Population Coding, Population Regularity and Learning


The validity of population coding for movement within the motor cortex has now been confirmed by many experimental studies. The preferred direction of the population units seemed to be uniformly distributed. Previous studies have highlighted two points: (1) a regularity condition of the population activity distribution called H-regularity is a necessary and sufficient condition for learning with a class of biologically plausible correlation-based rules of synaptic modification without any bias. (2) H-regularity can result from a self-organization driven by the difference between feedforward and lateral inputs, whatever the distribution of inputs is. The set of learning rules is extended here to include a Hebb-like rule.


Motor Cortex Reference Signal Prefer Direction Learning Rule Population Vector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [I]
    Michael A.Arbib. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Yves Bumod, Philippe Grandguillaume, Isabelle Otto, Stefano Ferraina, Paul B. Johnson, and Roberto Caminiti. Visuomotor transformations underlying arm movements toward visual targets: A neural network model of cerebral cortical operations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 12 (4): 1435–1453, April 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Apostolos P. Georgopoulos. Reaching: Coding in Motor Cortex, chapter Part III Articles, pages 783–787. In A.Arbib [1], 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Apostolos P. Georgopoulos, Andrew B. Schwartz, and Ronald E. Kettner. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, 233: 1416–1419, August 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Pierre Germain and Yves Bumod. Population coding and hebbian learning. In Prof José Mira-Mira, editor, Proceedings of the Internationnal Conference on Brain Processes, Theories and Models. ICBP’95, MIT Press, 1995. also on the web: http://www.etca.fr/Users/Pierre%20Germain/english/index.html.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pierre Germain and Yves Burnod. Computational properties and auto-organization of a population of cortical neurons. ICNN’96, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Richard G. Palmer John Hertz, Anders Kroph. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. A Lecture Notes Volume in the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kenneth D. Miller and David J.C. MacKay. The role of constraint in hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 6: 100–126, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  2. 2.Neurosciences et ModélisationINSERM-CREAREPARISFrance

Personalised recommendations