Skip to main content

Developments in the Psychometric Foundations of Neuropsychological Assessment

  • Chapter
Contemporary Approaches to Neuropsychological Assessment

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Neuropsychology ((CINP))

Abstract

The last decade for neuropsychology has been a fruitful period for developing a new psychometric methodology. The major development in methodology has also initiated a significant theoretical advance. The methodological development has been the creation of computerized scoring programs. The construction of these programs utilized new methods to norm large test batteries. These methods, in turn, required the perfection of a methodology theory related to groups or batteries of tests. The theory may be called a test set theory. While there have been many developments in regard to individual tests, this chapter will concentrate on those aspects of neuropsychology that are related to this development of computerized assessment batteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer, R. M. (1994). The flexible battery approach to neuropsychological assessment. In R. D. Van-derploeg (Ed.), A guide to neuropsychological practice (pp. 259–290 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschke, H. (1973). Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. Journal of Verbal Learning Behavior, 12, 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choca, J., Laatsch, L., Garside, D., Arnemann, C. (1994). CAT: The computer Category Test. Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson, B., Hughes, C. W., Roth, D. L., Monkowski, P. G. (1984). Review of Russell’s norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 635–641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., Ober, B. (1987). CVLT.• California Verbal Learning Test—Research Edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodrill, C. B. (1979). Sex differences on the Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Battery and on other neuropsychological measures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 236–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodrill, C. B. (1988). What constitutes normal performance in clinical neuropsychology? Paper presented at the 97th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn L. M. (1981). PPVT, Peabody, Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised, Manual. Cir-cle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fastenau, P. S., Adams, K. M. (1996). Heaton, Grant, and Matthew’s Comprehensive Norms: An Overzealous attempt. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm-Auch, D., Yeudall, L. T. (1983). Normative data for the Halstead–Reitan neuropsychologi-cal tests. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 221–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, D. R. (1993). A review of the Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Battery norms program. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A., Purisch, A. D. (1980). Manual for the Luria–Nebraska Neuro-psychological Battery. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K., Scheerer, M. (1941). Abstract and concrete behavior. An experimental study with special tests. Psychological Monographs, 53 (2, Serial No. 239).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. (1983a). The Assessment of aphasia and related disorders (rev. ed.). Philadelphia: Lea Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass H., Kaplan, E. (1983b). Boston Naming Test—Booklet. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education ( 4th ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, K. Y., Linn, R. T., Hunt, W. C., Goodwin, J. S. (1983). A normative study of Russell’s variant of the Wechsler Memory Scale in a healthy elderly population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 878–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K. (1992). Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead—Reitan Battery: A supplement for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Matthews, C. G., Grant, I. Avitable, N. (1996). Demographic corrections with comprehensive norms: An overzealous attempt or a good start. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 18, 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., Matthews, C. G. (1986). Differences in neuropsychological test performance associated with age, education and sex. In I. Grant K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuro-psychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 100–120 ). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Grant I., Matthews, C. G. (1991). Comprehensive norms for an expanded HalsteadReitan Battery. Norms manual and computer program. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, J. F., Jastak, S. R., Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test, Revised (WRATR): Manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L., Kay, G. G. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: A review of tests and test batteries. Neuropsychology Review, 3, 1–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll B. K. Brynt (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, G. G., Morris, S., Starbuck, V. ( 1993, October). Age and education based norms control for the effects of occupation on pilot test performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Phoenix, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1980). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, P. A., Ross, T., Christensen, B. (1994). Preliminary normative data on the Boston Nam-ing Test for an older urban population. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. J. (1995). Microcomputer-assisted neuropsychological test analysis. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahurin, R. K. (1995). Halstead—Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System (HRNES). In T. C. Conoley and James C. Impara (Eds.), 12th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 448–451 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg, W. P., Hebben, N., Kaplan, E. (1986). The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuro-psychiatric disorders (pp. 65–86 ). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, J. D. (1977). Adult norms for the Halstead—Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Preliminary data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Sante Fe, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, J. D. (1981). T-Score conversion tables for Halstead—Reitan Neuropsychological test Battery for adults. Unpublished manuscript, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, J. D. (1988). Constructing overlapping cell tables to maximize the clinical usefulness of normative test data: Rationale and an example from neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 930–933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., Kaplan, E., Whitla, D., Wientraub, S., Catlin; R., Funkenstein, H. (1993). MicroCog: Assessment of cognitive functioning [manual and computer program]. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1987). The Neuropsychological Deficit Scale for Adults: Computer program. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1991). The Neuropsychological Deficit Scale for Adults Computer Program, Users Manual. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1992). The Neuropsychological Deficit Scale for Older Children Computer program. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., Wolfson, D. (1986a). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. In D. Wedding, A. M. Horton, J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook (pp. 134–160 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., Wolfson, D. (1986b). The Neuropsychological Deficit Scale for Younger Children: Computer program. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff, P. (1995). Review of the Halstead-Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System (HRNES). In J. C. Conoley and J. C. Impara (Eds.), 12th mental measurements yearbook (pp. 451–453 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1975). A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 800–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1980). Theoretical bases of the Luria-Nebraska and the Halstead-Reitan Battery. Paper presented at the 88th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1984). Theory and developments of pattern analysis methods related to the Halstead-Reitan battery. In P. E. Logue J. M. Shear (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 50–98 ). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1986). The psychometric foundation of clinical neuropsychology. In S. B. Filskov T. J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (vol. 2, pp. 45–80 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1987). A reference scale method for constructing neuropsychological test batteries. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 376–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1988). Renorming Russell’s version of the Wechsler Memory Scale. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 235–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1992). Comparison of two methods for converting the WAIS to the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 355–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1993). Halstead-Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System, norms and conversion tables. Unpublished data tables available from Elbert W. Russell, 6262 Sunset Dr., Suite PH 228, Miami, FL, 33143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1994). The cognitive-metric, fixed battery approach to neuropsychological assessment. In R. D. Vanderploeg (Ed.), A guide to neuropsychological practice (pp. 211–258 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1995). The accuracy of automated and clinical detection of brain damage and lateralization in neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review, 5 (1), 1–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Barron, J. H. (1989). A difference that is not a difference: Reply to Vanderploeg. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 317–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Hendrickson, M. E., VanEaton, E. (1988). Verbal and figural Gestalt Completion Tests with lateralized occipital area brain damage. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 217–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Levy, M. (1987). A revision of the Halstead Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 898–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Neuringer, C., Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuro-psychological approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Polakoff, D. (1993). Neuropsychological test patterns in men for Alzheimer’s and multi-infarct dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 327–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Russell, S. L. K. (1993). Left temporal lobe brain damage pattern on the WAIS. Addendum. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 241–244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Starkey, R. I. (1993). Halstead–Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System [manual and computer program]. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W., Starkey, R. I., Fernandez, C. D., Starkey, T. W. (1988). Halstead, Rennick, Russell Battery [manual and computer program]. Miami, FL: Scientific Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. J., Hunt, C., Glaser, B. (1990). A cross validation of the Revised Category Test. Psychological Assessment, 2, 486–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teuber, H. L. (1955). Physiological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 267–296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg, R. D. (1994). Estimating premorbid level of functioning. In R. D. Vanderploeg (Ed.), Clinicians guide to neuropsychological assessment (pp. 43–68 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised, manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition (WISC-III). Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT). Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test 3. Administration Manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. (1991). The Memory Assessment Scale (test and manual). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, E.W. (1997). Developments in the Psychometric Foundations of Neuropsychological Assessment. In: Goldstein, G., Incagnoli, T.M. (eds) Contemporary Approaches to Neuropsychological Assessment. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9820-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9820-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9822-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9820-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics