Advertisement

Motor Correlates of Vocal Diversity in Songbirds

  • Roderick A. Suthers
  • Franz Goller
Part of the Current Ornithology book series (CUOR, volume 14)

Abstract

Oscine songbirds invest a substantial amount of time producing song, which has important roles in male-male competition and in attracting and stimulating a mate (Howard, 1920), as well as in species (Becker, 1982) and individual (Falls, 1982) recognition. Their diverse and often elaborate songs have placed them at the interface of neurobiology, behavior, and ecology as excellent subjects in which to study vocal communication. Toward this end, neurobiologists have made important advances in understanding the neural basis of vocal learning (e.g., Doupe, 1993; Arnold, 1992) and the central control of song production (e.g., Yu and Margoliash, 1996; Vu et al., 1994) and behavioral ecologists have gained new insights into the perceptual significance and communicative functions of song (e.g., Searcy and Yasukawa, 1996).

Keywords

Zebra Finch Vocal Tract Song Type Repertoire Size Great Reed Warbler 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo, R., Glynn, C., and Lundberg, A., 1990, Singing rate and female attraction in the Pied Flycatcher: an experiment, Anim. Behay. 39: 601–603.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, S. E., and Goller, F., 1995, Syringeal muscle activity during song in Brown-headed Cowbirds, Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 21: 964.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, S. E., and Suthers, R. A., 1994, Lateralization and motor stereotypy of song production in the Brown-headed Cowbird, J. Neurobiol. 25: 1154–1166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, D. R., and Strong, W. J., 1985, A model for the synthesis of natural sounding vowels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78: 58–69.Google Scholar
  5. Ames, P. L., 1971, The morphology of the syrinx in passerine birds, Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 37: 1–194.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, A. P., 1992, Developmental plasticity in neural circuits controlling birdsong: sexual differentiation and the neural basis of learning, J. Neurobiol. 23: 1506–1528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, M. C., Bjerke, T. K., Lampe, H., and Espmark, Y., 1986, Sexual response of female Great Tits to variation in size of males’ song repertoires, Am. Nat. 128: 491–498.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, M. C., Bjerke, T. K., Lampe, H. U., and Espmark, Y. O., 1987, Sexual response of female Yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes, Anim. Behay. 35: 395–401.Google Scholar
  9. Baker, M. C., Tracy, T. T., and Miyasato, L. E., 1996, Gargle vocalizations of Black-capped Chickadees: test of repertoire and video stimuli, Anim. Behay. 52: 1171–1175.Google Scholar
  10. Bech, C., Johansen, K., and Nicol, S., 1988, Gas exchange during high-frequency ventilation in the Pigeon (Columba livia), Acta Physiol. Scand. 132: 217–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker, P. H., 1982, The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds, in: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1 ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 213–252.Google Scholar
  12. Bernard, D. J., Eens, M., and Ball, G. F., 1996, Age-and behavior-related variation in volumes of song control nuclei in male European Starlings, J. Neurobiol. 30: 329–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boughey, M. J., and Thompson, N. S., 1981, Song variety in the Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum), Z. Tierpsychol. 56: 47–58.Google Scholar
  14. Brackenbury, J. H., 1971, Airflow dynamics in the avian lung as determined by direct and indirect methods, Respir. Physiol. 13: 319–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brackenbury, J. H., 1972, Physical determinants of air flow pattern within the avian lung, Respir. Physiol. 15: 384–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brackenbury, J. H., 1973, Respiratory mechanics in the bird, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 44A: 599–611.Google Scholar
  17. Brackenbury, J. H., 1987, Ventilation of the lung-air sac system, in: Bird Respiration, Vol. 1 ( T. J. Seller, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 39–69.Google Scholar
  18. Brackenbury, J. H., 1989, Functions of the syrinx and the control of sound production, in: Form and Function in Birds, Vol. 4 ( A. S. King and J. McCelland, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 193–220.Google Scholar
  19. Brenowitz, E. A., and Kroodsma, D. E., 1996, The neuroethology of birdsong, in: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 285–304.Google Scholar
  20. Brittan-Powell, E. F., Dooling, R. J., Larsen, O. N., and Heaton, J. T., 1997, Mechanisms of vocal production in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 578–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Calder, W. A., 1970, Respiration during song in the Canary (Serinus canaris), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 32: 251–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Catchpole, C. K., 1983, Variation in the song of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to i e attraction and territorial defence, Anim. Behay. 31: 1217–1225.Google Scholar
  23. Catchpole, C. K., 1986, Song repertoires and reproductive success in the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 439–445.Google Scholar
  24. Catchpole, C. K., 1987, Bird song, sexual selection and female choice, Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 94–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Catchpole, C. K., and Leisler, B., 1996, Female Aquatic Warblers (Acrocephalus paludicola) are attracted to playback of longer and more complicated songs, Behaviour 133: 1153–1164.Google Scholar
  26. Catchpole, C. K., Leisler, B., and Dittami, J., 1986, Sexual differences in the responses of captive Great Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) to variation in song structure and repertoire size, Ethology 73: 69–77.Google Scholar
  27. Chappell, M. A., Zuk, M., Kwan, T. H., and Johnsen, T. S., 1995, Energy cost of an avian vocal display: crowing in Red Junglefowl, Anim. Behay. 49: 255–257.Google Scholar
  28. Cranen, B., and Boves, L., 1987, On subglottal formant analysis, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81: 734–746.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cynx, J., Williams, H., and Nottebohm, F., 1990, Timbre discrimination in Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables, J. Comp. Psycho. 104: 303–308.Google Scholar
  30. Dabelsteen, T., 1981, The sound pressure level in the dawn song of the Blackbird, Turdus merula, and a method for adjusting the level in experimental song to the level in natural song, Z. Tierpsychol. 56: 137–149.Google Scholar
  31. Dabelsteen, T., and Pedersen, S. B., 1992, Song features essential for species discrimination and behaviour assessment by male Blackbirds (Turdus merula), Behaviour 121: 259–287.Google Scholar
  32. Dabelsteen, T., and Pedersen, S. B., 1993, Song-based species discrimination and behaviour assessment by female Blackbirds, Turdus merula, Anim. Behay. 45: 759–771.Google Scholar
  33. DeVoogd, T. J., and Nottebohm, F., 1981, Gonadal hormones induce dendritic growth in the adult avian brain, Science 214: 202–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. DeVoogd, T. J., Nixdorf, B., and Nottebohm, F., 1985, Synaptogenesis and changes in synaptic morphology related to acquisition of a new behavior, Brain Res. 329: 304–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. DeVoogd, T. J., Pyskaty, D. J., and Nottebohm, F., 1991, Lateral asymmetries and testosterone-induced changes in the gross morphology of the hypoglossal nucleus in adult Canaries, J. Comp. Neurol. 307: 65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Doupe, A. J., 1993, A neural circuit specialized for vocal learning, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 3: 104–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Eberhardt, L. S., 1994, Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina Wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus), Auk 111: 124–130.Google Scholar
  38. Eberhardt, L. S., 1996, Energy expenditure during singing: a reply to Gaunt et al., Auk 113: 721–723.Google Scholar
  39. Falls, J. B., 1963, Properties of bird song eliciting responses from territorial males, in: Proceedings 13th International Ornithological Congress, pp. 259–271.Google Scholar
  40. Falls, J. B., 1982, Individual recognition by sounds in birds, in: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2 ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 237–278.Google Scholar
  41. Fant, G., 1970, Acoustic Theory of Speech Production, Mouton, Paris.Google Scholar
  42. Fedde, M. R., 1987, Respiratory muscles, in: Bird Respiration, Vol. 1 ( T. J. Seller, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
  43. Fee, M. S., Pearson, B., Mitra, P. P., and Shraiman, B. I., 1996, Some temporal complexity of bird song may arise from nonlinear dynamics of the syrinx, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 22: 153.Google Scholar
  44. Fletcher, N. H., 1988, Bird song—a quantitative acoustic model, J. Theor. Biol. 135: 455–481.Google Scholar
  45. Fletcher, N. H., 1989, Acoustics of bird song—some unresolved problems, Comm. Theor. Biol. 4: 237–251.Google Scholar
  46. Fletcher, N. H., 1992, Acoustic Systems in Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Freeberg, T. M., 1996, Assortative mating in captive cowbirds is predicted by social experience, Anim. Behay. 52: 1129–1142.Google Scholar
  48. Gaunt, A., 1983, An hypothesis concerning the relationship of syringeal structure to vocal abilities, Auk 100: 853–862.Google Scholar
  49. Gaunt, A., 1987, Phonation, in: Bird Respiration, Vol. 1 ( T. J. Seller, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
  50. Gaunt, A., 1988, Interaction of syringeal structure and airflow in avian phonation, in: Acta XIX Congress Internationalis Ornithologici, Vol. 1 ( H. Ouillet, ed.), University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, pp. 915–924.Google Scholar
  51. Gaunt, A., and Gaunt, S. L. L., 1985, Syringeal structure and avian phonation, in: Current Ornithology, Vol. 2 ( R. F. Johnston, ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 213–245.Google Scholar
  52. Gaunt, A., Stein, R. C., and Gaunt, S. L. L., 1973, Pressure and air flow during distress calls of the starling, Sturnus vulgaris (Ayes: Passeriformes), J. Exp. Zoo. 183: 241–262Google Scholar
  53. Gaunt, A., Gaunt, S. L. L., and Casey, R. M., 1982, Syringeal mechanics reassessed: evidence from Streptopelia, Auk 99: 474–494.Google Scholar
  54. Gaunt, A. S., Bucher, T. L., L., Gaunt, S. L. L., and Baptista, L. F., 1996, Is singing costly? Auk 113: 718–721.Google Scholar
  55. Goller, F., and Larsen, O. N., 1997, A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 14787–14791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Goller, F., and Suthers, R. A., 1995a, Contributions of expiratory muscles to song production in Brown Thrashers, in: Nervous Systems and Behaviour. Proceedings 4th International Congress Neuroethology ( M. Burrows, T. Matheson, P. Newland, and H. Schuppe, eds.), Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, p. 334.Google Scholar
  57. Goller, F., and Suthers, R. A., 1995b, Implications for lateralization of bird song from unilateral gating of bilateral motor patterns, Nature 373: 63–66.Google Scholar
  58. Coller, F., and Suthers, R. A., 1996a, Role of syringeal muscles in gating airflow and sound production in singing Brown Thrashers, J. Neurophysiol. 75: 867–876.Google Scholar
  59. Goller, F., and Suthers, R. A., 19966, Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song, J. Neurophysiol. 76: 287–300.Google Scholar
  60. Goller, F., and Suthers, R. A., 1997, Contributions of expiratory abdominal muscles to song production in Brown Thrashers, J. Neurobiol. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  61. Greenewalt, C. H., 1968, Bird Song: Acoustics and Physiology, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  62. Hartley, R. S., 1990, Expiratory muscle activity during song production in the Canary, Respir. Physiol. 81: 177–188.Google Scholar
  63. Hartley, D. H., and Suthers, R. A., 1988, The acoustics of the vocal tract in the Horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hildebrandti, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84: 1201–1213.Google Scholar
  64. Hartley, R. S., and Suthers, R. A., 1989, Airflow and pressure during Canary song: direct evidence for mini-breaths, J. Comp. Physiol. 165: 15–26.Google Scholar
  65. Hartley, R. S., and Suthers, R. A., 1990, Lateralization of syringeal function during song production in the Canary, J. Neurobiol. 21: 1236–1248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hasselquist, D., 1994, Male attractiveness, mating tactics and realized fitness in the polygynous Great Reed Warbler, Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  67. Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S., and von Schantz, T., 1996, Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the Great Reed Warbler, Nature 381: 229–232.Google Scholar
  68. Hausberger, M., Black, J. M., and Richard, J.-P., 1991, Bill opening and sound spectrum in Barnacle Goose loud calls: individuals with ‘wide mouths’ have higher pitched voices, Anim. Behay. 42: 319–322.Google Scholar
  69. Hoese, W. J., and Westneat, M. W., 1996, Biomechanics of cranial kinesis in birds: Testing linkage models in the White-throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis), J. Morphol. 227: 305–320.Google Scholar
  70. Hoi-Leitner, M., Nechtelberger, N., and Hoi, H., 1995, Song rate as a signal for nest site quality in Blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla), Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37: 399–405.Google Scholar
  71. Horn, A. G., Leonard, M. P. L., and Weary, D. M., 1995, Oxygen consumption during crowing by roosters: talk is cheap, Anim. Behay. 50: 1171–1175.Google Scholar
  72. Howard, E., 1920, Territory in Bird Life, Collins and Co., London.Google Scholar
  73. Howard, R. D., 1974, The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mockingbird song (Mimus polyglottos), Evolution 28: 428–438.Google Scholar
  74. Hutchinson, J., 1846, On the capacity of the lungs, and on the respiratory movements, with the view of establishing a precise and easy method of detecting disease by the spirometer, Lancet 1: 630–632.Google Scholar
  75. King, A. P., and West, M. J., 1983, Dissecting cowbird song potency: Assessing a song’s geographic identity and relative appeal, Z. Tierpsychol. 63: 37–50.Google Scholar
  76. King, A. S., 1989, Functional anatomy of the syrinx, in: Form and Function in Birds, Vol. 4 ( A. S. King and J. McLelland, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–192.Google Scholar
  77. King, A. S., and Payne, D. C., 1960, Does the air circulate in the avian lung? Anat. Rec. 136: 223.Google Scholar
  78. Kreutzer, M., Vallet, E., and Doucet, S., 1992, Sexual responses of female Canaries at the onset of song stimuli, Experientia 48: 679.Google Scholar
  79. Kreutzer, M., Vallet, E., and Nagle, L., 1994, Sexual responsiveness of female Canaries to song bout organization, Behaviour 129: 293–305.Google Scholar
  80. Kreutzer, M., Vallet, E., and Nagle, L., 1996, Female Canaries display to songs of early isolated males, Experientia 52: 277–280.Google Scholar
  81. Kroodsma, D. E., 1976, Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song, Science 192: 574–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kroodsma, D. E., 1982, Song repertoires: problems in their definition and use, in: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2 ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 125–146.Google Scholar
  83. Kroodsma, D. E., and Parker, L. D., 1977, Vocal virtuosity in the Brown Thrasher, Auk 94: 783–785.Google Scholar
  84. Lambrechts, M. M., 1988, Great Tit song output is determined both by motivation and by constraints in singing ability: a reply to Weary et al., Anim. Behay. 36: 1244–1246.Google Scholar
  85. Lambrechts, M. M., 1996, Organization of birdsong and constraints on performance, in: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 305–320.Google Scholar
  86. Lambrechts, M. M., and Dhondt, A. A., 1988, The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the Great Tit, Anim. Behay. 36: 327–334.Google Scholar
  87. Lampe, H. M., and Saetre, G. P., 1995, Female Pied Flycatchers prefer males with larger song repertoires, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262: 163–167.Google Scholar
  88. Langmore, N. E., Davies, N. B., Hatchwell, B. J., and Hartley, I. R., 1996, Female song attracts males in the Alpine Accentor, Prunella collaris, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 141–146.Google Scholar
  89. Lemon, R. E., 1965, The song repertoires of cardinals (Richmondena cardinalis) at London, Ontario, Can. J. Zool. 43: 559–569.Google Scholar
  90. Lemon, R. E., 1966, Geographic variation in the song of cardinals, Can. J. Zool. 44: 413–428.Google Scholar
  91. Lemon, R. E., 1973, Nervous control of the syrinx in White-throated Sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis), J. Zool. Lond. 171: 131–140.Google Scholar
  92. Lemon, R. E., and Chatfield, C., 1971, Organization of song in cardinals, Anim. Behay. 19: 1–17.Google Scholar
  93. Lemon, R. E., and Herzog, A., 1969, The vocal behavior of cardinals and Pyrrhuloxias in Texas, Condor 71: 1–15.Google Scholar
  94. Lohr, B. S., 1989, The organization of song elements in the Gray Catbird, M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  95. Luine, V., Nottebohm, F., Harding, C., and McEwen, B. S., 1980, Androgen affects cholinergic enzymes in syringeal motor neurons and muscle, Brain Res. 192: 89–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Marier, P., and Waser, M. S., 1977, Song learning in Canaries, J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho). 91: 1–7.Google Scholar
  97. McCasland, J. S., 1987, Neuronal control of bird song production, J. Neurosci. 7: 23–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. McLelland, J., 1989, Anatomy of the lungs and air sacs, in: Form and Function in Birds, Vol. 4 ( A. S. King and J. McLelland, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 221–279.Google Scholar
  99. Mountjoy, D. J., and Lemon, R. E., 1996, Female choice for complex song in the European Starling: a field experiment, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 65–71.Google Scholar
  100. Nottebohm, F., 1970, Ontogeny of bird song, Science 167: 950–956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Nottebohm, F., 1971, Neural lateralization of vocal control in a passerine bird, J. Exp. Zool. 177: 229–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Nottebohm, F., 1972, The origins of vocal learning, Am. Nat. 106: 116–140.Google Scholar
  103. Nottebohm, F., 1976, Phonation in the Orange-winged Amazon Parrot, Amazona amazonica, J. Comp. Physiol. 108: 157–170.Google Scholar
  104. Nottebohm, F., and Arnold, A. P., 1976, Sexual dimorphism in vocal control area of the songbird brain, Science 194: 211–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Nottebohm, F., and Nottebohm, M. E., 1976, Left hypoglossal dominance in the control of Canary and White-crowned Sparrow song, J. Comp. Physiol. 108: 171–192.Google Scholar
  106. Nottebohm, F., and Nottebohm, M. E., 1978, Relationship between song repertoire and age in the Canary, Serinus canarius, Z. Tierpsychol. 46: 298–305.Google Scholar
  107. Nottebohm, F., Kasparian, S., and Pandazis, C., 1981, Brain space for a learned task, Brain Res. 213: 99–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Nowicki, S., 1987, Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere, Nature 325: 53–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Nowicki, S., and Capranica, R. R., 1986a, Bilateral syringeal coupling during phonation of a songbird, J. Neurosci. 6: 3595–3610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Nowicki, S., and Capranica, R. R., 1986b, Bilateral syringeal interaction in vocal production of an oscine bird sound, Science 231: 1297–1299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Nowicki, S., and Marier, P., 1988, How do birds sing? Music Perception 5: 391–426.Google Scholar
  112. Nowicki, S., Mailer, P., Maynard, A., and Peters, S., 1992, Is the tonal quality of birdsong learned? Evidence from Song Sparrows, Ethology 90: 225–235.Google Scholar
  113. O’Loghlen, A. L., and Rothstein, S. I., 1995, Culturally correct song dialects are correlated with male age and female song preferences in wild populations of Brown-headed Cowbirds, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 251–259.Google Scholar
  114. Peters, S., and Nowicki, S., 1996, Development of tonal quality in birdsong: further evidence from Song Sparrows, Ethology 102: 323–335.Google Scholar
  115. Podos, J., 1996, Motor constraints on vocal development in a songbird, Anim. Behay. 51: 1061–1070.Google Scholar
  116. Podos, J., Sherer, J. K., Peters, S., and Nowicki, S., 1995, Ontogeny of vocal tract movements during song production in Song Sparrows, Anim. Behay. 50: 1287–11296.Google Scholar
  117. Radesäter, T., and Jakobsson, S., 1989, Song rate correlation of replacement territorial Willow Warblers, Phylloscopus trochilus, Omis Scand. 20: 71–73.Google Scholar
  118. Radesäter, T., Jakobsson, S., Andbjer, N., Bylin, A., and Nystrom, K., 1987, Song rate and pair formation in the Willow Warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus, Anim. Behay. 35: 1645–1651.Google Scholar
  119. Read, A. F., and Weary, D. M., 1992, The evolution of bird song: comparative analyses, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 338: 165–187.Google Scholar
  120. Rothenberg, M., 1981, Acoustic interaction between the glottal source and the vocal tract, in: Vocal Fold Physiology ( K. N. Stevens and M. Hirano, eds.), University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 305–328.Google Scholar
  121. Rothenberg, M., 1987, Così Fan Tutte and what it means, or, nonlinear source-tract acoustic interaction in the soprano voice and some implications for the definition of vocal efficiency, in: Laryngeal Function in Phonation and Respiration ( T. Baer, C. Sasaki, and K. S. Harris, eds.), Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, California, pp. 254–269.Google Scholar
  122. Ruan, J., and Suthers, R. A., 1996, Myotopic representation of syringeal muscles in the hypoglossal nucleus of the cowbird, Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 22: 1402.Google Scholar
  123. Scheid, P., and Piiper, J., 1989, Respiratory mechanics and air flow in birds, in: Form and Function in Birds, Vol. 4 ( A. S. King and J. McLelland, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 369–391.Google Scholar
  124. Searcy, W. A., 1992a, Song repertoire and mate choice in birds, Am. Zool. 32: 71–80.Google Scholar
  125. Searcy, W. A., 1992b, Measuring responses of female birds to male song, in: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication ( P. K. McGregor, ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 175–189.Google Scholar
  126. Searcy, W. A., 1996, Sound-pressure levels and song preferences in female Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) (Ayes, Emberizidae), Ethology 102: 187–196.Google Scholar
  127. Searcy, W. A., and Andersson, M., 1986, Sexual selection and the evolution of song, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 507–533.Google Scholar
  128. Searcy, W. A., and Yasukawa, K., 1996, Song and female choice, in: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds ( D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds.), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 454–473.Google Scholar
  129. Seller, T. J., 1979, Unilateral nervous control of the syrinx in Java Sparrows (Padda oryzivora), J. Comp. Physiol. 129: 281–288.Google Scholar
  130. Smith, G. T., Brenowitz, E. A., Wingfield, J. C., and Baptista, L. F., 1995, Seasonal changes in song nuclei and song behavior in Gambel’s White-crowned Sparrows, J. Neurobiol. 28: 114–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Stein, R. C., 1968, Modulation in bird sound, Auk 94: 229–243.Google Scholar
  132. Suthers, R. A., 1990, Contributions to birdsong from the left and right sides of the intact syrinx, Nature 347: 473–477.Google Scholar
  133. Suthers, R. A., 1992, Lateralization of sound production and motor action on the left and right sides of the syrinx during bird song, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Acoustics, IUPAP, Beijing, paper 11–5.Google Scholar
  134. Suthers, R. A., 1994, Variable asymmetry and resonance in the avian vocal tract: a structural basis for individually distinct vocalizations, J. Comp. Physiol A. 175: 457–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Suthers, R. A., and Golfer, F., 1996, Respiratory and syringeal dynamics of song production in Northern Cardinals, in: Nervous Systems and Behaviour. Proceedings 4th International Congress Neuroethology ( M. Burrows, T. Matheson, P. Newland, and H. Schuppe, eds.), Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, p. 333.Google Scholar
  136. Suthers, R. A., Goller, F., and Hartley, R. S., 1996a, Motor stereotypy and diversity in songs of mimic thrushes, J. Neurobiol. 30: 231–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Suthers, R. A., Goller, F., Bermejo, R., Wild, J. M., and Zeigler, H. P., 1996b, Relationship of beak gape to the lateralization, acoustics and motor dynamics of song in Cardinals, in: Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Abstracts 19th Midwinter Research Meeting, p. 158.Google Scholar
  138. Suthers, R. A., and Hartley, R. S., 1990, Effect of unilateral denervation on the acoustic output from each side of the syrinx in singing mimic thrushes, Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 16: 1249.Google Scholar
  139. Suthers, R. A., Goiter, F., and Hartley, R. S., 1994, Motor dynamics of song production by mimic thrushes, J. Neurobiol. 25: 917–936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Suthers, R. A., 1997, Peripheral control and lateralization of birdsong, J. Neurobiol. 33: 632–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Suthers, R. A., 1998, The motor basis of vocal performance in songbirds, in: Causal Mechanisms of Animal Communication, (M. Hauser and M. Konishi, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in press.Google Scholar
  142. Thompson, W. L., and Jane, P. L., 1969, An analysis of catbird song, Jack-Pine Warbler 47: 115–125.Google Scholar
  143. Vallet, E., and Kreutzer, M., 1995, Female Canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases, Anim. Behay. 49: 1603–1610.Google Scholar
  144. Vicario, D. S., 1991a, Organization of the Zebra Finch song control system: II. Functional organization of outputs from nucleus robustus archistriatalis, J. Comp. Neurol. 309: 486–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Vicario, D. S., 1991b, Contributions of syringeal muscles to respiration and vocalization in the Zebra Finch, J. Neurobiol. 22: 63–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Vicario, D. S., 1993, A new brain stem pathway for vocal control in the Zebra Finch song system, NeuroReport 4: 983–986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Vicario, D. S., and Nottebohm, F., 1988, Organization of the Zebra Finch song control system: I. Representation of syringeal muscles in the hypoglossal nucleus, J. Comp. Neural. 271: 346–354.Google Scholar
  148. Vu, E. T., Mazurek, M. E., and Kuo, Y.-C., 1994, Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of Zebra Finches, J. Neurosci. 14: 6924–6934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Warner, R. W., 1972, The anatomy of the syrinx in passerine birds, J. Zool. Lond. 168: 381–393.Google Scholar
  150. Warren, D. K., Patterson, D. K., and Pepperberg, I. M., 1996, Mechanisms of American English vowel production in a Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus), Auk 113: 4158.Google Scholar
  151. Wasserman, F. E., and Cigliano, J. A., 1991, Song output and stimulation of the female in White-throated Sparrows, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 55–59.Google Scholar
  152. Weary, D. M., Krebs, J. R., Eddyshaw, R., McGregor, P. K., and Horn, A., 1988, Decline in song output by Great Tits: exhaustion or motivation? Anim. Behay. 36: 1242–1244.Google Scholar
  153. Weary, D. M., Lambrechts, M. M., and Krebs, J. R., 1991, Does singing exhaust male Great Tits? Anim. Behay. 41: 540–542.Google Scholar
  154. West, M. J., and King, A. P., 1980, Enriching cowbird song by social deprivation, J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho). 94: 263–270.Google Scholar
  155. West, M. J., and King, A. P., 1988, Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird, Nature 334: 244–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. West, M. J., King, A. P., Eastzer, D. H., and Staddon, J. E. R., 1979, A bioassay of isolate cowbird song, J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho). 93: 124–133.Google Scholar
  157. Westneat, M. W., Long, J. H., Jr., Hoese, W., and Nowicki, S., 1993, Kinematics of birdsong: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows, J. Exp. Biol. 182: 147–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Wild, J. M., 1993a, Descending projections of the songbird nucleus robustus archistriatalis, J. Comp. Neural. 338: 225–241.Google Scholar
  159. Wild, J. M., 1993b, The avian nucleus retroambigualis: a nucleus for breathing, singing and calling, Brain Res. 606: 119–124.Google Scholar
  160. Wild, J. M., 1994, The auditory-vocal-respiratory axis in birds, Brain Behay. Evol. 44: 192–209.Google Scholar
  161. Williams, H., Cynx, J., and Nottebohm, F., 1989, Timbre control in Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables, J. Comp. Psycho. 103: 366–380.Google Scholar
  162. Williams, H., Crane, L. A., Hale, T. K., Esposito, M. A., and Nottebohm, F., 1992, Rightside dominance for song control in the Zebra Finch, J. Neurobiol. 23: 1006–1020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Yu, A. C., and Margoliash, D., 1996, Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds, Science 273: 1871–1875.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick A. Suthers
    • 1
  • Franz Goller
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Sciences Program, Program for Neural Science, Center for the Integrative Study of Animal BehaviorIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Medical Sciences Program, Center for the Integrative Study of Animal BehaviorIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations