Some Anomalies in Ulrich’s Critical Inquiry and Problem-Solving Approach

  • Norma Romm


This paper probes some of Ulrich’s assertions with respect to the relevance of a Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH) approach to critical inquiry and problem solving, and it draws out certain anomalies in the position. The concept of ‘anomaly’ as used here is derived from Gouldner (1980). It refers to internal contradictions in a theory (as located by a critic) or points to ‘information’ which represents bad news for the theory (which the theoretician may be inclined to resist). ‘Hostile information’ or bad news evokes (perceived) events or ideas not accounted for in the theory and not in keeping with its premises — hence generating an external anomaly. Gouldner argues that all theories can be considered critically by locating anomalies (both internally and externally derived ones), thus providing impetus for reconsideration of theoretical positions and their implications for relevant practice. In this paper, anomalies are posed in confrontation with the texts of Ulrich, as part of an effort to enter into dialogue with, and extend, the work.


Soft System Methodology Theoretical Claim Critical System Thinking Critical Heuristic Critical System Heuristic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babüroglu, O., 1992, Tracking the development of the Emery-Trist Systems Paradigm, Systems Practice, 5: 3, pp263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Flood, R.L., and Romm, N.R.A., 1995, Enhancing the process of choice in TSI, Systems Practice (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W., 1990, Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners, Systems Practice, 3: 3, pp7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gouldner, A.W., 1980, “The Two Marxisms”, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  5. Gregory, W.J., 1993, Designing educational systems, Systems Practice, 6:2, pp 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gregory, W.J, and Romm, N.R.A., 1994, Developing multi-agency dialogue: the role(s) of facilitation, Working Paper 6, Univ. of Hull, Centre for Systems Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Gurevitch, Z.D., 1989, The power of not understanding, Jnl Appl. Beh. Sci. 25: 2, pp 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ivanov, K., 1991, Critical Systems Thinking and Information Technology, Jnl Appl. Syst. Anal., Vol. 18, 39–55.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, M.C., 1985, Book review on W. Ulrich: The itinerary of a critical approach, J. Opl Res. Soc., 36: 9, pp878–881.Google Scholar
  10. McKay, V.I., and Romm, N.R.A., 1992, “People’s Education in Theoretical Perspective”, Maskew Miller Longman, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  11. Romm, N.R.A., 1991, “The Methodologies of Positivism and Marxism”, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  12. Romm, N.R.A., 1994(a), Symbolic theory, in: “Social Theory”, N.R.A. Romm and M. Sarakinsky, eds, Heinemann, Johannesburg, 325–339.Google Scholar
  13. Romm, N.R.A., 1994(b), Continuing tensions between soft systems methodology and critical systems heuristics, Working Paper 5, Centre for Systems Studies. University of Hull.Google Scholar
  14. Romm, N.R.A., 1995, Knowing as intervention, Systems Practice, 8:2 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Romm, N.R.A. and Romm, N.L., 1987, Militarizing tolerance, De Arte, Vol. 36, pp23–26.Google Scholar
  16. Taket, A., 1994, Undercover agency? — ethics, responsibility and the practice of OR, J. Opl Res. Soc, 45: 2, pp123–132.Google Scholar
  17. Ulrich, W., 1983, “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning”, Paul Haupt, Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  18. Ulrich, W., 1986, Critical heuristics of social systems design, Working Paper 10, Dept. of Management Systems and Sciences, University of Hull, Hull.Google Scholar
  19. Ulrich, W., 1991, Critical heuristics of systems design, in: “Critical Systems Thinking”, R.L. Flood and M.C. Jackson, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 103–115.Google Scholar
  20. Ulrich, W., 1994, Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design?, Interfaces, 24: 4, pp26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norma Romm
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Systems StudiesUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations