A Theoretical Framework for the Development of a Social Accounting System
The aim of this paper is to present a theoretical framework for the study of the internal coherence of social systems. Maintaining this internal coherence, in spite of continuous perturbations from its environment, is what we understand as the viability of the system. On the other hand, an effective organisation is one that preserves its viability and a system that permits the continuous measurement of this effectiveness is what we are naming as a social accounting system.
KeywordsOrganisational Complexity External Perturbation Operational Domain Internal Coherence Closed Network
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Argyris, C., and Schön, D., 1978, “Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
- Ashby, R., 1964, “An Introduction to Cybernetics,” Methuen, London.Google Scholar
- Beer, S., 1979, “The Heart of Enterprise,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Espejo, R., 1989, The viable system model revisited, in: “The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM,” R. Espejo and R. Harnden, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Espejo, R., 1993, Management of complexity in problem solving, in “Organisational Fitness,” R. Espejo and M. Schwaninger, eds., Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
- Geyer, F. and Van der Zouwen, J., eds., 1986, “Sociocybernetic Paradoxes,” Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A., 1984, “The Constitution of Society,” Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Maturana, H., and Varela, F., 1987, “The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding,” New Science Library, Boston.Google Scholar
- Varela, F., 1979, “Principles of Biological Autonomy,” Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
- Von Foerster, H., 1979, Cybernetics of cybernetics, in: “Communications and Control in Society,” K. Krippendorff, ed., Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar