Coville, M. Pisant, J. Spiesser and P. Alquier, Nouvelle Presse Méd. 7, 92–96 (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.J. Richard, J. Arnaud, C. Jurkovitz, T. Hachache, H. Meftahi, F. Laporte, M. Forêt, A. Favier and D. Cordonnier, Nephron 57, 10–15 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.W. Foote, L.J. Hinks and B. Lloyd, Clin. Chim. Acta 164, 323–328 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.D. Saint-Georges, D.J. Bonnefont, B.A. Bourely, M.C. Jaudon, P. Cereze, C. Gard, J.C. Chaumiel and CL. d’Auzac, Nouvelle Presse Méd. 18, 1195–1198 (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Agenet, C.C. Brugere and J.P. Reynier, Ann. Biol. Clin. 47, 493–496 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.A. Romero, J.A. Navarro, B. Rodriguez-Iturbe, R. Garcia, O.E. Parra and V.A. Granadillo. Trace Elem. Med. 7, 176–181 (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Atkin-Thor, B.W. Goddard, J. O’Nion, R.L Stephen and W.J. Kolff, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 31, 1948–1951 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Richard and M.C. Jaudon, in Les oligoéléments en nutrition et thérapeutique, P. Chappuis and A. Favier, eds., Tec et Doc, Paris, pp 325–341 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.D. Antoniou, R.J. Shalhoub, T. Sudhakar and J.C. Smith, Lancet 2, 895–898 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Milly, L. Wit, C. Diskin and R. Tulley, Nephron 61, 139–144 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.R. Wills and J. Savory, Lancet 2, 29–33 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.L. Paul, N.D. Sali, T. Soni, J.L. Poignet, A. Lindenbaum, N.K. Man, N. Moatti and D. Raichvarg, Nephron 64, 106–109(1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Schettler, E. Wieland, R. Verwiebe, P. Schuff-Werner, F. Scheler and M. Oellerich, Nephron 67, 42–47 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    J.A. Navarro, O.E. Parra, R. Garcia, B. Rodriguez-Iturbe, V.A. Granadillo, V. Iyengar and J. Woittiez, Clin. Chem. 34, 474–481 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Off J. Eur. Comm. C202, 5-8 (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    S.M. Pilch and F. R. Senti, Assessment of the zinc nutritional status of the U.S. population based on data collected in the second national health and nutrition examination survey, Life Science Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    P. Van Dael and H. Deelstra, Internat. J. Vit. Nutr. Res. 63, 312–316 (1993).Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    B.H. Barbour, M. Bischel and D.E. Abrams, Nephron 8, 455–462 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Lachili
    • 1
  • J. Arnaud
    • 2
  • C. Coudray
    • 2
  • N. Zama
    • 3
  • A. M. Roussel
    • 2
  • C. Benlatreche
    • 4
  • A. Favier
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculté de MédecineUniversité de BatnaBatnaAlgérie
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Biochimie CCHUGGrenoble cedex 9France
  3. 3.Service d’HémodialyseCHU Benflis TouhamiBatnaAlgérie
  4. 4.INES.SM, ConstantineConstantineAlgérie

Personalised recommendations