Abstract
The hybrid method combining the early stages of a distance geometry program with molecular dynamics/simulated annealing in the presence of NMR constraints was optimized to obtain structures consistent with the observed NMR data. Two novel methods of stereospecific assignments of the protons at the prochiral carbons are used in simulated annealing, the “floating” chirality assignment and a high-dimensional potential. These two methods were compared with stereospecific assignments obtained from the coupling constant data. There is good agreement between the three methods in predicting the same stereospecific assignments. As the high-dimensional potential uses more relaxed absolute distance constraints and also takes into account the relative distance constraint patterns, it reduces possible overinterpretation of the NOE data. The structures obtained from the hybrid method were further refined using the relaxation matrix approach. This approach employs the analytical form of the gradient of the calculated spectrum. Compared to the structures determined with the two-spin approximation, the fit to the NMR data improves significantly with only minimal r.m.s. shifts in the structure during simple conjugate gradient minimization. The R-factors, defined similarly to the crystallographic R-factors, are 0.51 for the structures calculated using the two-spin approximation and 0.26 for the refined structures. Large shifts of approx. 1 Å occur during a dynamics/simulated annealing calculation. The various stages of refinement and stereospecific assignments are tested on the NOE data for the small squash trypsin inhibitor, CMTI-I. In the case of CMTI-I, the last step of the refinement improved the agreement with the X-ray structure significantly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
K. Wüthrich, in “NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids,” pp. 117–199, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1986).
R. Kaptein, E. R. P. Zuiderweg, R. M. Scheek, R. Boelens, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Mol. Biol. 182, 179–182 (1985).
T. A. Holak, J. H. Prestegard, and J. D. Forman, Biochemistry 26, 4652–4660 (1987).
T. A. Holak, S. K. Kearsley, Y. Kim, and J. H. Prestegard, Biochemistry 27, 6135–6142 (1988).
R. Kaptein, R. Boelens, R. M. Scheek, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Biochemistry 27, 5389–5395 (1988).
A. T. Brünger, G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, and M. Karplus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 3801–3805 (1986).
G. M. Clore and A. M. Gronenborn, C.R.C. in Biochemistry and Mol. Biol. 24, 479–564 (1989).
M. Nilges, A. M. Gronenborn, A. T. Brünger, and G. M. Clore, Protein Eng. 2, 27–38 (1988).
J. M. Moore, D. W. Case, W. J. Chazin, G. P. Gippert, T. F. Havel, R. Powls, and P. E. Wright, Science 240, 314–317 (1988).
M. J. Tappin, A. Pastore, R. S. Norton, J. H. Freer, and I. D. Campbell, Biochemistry 27, 1643–1647 (1988).
W. Braun and N. Gō, J. Mol. Biol. 186, 611–626 (1985).
K. Wüthrich, Science 243, 45–50 (1989).
W. Braun, Quart. Rev. Biophys. 19, 1115–1157 (1987).
G. Wagner, W. Braun, T. F. Havel, T. Schaumann, N. Gö, K. Wüthrich, J. Mol. Biol. 196, 611–639 (1987).
V. Saudek, R. J. P. Williams, and G. Ramponi, FEBS Lett. 242, 225–232 (1989).
T. F. Havel, and K. Wüthrich, J. Mol. Biol. 182, 281–294 (1985).
M. P. Williamson, T. F. Havel, and K. Wüthrich, J. Mol. Biol. 182, 295–315 (1985).
T. A. Holak, M. Nilges, J. H. Prestegard, A. M. Gronenborn, and G. M. Clore, Eur. J. Biochem. 175, 9–15 (1988b).
T. A. Holak, M. Nilges, and H. Oschkinat, FEBS Letters 242, 218–224 (1989).
P. L. Weber, R. Morrison, and D. Hare, J. Mol. Biol. 204, 483–487 (1988).
B. A. Borgias, M. Gochin, D. J. Kerwood, and T. L. James, Progress in NMR Spectr. 22, 83–100 (1990).
R. Boelens, T. M. G. Koning, G. A. Van der Marel, J. H. van Boom, and R. Kaptein, R., J. Magn. Reson. 82, 290–308 (1989).
P. Yip, and D. A. Case, J. Magn. Reson. 83, 643–648 (1989).
A. T. Brünger, J. Mol. Biol. 203, 803–816 (1988).
W. J. Metzler, D. R. Hare, and A. Pardi, Biochemistry 28, 7045–7052 (1989).
T. F. Havel, I. D. Kuntz, and G. M. Crippen, Bull. Mth. Biol. 45, 673–698 (1983).
V. C. Singh, and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem. 5, 129–145 (1984).
T. A. Holak, J. N. Scarsdale, and J. H. Prestegard, J. Magn. Reson. 74, 546–549 (1987).
K. Wüthrich, M. Billeter, and W. Braun, J. Mol. Biol. 169, 949–961 (1983).
T. A. Holak, D. Gondol, J. Otlewski, and T. Wilusz, J. Mol. Biol. 210, 635–648 (1989).
T. F. Havel, DISGEO, Quantum Chemistry Exchange, Program no. 507, Indiana University (1986).
J. Habazettl, C. Cieslar, H. Oschkinat, and T. A. Holak, FEBS Letters 268(1), 141–145 (1990).
S. G. Hyberts, W. Mäki, and G. Wagner, Eur. J. Biochem. 164, 625–635 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Habazettl, J., Nilges, M., Oschkinat, H., Brünger, A.T., Holak, T.A. (1991). NMR Structures of Proteins Using Stereospecific Assignments and Relaxation Matrix Refinement in a Hybrid Method of Distance Geometry and Simulated Annealing. In: Hoch, J.C., Poulsen, F.M., Redfield, C. (eds) Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. NATO ASI Series, vol 225. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9794-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9794-7_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9796-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9794-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive