Skip to main content

Tokamak Disruption Detection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical MATLAB Deep Learning

Abstract

Tokamaks are fusion machines that are under development to produce baseload power. Baseload power is the power that is produced 24/7 and provides the base for powering the electric grid. The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is an international project that will produce net power from a Tokamak. Net power means the Tokamak produces more energy than it consumes. Consumption includes heating the plasma, controlling it, and powering all the auxiliary systems needed to maintain the plasma. It will allow researchers to study the physics of the Tokamak which will hopefully lead the way toward operational machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.M.M. Al-Husari, B. Hendel, I.M. Jaimoukha, E.M. Kasenally, D.J.N. Limebeer, and A.Portone. Vertical stabilisation of Tokamak Plasmas. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, December 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbara Cannas, Gabriele Murgia, A Fanni, Piergiorgio Sonato, Augusto Montisci, and M.K. Zedda. Dynamic Neural Networks for Prediction of Disruptions in Tokamaks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 284, 01 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wroblewski D. and et al. Tokamak disruption alarm based on neural network model of high-beta limit. Nuclear Fusion, 37(725), 11 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Julian Kates-Harbeck, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, and William Tang. Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning. Nature, 568:526–531, April 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Liang and JET EFDA Contributors. Overview of Edge Localized Modes Control in Tokamak Plasma. Technical Report Preprint of Paper for Fusion Science and Technology, JET-EFDA, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.A. Ratta, J..Vega, A. Murari, the EUROfusion MSTTeam, and JET Contributors. AUG-JET cross-tokamak disruption predictor. In 2nd IAEA TM, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elizabeth Rosenthal. Artificial Intelligence Approach Points to Bright Future for Fusion Energy. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.O. Sayer, Y.K.M. Peng, J.C. Wesley, S.C. Jardin, CA General Atomics, San Diego, and NJ Princeton Univ. ITER disruption modeling using TSC (Tokamak Simulation Code). Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 11 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luigi. Scibile. Non-linear control of the plasma vertical position in a tokamak. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to APress Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paluszek, M., Thomas, S., Ham, E. (2022). Tokamak Disruption Detection. In: Practical MATLAB Deep Learning. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-7912-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics