Advertisement

The Power of the Myth of Self-Interest

  • Dale T. Miller
  • Rebecca K. Ratner
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Self-interest is the cardinal human motive, or so many of the most influential theories of human behavior would have us believe. Theories as diverse as evolutionary biology, neo-classical economics, behaviorism, and psychoanalysis all assume that people actively and single-mindedly pursue their self-interest, whether it be embodied in reproductive fitness, utility maximization, reinforcement, or wish fulfillment (Schwartz, 1986). On the other hand, much of the most interesting social science research of the last twenty years points to inadequacy of self-interest models of behavior (for reviews, see Batson, 1991; Etzioni, 1988; Kohn, 1990; Lerner, 1980; Mansbridge, 1990; Sears & Funk, 1990; Sen, 1977; Tyler & Dawes, 1993). We now know that people often care more about the fairness of the procedures they are subjected to than about the material outcomes these procedures yield (Tyler, 1990), that they often care more about their group’s collective outcomes than about their personal outcomes (Dawes, van de Kragt & Orbell, 1988), and that their attitudes toward public policies are often shaped more by their values and ideologies than by the impact these policies have on their material well-being (Sears & Funk, 1990).

Keywords

Minority Student Vested Interest Vote Behavior Neoclassical Economic Flat Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brunk, G. G. (1980). The impact of rational participation models on voting attitudes. Public Choice, 35, 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R. D., & Maass, A. (1982). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347–364.Google Scholar
  6. Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C. & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83–97.Google Scholar
  8. DeTocqueville, A. (1835/1969). Democracy in America. J. P. Mayer (Ed.), G. Lawrence, trans. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method, W.D. Halls, trans. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fazio, R. H., Effrein, E. A. & Falender, V. J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldman, S. (1984). Economic self-interest and the vote: Evidence and meaning. Political Behavior, 6, 229–252.Google Scholar
  13. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  17. Green, D. P., & Cowden, J. A. (1992). Who protests: Self-interest and white opposition to busing. Journal of Politics, 54, 471–496.Google Scholar
  18. Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T. & Lerner, M. J. (1995). Symbolic threat in helping situations: The “exchange fiction.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  19. Kohn, A. (1990). The brighter side of human nature. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Lau, R. R., Sears, D. O. & Jessor, T. (1990). Fact or artifact revisited: Survey instrument effects and pocketbook politics. Political Behavior, 12, 217–242.Google Scholar
  22. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T. & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 134–160 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science (Edited by D. Cartwright), New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  25. Maass, A., Clark, R. D. III. & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differentially ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology; 12, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.), (1990). Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, D. T. (1975). Personal deserving versus justice for others. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, D. T. (1977). Personal deserving versus justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1995). Unpublished data. Princeton University.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, D. T., & Vidmar, N. (1981). The role of justice in punishment reactions: A social psychological analysis. In M. J. Lerner and S. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145–172 ). New York: Plenum Press. NoelleGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumann, E. (1986). The spiral of silence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Perloff, R. (1987). Self-interest and personal responsibility redux. American Psychologist, 42, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 28–45.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, B. (1986). The battle for human nature. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1990). Self-interest in Americans’ political opinions. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 147–170 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 24, pp. 2–91 ), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sears, D. O., & Lau, R. R. (1983). Indicating apparently self-interested politicalGoogle Scholar
  40. preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 223–252.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
  42. Sierra Club v. Morton, No. 70–34. (9th Cir, 1972 ).Google Scholar
  43. Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snyder, M. (1993). Basic research and practical problems: The promise of a “functional” personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 251–264.Google Scholar
  45. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1990). Who helps and why? The psychology of AIDS volunteerism. In S. Spacapan and S. Oskamp (Eds.), Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 213–239 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Stein, R. M. (1990). Economic voting for governor and U.S. Senator: The electoral consequences of federalism. Journal of Politics, 52, 29–53.Google Scholar
  47. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 171–179 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tyler, T. R., & Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 87–108 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., & Lind, E. A. (1993) Preferring, choosing, and evaluating dispute resolution procedures: The psychological antecedents of feelings and choices. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  50. Vidmar, N., & Miller, D. T. (1980). Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law and Society Review, L (3), 401–439.Google Scholar
  51. Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale T. Miller
    • 1
  • Rebecca K. Ratner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations