Advertisement

Differential Gene Expression in Cultured Human Langerhans Cells in Response to Phagocytic Stimulation

  • Josef Unger
  • William Phares
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 417)

Abstract

In order to identify genes whose differential expression in Langerhans cells (LC) is increased by a potent, specific stimulus that is associated with the antigen-processing and -presenting activity of these cells, we have begun the analysis of phagocytic stimulation of freshly isolated human LC in culture (cLC) using zymosan particles. Previously it has been shown that cLC actively take up zymosan, and that phagocytosis of these particles is mediated by the mannose/ß-glucan receptor(s)1. Genes that are preferentially expressed in cLC following phagocytic stimulation were identified by mRNA Representational Difference Analysis (RDA)2,3 and DNA sequence analysis of cloned RDA difference products (DP). In order to address the question of cell type-specific molecular activation patterns, a similar set of experiments with monocytes cultivated with GM-CSF and IL-4 (MoDC) was included in this analysis. In total, more than 150 recombinant plasmid clones containing DP were isolated, sequenced and compared with primate sequence databases and EST databases.

Keywords

Southern Blot Analysis Differential Gene Expression Zymosan Particle Dendritic Cell Culture Fresh Surgical Specimen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reis e Sousa, C., Stahl, P. D. and J. M. Austyn. 1993. Phagocytosis of antigens by Langerhans cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 178: 509–519Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Hubank, D. G. Schatz. 1994. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nue. Acids Res. 22: 5640–5648Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lisitsyn, N., Lisitsyn, N. and M. Wigler. 1993. Cloning the difference between two complex genomes. Science 259: 946–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jürgens, M., Wollenberg, A., Hanaus, D., de la Salle, H. and T. Bieber. 1995. Activation of human epidermal Langerhans cells by engagement of the high affinity receptor for IgE, FccRI. J. Immunol. 155: 5184–5189.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sallusto, F. and A. Lanzavecchia. 1994. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor a. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1109–1118.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melby, P.C., Damell, B.J. and V.V. Tryon. 1993. Quantitative measurement of human cytokine gene expression by polymerase chain reaction. J. Immunol. Meth. 159: 235–244.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rabinovitch, M. 1995. Professional and non-professional phagocytes: an introduction. Trends Cell Biology 5: 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jesaitis, A.J. 1995. Structure of human phagocyte cytochrome b and its relationship to microbicidal superoxide production. J. Immunol 155: 3286–3288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsunaga Y., Saibara T., Kido H. and N. Katunuma. 1993. Participation of Cathepsin B in processing of antigen presentation to MHC class II. FEBS 324: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef Unger
    • 1
  • William Phares
    • 1
  1. 1.Genetics DepartmentSandoz ForschungsinstitutViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations