Advertisement

Information Use in the ‘New’ Organization

The Organic Metaphor and its Implications
  • Richard Kamm

Abstract

A common theme in much recent work on managerial practice is that, if organizations are to survive the challenges of contemporary economic, technological and social conditions, they need to take on a particular form. The well-structured, bureaucratic corporation, is criticised as rigid, dehumanising and incapable of adapting to the rapid changes of the business environment. The style of thinking that it embodies, mechanistic philosophy or scientific management, is held to be less appropriate than an approach which emphasises decentralization, autonomy and flexibility. Such principles are seen as resting in an organizational form variously characterised as ‘new’ (Drucker, 1988), ‘knowledge-based’ (Quinn, 1992), ‘informated’ (Zuboff, 1988), ‘virtual’ (Harrington, 1991) and even ‘postmodern’ (Bergquist, 1993). Beneath these labels lies a common perception of the adaptable, decentralised organizations which recapitulates Burns’ (1971) idea of the organic type of structure. This, in turn, can be related to the wider organismic metaphor for social activity (Morgan, 1986).

Keywords

Total Quality Management Mechanistic View Total Institution Organic View United Kingdom Introduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergquist, W., 1993, “The Postmodern Organization,” Jossey Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Beniger, J., 1986, “The Control Revolution,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, T., 1971, Mechanistic and organismic structures, in: “Organizational Theory,” D. Pugh, ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A., and Tawady, K., 1990, “Mission and Business Philosophy,” Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, J.H., 1985, An organizational interpretation of evolution, in: “Evolution at the Crossroads: the New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science,” D.J. Depew and B.H. Weber, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A.D., 1977, “The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Delisi, P.S., 1990, Lessons from the steel axe: culture, technology and organizational change, Sloan Mgt. Rev. 32:1:83–93.Google Scholar
  8. Drucker, P., 1988, The coming of the new organization, Harvard Bus. Rev. 66:1:45–53.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E., 1957, “Professional Ethics and Civic Morals,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M., 1977, “Discipline and Punish,” Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
  11. Harrington, J., 1991, “Organizational Structure and Information Technology,” Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  12. Hart, H.L.A., 1961, “The Concept of Law,” Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson, G.M., 1993, “Economics and Evolution,” Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Tgnaticff, M., 1978, “A Just Measure of Pain,” Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Kamm, R.M., 1993, Metaphorical thinking and information systems: the example of the mechanistic metaphor, in: “Systems Science,” F. Stowell, D. West and J. Howell, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kast, F.E., and Rosenzweig J.E., 1985 “Organization and Management,” 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, D., and Kahn, R.L., 1978, “The Social Psychology of Organizations,” 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Levins, R. and Lewontin, R., 1985, “The Dialectical Biologist,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  19. Mayo, E., 1949, “The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, G., 1986, “Images of Organization,” Sage, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Peters, T., 1987, “Thriving on Chaos,” Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Rodgers, T.J., 1990, No excuses management, Harvard Bus. Rev. 68:4:84–98.Google Scholar
  23. Quinn, J.B., 1992, “Intelligent Enterprise: a Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry,” Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Scott Morton, M.S., 1991, “The Corporation of the 1990s,” Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Zuboff, S., 1988, “In the Age of the Smart Machine,” Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Kamm
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Studies and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations