A University for the Twenty-First Century

  • E. A. Vargas
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)


We all know the picture well. Each year hundreds of thousands of students enter institutions of higher education: universities, technical schools, state and private colleges. Many drop out and many are dropped out. Most achieve less than they are capable of accomplishing. These outcomes underline the dismal quality of higher education. The failures are not personal. They are institutional. Many of the brightest and the best are dimmed and diminished by the instructional organizations they enter.


Faculty Member Subject Matter Shaping Model Instructional Technology Delivery Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arguin, G. (1994). Towards a new conception of university leadership. Inter-American Journal of University Management, 7, 3.Google Scholar
  2. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Feldman, M. W., Chen, K. H., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1982). Theory and observation in cultural transmission. Science, 218, 19–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, D. A. (1993). Behaviorism evolves. Educational Technology, 33, 62–77.Google Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species (6th ed.) New York: Appleton and Company. (1898 printing date)Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Eshleman, J. W., & Vargas, E. A. (1996). The personalized system of instruction: A critical evaluation from a cybernetic systems context. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Feynman, R. P. (1985). Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman! New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Feynman, R. P. (1988). What do you care what other people think? New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Upon further reflection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Vargas, E. A. (1988a). Teachers in the classroom: Behaviorological science and an effective instructional technology. Youth Policy, 20(7), 33–34.Google Scholar
  11. Vargas, E. A. (1988b). Verbally governed and event-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 11–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vargas, E. A. (1991). Behaviorology: Its paradigm. In W. Ishaq (Ed.), Human behavior in today’s world. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Vargas, E. A. (1992). La evaluación académica como proceso para el control de calidad y la innovación. In V. A. Arredondo (Ed.); Evaluación, promoción de la calidad y financiamiento de la educación superior, (pp. 75–93). Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
  14. Vargas, E. A. (1993). From behaviorism to selectionism. Educational Technology, 33(10), 46–51.Google Scholar
  15. Vargas, E. A. (1994a, January). The university system of the state of Quintana Roo. Consultant’s Project Report. Morgantown, WV: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Vargas, E. A. (1994b). Behaviorology and the other behavioral sciences. Behaviorology, 2(1), 17–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Vargas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and FoundationsWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations