Skip to main content

Agile Performance Improvement

  • Chapter
Agile Performance Improvement

Abstract

Agile performance improvement is a way of thinking and a work approach that blends the best of human performance technology (HPT) and Agile. As a way of thinking, agile performance improvement finds ample common ground within the two principles-based approaches. As a work approach, agile performance improvement leverages methods and practices that ensure a focus on delivering a continuous stream of customer value while optimizing collaboration and performance among the product owner, the development team, and the customer.

There is a pleasure in philosophy, and a lure even in the mirages of metaphysics, which every student feels until the coarse necessities of physical existence drag him from the heights of thought into the mart of economic strife and gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy (New York: Washington Square Press, 1961).

  2. 2.

    “Responding to change over following a plan” is one of the four values of the Agile Manifesto.

  3. 3.

    Cumulative flow is a set of time-based metrics that look at how long it takes work items to proceed through the development cycle. It also counts how many work items sit in each phase of the cycle. The term is commonly used in software engineering and lean product development. Additionally, Cumulative Flow will be my rap name if I ever return to the mic.

  4. 4.

    I say “they” because in Agile the customer/client decides. In HPT, the consultant is considered a partner of the client, and they make decisions together. This is one of the more significant points of incompatibility between HPT and Agile. Overall I prefer the way Agile does it, because it seems more realistic to concede overall authority to the customer.

  5. 5.

    Robert F. Mager, Preparing Instructional Objectives (Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers, 1962).

  6. 6.

    Letter to Harrison Blake, November 16, 1857.

  7. 7.

    This basic critique of the traditional performance appraisal goes back decades. Thomas F. Gilbert touches on the topic in his autobiography Human Incompetence, and it is a legitimate school of thought among current-day HR consultants.

  8. 8.

    Six Sigma and Total Quality Management (TQM ) were popular quality approaches in the 1980s and 1990s. They were supplanted by concepts such as Lean and Agile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 CA

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, B. (2015). Agile Performance Improvement. In: Agile Performance Improvement. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0892-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics