The Power of Distinctions

  • Ioanna Tsivacou

Abstract

Power is one of the crucial issues in Critical Systems Thinking. It is connected with the position of that approach for “...human well-being and emancipation” (Flood and Jackson, 1991: 49). As is well known, there are differences in the way that critical systems thinkers view the subject of emancipation (Flood and Ulrich, 1990; Jackson, 1985, 1990). However, as their main concern is a redefinition of Management and Systems Sciences, as well as the provision of theoretical and practical principles for the functioning of a critical systems methodology based on dialogue and on critical self-reflective action, they sought mainly theoretical support in the Habermasian analysis for distorted communication. Therefore, in their writings, the notion of power is not the outcome of an original work, but rather a notion borrowed primarily from the theoretical project of Habermas, and secondarily from that of Foucault. An exception could be considered Oliga’s endeavor to deal with the concept of power as he attempted to inquire into the phenomena of stability and change of social systems (Oliga, 1990(a), 1990(b)).

Keywords

Coherence Lost Sprit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benton, T., 1981, “Objective” interests and the sociology of power, Sociology, 15(2): 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Canetti, E., 1962, “Crowds and Power,” Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, R., 1983, Canetti’s sting, unpublished, Department of Behaviour, University of Lancaster, Lancaster.Google Scholar
  4. Espejo, R., 1993, Domains of interactions between a social system and its environment, in: “A Challenge for Systems Thinking,” I. Tsivacou, ed., University of the Aegean Press, Athens.Google Scholar
  5. Flood, R.L., and Jackson, M.C., 1991, “Creative Problem Solving,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Flood, R.L, and Ulrich, W., 1990, Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners, Systems Practice. 3(1): 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Habermas, J., 1972, “Knowledge and Human Interests,” Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  8. Hindess, B., 1982, Power, interests and the outcomes of struggle, Sociology, 16: 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson, M.C., 1985, Social systems theory and practice: the need for a critical approach, International journal of Genernal Systems. 10: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, M. C., 1990, The critical kernel in modern systems thinking, Systems Practice. 3(4): 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kenney, M., and Florida, R., 1988, Beyond mass production: production and the labor process in Japan, Politics and Society. 16(1): 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luhmann, N., 1990(a), The autopoiesis of social systems, in: “Essays on Self-Reference,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Luhmann, N., 1990(b), Meaning as sociology’ s basic concept, in: “Essays on Self-Reference,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Lukes, S., 1974, “Power: A Radical View,” Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Maturana, H., 1987, Everything is said by an observer, in: “Gaia: A Way of Knowing,” W.I. Thompson, ed., Lindisfarme Press, California.Google Scholar
  16. Maturana, H., 1988, Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument, The Irish Journal of Psychology. 9(1): 25–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliga, J., 1990(a), Power-ideology matrix in social systems control, Systems Practice. 3(1): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliga, J., 1990(b), Power in organisations: a contingent, relational view, Systems Practice. 3(5): 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Redding, S.G., 1980, Cognition as an aspect of culture and its relationship to management processes: an exploratory view of the Chinese cases, Journal of Management Studies. 17: 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Redding, S.G., 1990, “The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism,” De Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Von Foerster, H., 1979, Cybernetics in cybernetics, in: “Communications and Control in Society,” K. Krippendorff, ed., Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioanna Tsivacou
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the AegeanAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations