Advertisement

Recent Progress in the 3N- and 4N-Problem

  • W. Glöckle
  • H. Kamada
  • H. Witała

Abstract

What is a useful Hamiltonian for low energy nuclear physics (below the pion threshold) to describe bound and scattering states? Is it a good approximation to use the same 2N interaction, which acts between two free nucleons? Are 3-body forces (or even forces between more than three particles) required? Is the nonrelativistic framework sufficient? These are old questions. The existence of modern supercomputers combined with powerful algorithms allow a quantitative access to an answer by solving few-nucleon equations precisely and thereby testing dynamical concepts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L.D. Faddeev, Sov.Phys. JETP 12: 1014 (1961).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Witala, Th. Cornelius, and W. Glöckle, Few-Body Systems 3: 123 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Glöckle, Lecture Notes in Physics 273: 3 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Glöckle, “The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem”, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Glöckle, H. Witala, and Th. Cornelius, Nucl. Phys. A 508: 115c (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Glöckle, H. Witala, and Th. Cornelius, in: Proceedings of the 25th Zakopane School on Physics, Vol 2: Selected Topics in Nuclear Structure, ed.: J. Styczen and Z. Stachura, World Scientific, Singapore (1990), page 300.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.B. Wiringa, R. A. Smith, T. L. Ainsworth, Phys. Rev. C 29: 1207 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.M. Nagels, T.A. Rijken, and J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. D 17: 768 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Lacombe et al, Phys. Rev. C 21: 861 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19: 189 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.A.Arndt,L.D. Roper, R.L.Workman, M.W. McNaughton, Phys. Rev. D45: 3995(1992) and SAID 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.A.M. Klomp, V.G.J. Stoks, and J.J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 45: 2023 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J.J. de Swart, R.A. M. Klomp, T.A. Rijken, and V.G.J. Stoks, Few-Body Systems, Suppl. 6: 105 (1992).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    R. Henneck, preprint 1992.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    G.H. Berthold, A. Stadler, and H. Zankel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61: 1077 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. G.H. Berthold, A. Stadler, and H. Zankel, Phys. Rev. C 41: 1365 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    W. Tornow, C.R. Howell, R.L. Walter, and I. Slaus, Phys. Rev. C 45: 459 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    H. Witala, and W. Glöckle, Nucl. Phys. A 528: 48 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    R. Machleidt, private communication.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    W. von Witsch, private communication.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    J. Krug, private communication.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    C.R. Howell et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61: 1565 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. H. Witala, W. Glöckle, and Th. Cornelius, Phys Rev. C 39: 384 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 21.
    O.A. Yakubovsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 5: 937 (1967).Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    P. Grassberger, and W. Sandhas, Nucl. Phys. B 2: 181 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. E.O. Alt, P. Grassberger, and W. Sandhas, Phys. Rev C 1: 85 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 23.
    H. Kamada, and W. Glöckle, Nucl. Phys. A 548: 205 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 24.
    H. Kamada, and W. Glöckle, Phys. Lett. B 292: 1 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 25.
    N.W. Schellingerhout, J.J. Schut, and L.P. Kok, Phys. Rev. C 46: 1192 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 26.
    S.B. Merkuriev, S.L. Yakovlev, and C. Gignoux, Nucl. Phys. A 431: 125 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 27.
    W.N. Polyzou and W.Glöckle, Few-Body Systems 9: 97 (1990).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 28.
    J.L. Friar, B.F. Gibson, G.L. Payne and C.R. Chen, Phys. Lett. 247B: 197 (1990)Google Scholar
  33. C.R. Chen, G.L. Payne, J.L. Friar and B.F. Gibson, Phys. Rev. C 44: 50 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 29.
    CINDA, International Atomic Agency, Vienna, (1988).Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    W. Grüebler, V. König, P.A. Schmelzbach, F. Sperisen, B. Jenny, R.E. White, F. Seiler and H.W. Raser, Nucl. Phys. A 398: 445 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 31.
    A.C. Berick, R.A. Riddle and C.M. York, Phys. Rev. 174: 1105 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 32.
    G. Janson, Ph. D. thesis, Universitet Uppsala (1985).Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    H. Shimizu et al, Nucl. Phys. A 382: 242 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 34.
    H. Rühl et al, Nucl. Phys. A 524: 377 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 35.
    J.M. Cameron, private communication.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    F. Sperisen et al., Nucl. Phys. A 422: 81 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 37.
    M.Sawada et al., Phys, Rev. C 27: 1932 (1983).Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    W. Tornow et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49: 312 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 39.
    K. Sagara, private communication.Google Scholar
  45. 40.
    H. Paetz gen. Schieck, private communication.Google Scholar
  46. 41.
    G. Rauprich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 535: 313 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 42.
    F. Foroughi et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 11: 59 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 43.
    B. Dechant, Ph. D. thesis, Ruhr Universität Bochum (1992).Google Scholar
  49. 44.
    K. Bodek, private communication.Google Scholar
  50. 45.
    M. Stephan et al., Phys. Rev. C 39: 2133 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 46.
    E. Finckh, private communication.Google Scholar
  52. 47.
    J. Strate et al, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. L 229: 14 (1988).Google Scholar
  53. 48.
    G.A. Baker, J. L. Gammel, B. J. Hill, J. G. Wills, Phys. Rev. 125: 1754 (1962).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 49.
    A.B. Volkov, Nucl. Phys. 74: 33 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 50.
    I.R. Afnan, Y. C. Tang, Phys. Rev. 175: 1337 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 51.
    R.A. Malfliet, J. A. Tjon, Nucl. Phys. Al27: 161 (1969).Google Scholar
  57. 52.
    M. Kamimura, H. Kameyama, Nucl. Phys. A508: 117c (1990).Google Scholar
  58. 53.
    H. Tanaka, Suppl. of Prog. Theor. Phys. 56: 1 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 54.
    J. Carlson, V. R. Pandharipande, R. B. Wiringa, Nucl. Phys. A 401: 59 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 55.
    R.V. Reid, Ann. of Phys. 50: 411 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Glöckle
    • 1
  • H. Kamada
    • 1
  • H. Witała
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische Physik IIRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsJagellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations