Physical Interpretation of Electron Correlation in the Local-Density Approximation

  • Viraht Sahni
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 337)

Abstract

In this paper we explain how electron correlations due to the Pauli exclusion principle and Coulomb’s law are represented within the local-density approximation (LDA) of Hohenberg-Kohn-Sham density-functional theory[1] (DFT). The description[2,3] of how electrons are correlated in the LDA is arrived at via the work formalism[4,5] for the determination of electronic structure due to Harbola and Sahni, and surpasses our current understanding of these correlations which is based on Kohn-Sham theory. In the description of the LDA via Kohn-Sham theory[1] each point of an inhomogeneous electronic density system is approximated as being homogeneous, but with a density corresponding to the local value at that point. In other words, the correlations between electrons as described by this picture are those of the uniform electron gas. Equivalently, the wavefunction for the non-uniform electron gas system at each electron position corresponds to the wavefunction of a uniform electron gas with a density equal to the local value at that position. This description of the LDA leads naturally to the criticism which questions the efficacy of employing homogeneous electron gas wavefunctions in regions of space where the potential is rapidly varying and in the classically forbidden region where the wavefunction is exponential. On the other hand, the results of application[6] of the LDA are remarkably accurate, considerably more so than can be expected on the basis of the above description. Are the LDA results then simply fortuitious? The answer to this question is negative, since as will be explained, the LDA in fact goes beyond uniform electron gas theory and explicitly incorporates the non-uniformity of the electronic density in its representation of electron correlations. The LDA wavefunction thus incorporates to a significant degree the physics apropos to regions where the potential is varying, and this thereby is the reason for the accuracy of the results achieved. Furthermore, the above mentioned criticism, based on an erroneous understanding of electron correlations in the approximation, is consequently invalid.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R.M. Dreizler and E.K.U. Gross, Density-Functional Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. R.G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
  3. N.H. March, Electron Density Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Academic, London, 1992), and references therein.Google Scholar
  4. [2]
    V. Sahni and M. Slamet, Phys. Rev. B. 48, 1910 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [3]
    M. Slamet and V. Sahni, Phys. Rev. B. 45, 4013 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [4]
    M.K. Harbola and V. Sahni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 489 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Sahni and M.K. Harbola, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 24, 569 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. M.K. Harbola and V. Sahni, J. Chem. Ed. 70, 920 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [5]
    M.K. Harbola, M. Slamet and V. Sahni, Phys. Lett. A. 157, 60 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Slamet, V. Sahni and M.K. Harbola, Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994).Google Scholar
  11. [6]
    R.O. Jones and O. Gunnarsson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 689 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [7]
    V. Sahni, K.-P. Bohnen and M.K. Harbola, Phys. Rev. 37, 1895 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [8]
    Y. Wang, J.P. Perdew, J.A. Chevary, L.D. Macdonald, and S.H. Vosko, Phys. Rev. A. 41, 78 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [9]
    V. Sahni, Y. Li and M.K. Harbola, Phys. Rev. A. 45, 1434 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [10]
    C.F. Fischer, The Hartree-Fock Method for Atoms (Wiley, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
  16. [11]
    M. Slamet and V. Sahni, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 25, 235 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Slamet and V. Sahni, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 26, 333 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viraht Sahni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsBrooklyn College of the City University of New YorkBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations