Advertisement

Do “Lateral Connections” in the Cortex Carry Out Topological Information?

  • F. Frisone
  • V. Sanguineti
  • P. Morasso

Abstract

The observed massive presence of non-local lateral connections in the cerebral cortex is not compatible with the implicit assumption of flatness of most models, including models of associative areas. We suggest a novel hypothesis about the functional role of lateral connections in such areas: they may reflect a topological representations of the task space. In particular, we show how the topologic information, supported by long-range connections in associative areas, can represent spatial or metric knowledge. The power of the mechanism is demonstrated by describing an activation dynamics and showing the formation of bands of ocular dominance.

Keywords

Topological Information Task Space Ocular Dominance Hebbian Learning Lateral Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    V. Braitenberg. Vehicles - Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Cherniak. Component placement optimization in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 14: 2418–2427, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Frisone, F. Firenze, P. Morasso, and L. Ricciardiello. Application of Topology-Representing Networks to the Estimation of the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Data. In ICANN95- Int. Conf on Artificial Neural Networks, volume 1, pages 323–327, Paris, October 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A.P. Georgopoulos, M. Taira, and A. Lukashin. Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. Science, 260: 47–51, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.H. Hubel and D.C. Freeman. Short communications: Projection into the visual field of ocular dominance columns in macaque monkey. Brain Res., 122: 336–343, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. I. Knudsen, S. du Lac, and S.D. Esterly. Computational maps in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10: 41–65, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. J. Mitchison. Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring. Proc. of the Royal Society, B: 151–158, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. J. Mitchison. Axonal trees and cortical architecture. Trends in Neurosciences, 15: 122–126, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Morasso and V. Sanguineti. Self-organizing body-schema for motor planning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26: 131–148, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    V. Sanguineti, R. Morasso, and F. Frisone. Cortical maps of sensorimotor spaces. In P. Morasso and V. Sanguineti, editors, Self-organization, Computational Maps, and Motor Control,pages 1–36. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1997. in press.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? an adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research,1995. in press.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    E. Zohary. Population coding of visual stimuli by cortical neurons tuned to more than one dimension. Biological Cybernetics, 66: 265–272, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Frisone
    • 1
  • V. Sanguineti
    • 1
  • P. Morasso
    • 1
  1. 1.DIST — Department of Informatics, Systems and TelecommunicationUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations