Abstract
The assumption that the nature of the relationship between the therapist and client is an important factor in the therapeutic process and outcome has led to much theoretical speculation and research on possible relationship variables that may have therapeutic relevance. The assumed importance of empathy on the part of the therapist has led to efforts to ensure empathetic characteristics by focusing on empathy training for the therapist. However, while much has been written about the importance of the nature and degree of empathy of the therapist, there has been little focus on the empathetic characteristics of the client. Further, there has been little discussion and research on the necessity of training the client to have appropriate empathy, which will facilitate relief of presenting symptoms and increase quality of life. Orlinsky and Howard (1986) did not find any studies where client empathy was included within a process outcome study. There are a number of therapeutic values in having the client be appropriately empathetic in daily living. The result of empathy training should lead to improving the human condition, not only of the one being trained, but also of many others who come into contact with the client. The advantages of teaching empathy to the client can include the following:
-
1.
Clients will:
-
be better able to predict the responses of others
-
increase tolerance toward others
-
reduce aggression toward others
-
-
2.
Empathy training will:
-
help in conflict resolution
-
help therapy be more effective
-
help reduce objectionable behaviors such as teasing of others
-
lead to action in helping others, for example, charity, food donated, money donated, giving car rides, taking care of the sick
-
promote maturity and self-differentiation
-
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barkham, M. (1988). Empathy in counseling and psychotherapy: Present status and future directions. Counseling and Psychological Quarterly, 1, 407–428.
Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Cautela, J. R. (1967). Covert sensitization. Psychological Record, 20, 459–468.
Cautela, J. R. (1970a). Covert reinforcement. Behavior Therapy, 1, 33–50.
Cautela, J. R. (1970b). Covert negative reinforcement. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1, 273–278.
Cautela, J. R. (1971). Covert extinction. Behavior Therapy, 2, 192–200.
Cautela, J. R. (1972). Reinforcement survey schedule: Evaluation and current applications. Psychological Reports, 30, 683–690.
Cautela, J. R. (1976a). The present status of covert modeling. The Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 7, 323–326.
Cautela, J. R. (1976b). Covert response cost. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 13, 397–404.
Cautela, J. R. (1983). The self-control triad. Behavior Modification, 7(3), 299–315.
Cautela, J. R., & Kastenbaum, R. A. (1967). Reinforcement survey schedule for use in therapy, training and research. Psychological Reports, 21, 1115–1130.
Cautela, J. R., & Kearney, A. J. (Eds.). (1986). The covert conditioning handbook. New York: Springer.
Cautela, J. R., & Kearney, A. J. (Eds.). (1993). The covert conditioning casebook. Pacific Crove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Cautela, J. R., & Lynch, E. (1983). Reinforcement survey schedule: Scoring, administration and complete research. Psychological Reports, 53, 447–465.
Cautela, J. R., Cautela, J., & Esonis, S. (1983). The adolescent reinforcement survey schedule. In Forms for behavior analysis with children (pp. 46–49). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Chiaramonte, J. A. (1992). And the war goes on. Social Work, 37, 469–470.
Holmes, G. R., Heckel, R. V., Chestnut, E., Harris, N., & Cautela, J. R. (1987). Eactor analysis of the adolescent reinforcement survey schedule (ARSS) with college freshmen. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 386–390.
Kleinknecht, R. A., McCormick, C. E., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Stability of stated reinforcers as measured by the reinforcement survey schedule. Behavior Therapy, 4, 407–413.
Mermis, B. J. (1971). Self-report of reinforcers and looking time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1986). Process outcome in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed., pp. 311–381). Chichester: John Wiley.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Williams, C. A. (1989). Empathy and burnout in male and female helping professionals. Research in Nursing and Health, 12, 169–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cautela, J.R. (1996). Training the Client to Be Empathetic. In: Cautela, J.R., Ishaq, W. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Behavior Therapy. Applied Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9826-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9826-5_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9828-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9826-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive