Advertisement

Technology, Theory, and Analysis

Using Remote Sensing as a Tool for Middle-Range Theory Building in Maritime and Nautical Archaeology
  • Richard J. Anuskiewicz
Part of the The Springer Series in Underwater Archaeology book series (SSUA)

Abstract

This paper is presented to provide some guidance to the archaeologists working underwater contemplating using geophysical-prospecting data as a tool for middle-range theory building in maritime and nautical archaeology. The methodology and data presented herein are based on archaeological research conducted on and around St. Catherines Island, Georgia, and focus on the use of magnetometer remote sensing. The research objectives were basically threefold: first, to develop a historic maritime model for St. Catherines Island; second, to test this model by conducting comprehensive maritime and nautical archaeological studies of the waterways adjacent to and contiguous to the island; and third, to develop a correlation between remote sensing signatures and the archaeological context for middle-range theory building. This presentation will specifically discuss the methodological approach used to develop a maritime model and how the model used nautical archaeology in middle-range theory building for St. Catherines Island.

Keywords

Historical Archaeology American Archaeology Maritime Archaeology Proton Magnetometer Wreck Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anuskiewicz, R.J., 1982, Site Reconstruction and Survey Methodology in a Blackwater Environment (ms. on file). U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
  2. Anuskiewicz, R.J., 1985, Three Dimensional Magnetometer Characterization and Marine Magnetic Distributional Analysis of the Hillsboro Beach Shipwreck: The Search for the Gil Blas, a 19th-century Spanish Brig. Paper presented to the Broward County Historical Commission, Marine Archaeology Advisory Council, Ft. Lauderdale.Google Scholar
  3. Anuskiewicz, R. J. 1989, A Study of Maritime and Nautical Sites Associated with St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Tennessee. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  4. Binford, L.R. (ed.), 1977, For Theory Building in Archaeology. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  5. Binford, L.R. (ed.), Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Clausen, C.J., and Arnold, J.B., III, 1975, A Magnetometer Survey with Electronic Positioning Control and Calculator-plotter System. International journal of Nautical Archaeology 4(2): 1–88.Google Scholar
  7. Delgado, J.P., Murphy, L., and Kelly, R., 1984, Shipwreck Survey of Portion of Ocean Beach, Golden State National Recreation Area, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  8. Garrison, E.G., 1989, A Diachronic Study of Some Historical and Natural Factors Links to Shipwreck Patterns in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Paper presented at the First Joint Archaeological Congress, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  9. Garrison, E.G., and Bray, R.T., 1976, Archaeological Investigations at George Washington Carver National Monument. Report prepared by the American Archaeology Division: Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri. Submitted to National Park Service, Midwest Region.Google Scholar
  10. Gearhart, R.L., 1988a, Cultural Resources Magnetometer Survey and Great Highway/Ocean Beach Seawall Project, San Francisco, California (ms. on file). San Francisco Clean Water Program, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Gearhart, R.L., 1988b, Marine Magnetometer Survey of a Proposed Sand Borrow and Sand Transfer Site Indian Rocks Beach Nourishment Project, Pinellas County, Florida (ms. on file). Pinellas County Board of Commissioners, Clearwater, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Hayden, B., and Cannon, A., 1984, The Structure of Material Systems: Ethnoarchaeology in the Maya Highlands. Society of American Archaeology Papers No. 3.Google Scholar
  13. Muckelroy, K., 1978, Maritime Archaeology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Schiffer, M.B., 1976, Behavioral Archaeology. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  15. Thomas, D.H., 1983a, The Archaeology of Monitor Valley: 1. Epistemology. Anthropology Papers American Museum of Natural History 58(1).Google Scholar
  16. Thomas, D.H., 1983b, The Archaeology of Monitor Valley: 2. Gatecliff Shelter. Anthropology Papers American Museum of Natural History 59(1).Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, D.H., 1986, Contemporary Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology in America. In edited by D.J. Meltzer, D.D. Fowler, and J.A. Sabloff, American Archaeology Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology 1935–1985, pp. 237–276. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, D.H., 1987, The Archaeology of Mission Santa Catalina de Guale: 1. Search and Discovery. Anthropology Papers American Museum of Natural History 63(2).Google Scholar
  19. Thomas, D.H., 1988, St. Catherines: An Island in Time. Georgia History and Culture Series. Georgia Endowment for the Humanities, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  20. Thomas, D.H., and Larsen, C.S., 1979, The Anthropology of St. Catherines Islands: The Refuge-Deptford Mortuary Complex. Anthropology Papers American Museum of Natural History 1(56).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Anuskiewicz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations