Structuration and Enacted Social Systems

  • Elizabeth W. Garnsey
  • Séamas B. Kelly


Giddens’ theory of structuration (1984) represents one of the most influential developments in social theory in recent years. His work focuses on the dialectic interplay between agency and structure within social systems, and has provided the basis for a number of recent empirical studies of organisational life (Walsham, 1993; Roberts, 1990; Barley, 1986). However, the use of this theory in empirical research can be fraught with difficulty. The concepts employed by Giddens are subtle and rich in insight but they are also prone to misinterpretation and distortion. In this paper we make use of the idea of enactment which, we argue, an approach to the study of social life, which is conceptually simpler and more intuitive than that of structuration theory. The enactment approach enables us to draw on the insights of structuration theory and couch them within a systems framework.


Structuration Theory System Thinking Soft System Methodology Recent Empirical Study Enactment Approach 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alrich, H., 1991, Incommensurable Paradigms? Vital Signs from Three Perspectives in: M. Reed, M. Hughes, eds, “Rethinking Organization: new directions in organizational theory and analysis”, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  2. Barley, S., 1986, Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments, Admin. Sci. Qu. 31: 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J., 1990, “Soft Systems Methodology in Action”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, J., Modgil, C., and Modgil S., 1990, “Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy”, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, I., 1989, “Structuration Theory; Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life”, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  6. DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M.S., 1994, Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive Structuration Theory, Organization Science 5, 2, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnsey E., 1993, Exploring a critical systems perspective, Innovation in Social Sciences Research 6, 2: 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garnsey E., and Rees, B., 1994, Discourse and Enactment: Gender Inequality in Text and Context, Cambridge Research Papers, in: “Management Studies”, No. 20, 1993–4, Forthcoming in Human Relations.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens A., 1981, Agency, institution and time-space analysis, in: K. Knorr-Cetina, and A. Cicourel, eds., “Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: toward and integration of micro-and macro-sociologies”, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens A., 1984, “The Constitution of Society: an outline of the theory of structuration”, Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens A., 1989, A reply to my critics, in: “Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics”,: D. Held, and J.B. Thompson, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Havel, V., 1986, The power of the powerless, in “Living in Truth”,: J. Vladislav (ed.), Faber, London.Google Scholar
  13. Hosking, D.M., and Morley, I.E., 1991, “A Social Psychology of Organizing: people, processes and contexts”, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, J., 1990, Strategy and accounting in a UK conglomerate, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 10, 4: 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Senge, P., 1990, “The Fifth Discipline; the art and practice of the learning organization”, Doubleday, N.Y.Google Scholar
  16. Walsham, G., 1993, “Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.Google Scholar
  17. Weick, K., 1979, “The Social Psychology of Organizing”, second ed., Random House, N.Y.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth W. Garnsey
    • 1
  • Séamas B. Kelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering and The Judge Institute of Management StudiesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations