Skip to main content

Redundancy Structures in Respiratory Control

  • Chapter

Abstract

The observation that arterial CO2 tension is regulated (remains at the resting value) under a metabolic CO2 load via exercise, but increases under an airway CO2 load via inspiratory CO2, has motivated numerous theories about the structure of the respiratory controller. This respiratory control system behavior appears to be most consistent with a feedforward/feedback control system structure.1 The peripheral chemoreceptors (carotid body) and indirectly central brain chemoreceptors act as feedback mechanisms with respect to the regulation of arterial CO2 tension. Feedforward mechanisms (signals related to metabolic CO2 production during exercise) are more controversial. Part of this controversy relates to the traditional “search” for a “single” mechanism that will explain the exercise hyperpnea response.2 However, in general, biological systems are characterized by redundancy, suggesting that many “signals” may be combined to form an appropriate feedforward stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. D. Swanson, Overview of ventilating control during exercise, Med. Sci. Sports 11: 221–226 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. H. Comroe, Physiology of Respiration, Year Book Medical Chicago (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. D. Swanson, “Respiratory control during exercise,” in Encyclopedia of Systems and Control, M. Singh, Ed. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 4045–4051 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. S. Yamamoto, Computer simulation of ventilatory control by both neural and humoral CO2 signals. Am. 7. Physiol. 238: 28–35 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Neil, R. G. O’Regan, The effects of electrical stimulation of the distal and the cut sinus and aortic nerves on peripheral arterial chemoreception activity in the cat. J. Physiol. 215: 15–32 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Neil, R. G. O’Regan, Efferent and afferent impulse activity recorded from few-fibre preparations of outher intact sinus and aortic nerves. J. Physiol. 215: 33–47 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Lugliani, B. J. Whipp, C. Seard, K. Wasserman, Effects of bilateral carotid body resection on ventilatory control at rest and during exercise in man. N. Eng. J. Med., 285: 1105–1111 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C.S. Poon, Optimal Control of ventilation in hypoxia, hypercapnia and exercise. In: B. J. Whipp, D. M. Wiberg (eds.) Proc. Symp. Modelling and Control of Breathing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 189–196 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. D. Swanson and P. A. Robbins, Optimal respiratory controller structures, IEEE Trans. Biomed Engr. 33: 677–680 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. D. Swanson, Reply to comments on “Optimal respiratory controller structures.” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr. 35-395-397 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. C. Moore, C. W. Zwillich, J. D. Battaglia, E. K. Cotton, and J. V. Weill, “Respiratory failure associated with familial depression of ventilatory response of hypoxia and hypercapnia,” New England, J. Med., vol. 295, pp. 862–865 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Shea, L. P. Andres, R. B. Banzett, A. Guz and D. C. Shannon, The ventilatory response to exercise in the absence of CO2 sensitivity, Am. Rev. Respir, Dis. 143: A593 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Ward and B. J. Whipp, “Ventilatory control during exercise with increased external dead space,” J. Appl. Physiol. vol. 48, pp. 225–231 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. D. Swanson, The exercise hyperpnea dilemma, Chest 73: 270–272 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. W. Harmon, “A re-examination of the metaphysical foundations of modern science,” The Institute of Noctic Sciences, Sausalito, California (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yogi Ramachavaka, “A Science of Breath,” The Yogi Publication Society, Chicago (1905).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swanson, G.D. (1992). Redundancy Structures in Respiratory Control. In: Honda, Y., Miyamoto, Y., Konno, K., Widdicombe, J.G. (eds) Control of Breathing and Its Modeling Perspective. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9847-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9847-0_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9849-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9847-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics