Advertisement

Identification of Closed-Loop Chemoreflex Dynamics Using Pseudorandom Stimuli

  • Eugene N. Bruce
  • Mohammad Modarreszadeh
  • Kenneth Kump

Abstract

A brief disturbance to respiratory chemical feedback loops may initiate an interval of oscillatory fluctuations in ventilation1. The propensity for such oscillations to occur often is quantified1, 2 in terms of chemical feedback “loop gain”. A more direct and more complete characterization of the stability of ventilation can be obtained, however, by measuring the time course of the ventilatory response to a standard, brief disturbance3, 4. With appropriate parameterization of such responses, one can obtain indices which are highly correlated with loop gain, or can calculate loop gain itself. To characterize and compare the dynamics of central and peripheral chemoreflex loops of mail to disturbances, we have assessed the closed-loop ventilatory responses to single-breath inhalations of hypercapnic and hypoxic gases respectively. Such assessments in awake man are hampered by the typically large ventilatory variability relative to the small ventilatory responses elicited by such brief chemical stimuli. To overcome this limitation we have used pseudorandom chemical stimulation instead of single-breath inhalations. The responses were parameterized using the prediction-error method of transfer function estimation5.

Keywords

Impulse Response Ventilatory Response Loop Gain Periodic Breathing Ventilatory Oscillation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carley, D. W., and D. C. Shannon, A minimal mathematical model of human periodic breathing. J.Appl. Physiol. 65: 1400(1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khoo, M. C. K., R.E. Kronauer, K. Strohl, and A. S. Slutsky, Factors inducing periodic breathing in humans: a general model. J. Appl. Physiol. 53:644(1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carley, D. W., and D. C. Shannon, Relative stability of human respiration during hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 65: 1389(1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleming, P. J., A. L. Concalves, M. R. Levine, and S. Woolard, The deyelopemnt of stability of respiration in human infants: changes in ventilatory responses to spontaneous sihgs. J. Physiol. Lond. 347:1(1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ljung, L., 1987, “System Identification: Theory for the User”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Modarreszadeh, M., and E. N. Bruce, Long-lasting ventilatory response of humans to a single breath of hypercapnia in hyperoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 72:242(1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Modarreszadeh, M., Systems Analysis of Breath to Breath Ventilatory Variations in Man: Role of CO2 Feedback. Ph. D. Dissertation: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sohrab, S., and S. M. Yamashiro, Pseudorandom testing of ventilatory response to inspired carbon dioxide in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 49:1000(1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brusil, P. J., T. B. Wagener, R. E. Kronauer, and P. Gulesian, Methods for identifying respiratory oscillations disclose altitude effects. J. Appl. Physiol. 48:545(1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ElHefnawy, A., G. M. Saidel, E. N. Bruce, and N. S. Cherniack, Stability analysis of CO2 control of ventilation. J. Appl. Physiol. 69:498(1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khoo, M. C. K., and V. Z. Marmarelis, Estimation of peripheral chemoreflex gain from spontaneous sigh responses. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:393(1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dhawale, P., and E. N. Bruce, Ventilatory response to hypoxia: Estimation using pseudorandom technique. FASEB J. 4:A1106(1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Modarreszadeh, M., E. N. Bruce, and B. Gothe, Nonrandom variability in respiratory cycle parameters of man during quiet sleep. J. Appl. Physiol. 69:630(1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khatib, M. F., Y. Oku, and E. N. Bruce, Contribution of chemical feedback loops to breath-to-breath variability of tidal volume. Respir. Physiol. 83:115(1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene N. Bruce
    • 1
  • Mohammad Modarreszadeh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth Kump
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Biomedical EngineeringCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations