Advertisement

Paradigm for Two-Photon Cascade Intensity Correlation Experiments

  • Georg M. Meyer
  • Girish S. Agarwal
  • Hu Huang
  • Marlan O. Scully
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 358)

Abstract

Quantum electrodynamics is a spectacularly successful theory, nowhere are its successes more numerous than in modern quantum optics. However, fully quantum field theoretical calculations are frequently quite involved, and it is therefore important to have and perfect paradigms which provide physical insight, thus helping us to decide which calculations to do. A case in point is the Welton treatment of the Lamb shift via heuristic “vacuum-fluctuations” arguments.1

Keywords

Beam Splitter Quantum Electrodynamic Lamb Shift Atomic Parameter Quantum Eraser 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 74:1157 (1948).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.D. Franson, Phys. Rev. Lett 62:2205 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. J.D. Franson, Phys. Rev. Lett 67:290 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    J.D. Franson, Phys. Rev. A 44:4552 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    P.G. Kwiat, W.A. Vareka, C.K. Hong, H. Nathel, and R.Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 41:2910 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Z.Y. Ou, X.Y. Zou, L.J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett 65:321 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    J.G. Rarity and P.R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. A 45:2052 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    C.K. Hong, Z.Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett 59:2044 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Z.Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett 61:54 (1988).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Z.Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett 62:2941 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.
    R.A. Campos, B.E.A. Saleh, and M.C. Teich, Phys. Rev. A 42:4127 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    M.H. Rubin and Y.H. Shih, Phys. Rev. A 45:8138 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    M.O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy. Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press (to be published).Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    H. Huang and J.H. Eberly, J. Mod. Optics 40:915 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    M.O. Scully and K. Driihl, Phys. Rev. A 25:2208 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    T.S. Larchuk, R.A. Campos, J.G. Rarity, P.R. Tapster, E. Jakeman, B.E.A. Saleh, and M.C. Teich, Phys. Rev. Lett 70:1603 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    U. Eichmann, J.C. Bergquist, J.J. Bollinger, J.M. Gilligan, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and M.G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett 70:2359 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg M. Meyer
    • 1
    • 3
  • Girish S. Agarwal
    • 2
  • Hu Huang
    • 1
  • Marlan O. Scully
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.School of PhysicsUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Max-Planck-Institut für QuantenoptikGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations