Advertisement

Three Statistical Technologies with High Potential in Biological Imaging and Modeling

  • Moshe Fridman
  • J. Michael Steele
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 63)

Abstract

The three technologies that are surveyed here are (1) wavelet approximations, (2) hidden Markov models, and (3) the Markov chain Renaissance. The intention of the article is to provide an introduction to the benefits these technologies offer and to explain as far as possible the sources of their effectiveness. We also hope to suggest some useful relationships between these technologies and issues of importance on the agenda of biological and medical research.

Keywords

Markov Chain Simulated Annealing Hide Markov Model Gibbs Sampler State Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chui, C.K. (1992a), An Introduction to Wavelets. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Chui, C.K. (1992b), ed., Wavelets: A Tutorial in Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Coifman, R.R. and Meyer, Y. (1991), “Remarques sur l’analyse de Fourier â fenêtre,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I, 259–261.Google Scholar
  4. Daubechies, I. (1988), “Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 41, 909–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daubechies, I., (1992) Ten Lectures on Wavelets, SIAM Publications, Philadelphia PA.Google Scholar
  6. Duffin, R.J. and Schaeffer, A.C. (1952), “A class of nonharmonic Fourier series,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 72, 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gröchenig, G.K. (1991), “Describing functions: atomic decompositions versus frames,” Monatsh. Math., 112, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gröchenig, K. and Madych, W.R. (1992), “Multiresolution analysis, Haar bases and self-similar filings of V,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 38, 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kovaevie, J. and Vetterli, M. (1991), “Nonseparable multidimensional perfect reconstruction filter banks and wavelet bases for Nn, ” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 38, 533–535.Google Scholar
  10. Mallat, S. (1989), “Multiresolution approximation and wavelets,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 315, 69–88.Google Scholar
  11. Meyer, Y. (1990), Ondelettes ét opéateurs, I: Ondelettes, II: Opéatcurs dc CalderónZygrnund, III: Opéatcurs multilinéaires. Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, Y. (1993), Wavelets: Algorithms and Applications. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  13. Strang, G. (1993), “ Wavelet Transforms versus Fourier Transforms”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 28,2, 288–305.Google Scholar
  14. Ruskai, M.B., 13eylkin, G., Coffman, R.R., Daubechies, 1., Mallat, S. Meyer, Y. and Raphael, L. (1992), eds., Wavelets and their Applications. Jones and Bartlett, Boston.Google Scholar

HMM

  1. Aggoun, L. and Elliot, R.J. (1992), “Finite dimensional predictors for bidders Markov chains,” System Control Lett., 19, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, L.E. and Eagon, J.A. (1967). An inequality with applications to statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes and to a model of Ecology,” Bull. Arner. Math. Soc., 73, 360–363.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, L.E. and Petrie, T. (1966), “Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains,” Ann. Math. Statist., 37, 1554–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, L.E., Petrie, ’l’., Smiles, G. and Weiss, N. (1970), “A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains,” Ann. Math. Statist., 41. I61–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickel, P.J. and Ritov, Y. (1993), “Inference in hidden Markov models 1 Local asymptotic normality in the stationary case,” Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  6. Blackwell, D. and Koopmans, L. (1957), “On the identifiability problem for functions of finite Markov chains,” Ann. Math. Statist., 28, 1011–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung, S.H., Moore, J.B., Xia, L., Premkumar, L.S. and Gages, P.W. (1990), “Characterization of single channel currents using digital signal processing techniques based on hidden Markov models,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Land. Ser. B, 329, 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Churchill, G.A. (1989), “Stochastic models for heterogeneous DNA sequences,” Bull. Math. Biol., 51, 79–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Coast, l).A., Cano, G.G. and Briller, S.A. (1991), “Use of hidden Markov models for Electrocardiographic signal analysis,” J. of Electrocardiology, 23, 184–191.Google Scholar
  10. Forney, G.D. (1973), “The Viterbi algorithm,” Proc. IEEE, 61, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredkin, D.R. and Rice, J.A. (1992), “Bayesian restoration of single channel patch clamp recordings,” Biometrics,48, 427–448.Google Scholar
  12. Fridman, M. (1993), “Hidden Markov model regression,” Unpublished Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, E.J. (1959), “On the identifiability problem for functions of finite Markov chains,” Ann. Math. Statist.,30, 688–697.Google Scholar
  14. Guttorp, P., Newton, M.A. and Abkowitz, J.L. (1990), “A stochastic model for haematopoiesi in cats,” IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol.,7, 125–143.Google Scholar
  15. Juang, B.H. (1985), “Maximum Likelihood estimation for mixture multivariate stochastic observations of Markov chains,” AT T Tech. J.,64, 1235–1249.Google Scholar
  16. Juang, B.H., Levinson, S.E. and Sondhi, M.M. (1986), “Maximum likelihood estimation for multivariate mixture observations of Markov chains,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, IT-32, 307–309.Google Scholar
  17. Juang, B.H. and Rabiner, L.R. (1990), “The Segmental K-Means algorithm for estimating parameters of hidden Markov models,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process, ASSP-38, 1639–1641.Google Scholar
  18. Juang, B.H. and Rabiner, L.R. (1991), “Hidden Markov models for speech recognition,” Technometrics, 33, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khasminskii, R.Z., Lazareva, B.V. and Stapleton, J. (1993), “Some procedures for state estimation of a hidden Markov chain with two states,” Technical Report, Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  20. Kogan, J.A. (1991), “Optional reconstruction of Markov sequences through indirect observations,” 6th USSR-Japan Symp. on Probab. and Math. Statist., Kiev.Google Scholar
  21. Kullback, S. and Leibler, R.A. (1951), “On information and sufficiency,” Ann. Math. Statist., 22, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leroux, B.G. (1992), “Maximum-likelihood estimation for hidden Markov models,” Stochastic Process. Appl., 40, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levinson, S.E. (1986), “Continuously variable duration hidden Markov models for automatic speech recognition,” Computer, Speech and Language, 1, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liporace, L.A. (1982), “Maximum Likelihood estimation for multivariate observations of Markov sources,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory,IT-28, 729–734.Google Scholar
  25. Paul, D.B. (1985), “Training of HMM recognizers by simulated annealing,” Proc. ICASSP, New York: IEEE, 13–16.Google Scholar
  26. Petrie, T. (1969), “Probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains,” Ann. Math. Statist.,40, 97–115.Google Scholar
  27. Quandt, R.E. (1972), “A new approach to estimating switching regressions,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 67, 306–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quandt, R.E. and Ramsey, J.B. (1978), “Estimating mixtures of Normal distributions and switching regressions,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 73, 730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabiner, L.R. (1989), “A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition,” Proc. IEEE, 77, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viterbi, A.D. (1967), “Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimal decoding algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Inform.. Theory, IT-13, 260–269.Google Scholar

Markov Renaissance

  1. Albert, 3.H. and Chib, S. (1993), “Bayes inference via Gibbs sampling of autoregressive time series subject to Markov mean and variance shifts,” J. Bus. h’ Econ. Statist., 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. Besag, J. (1974), “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion),” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. 13, 36, 192–236.Google Scholar
  3. Besag, J. and Green, P.J. (1993), “Spatial statistics and Bayesian computations,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 55, 25–37.Google Scholar
  4. Cerny, V. (1985), “A thermodynamic approach to the traveling salesman problem: An efficient simulation”, J. Optirn.. Theory Appl.. 45, 41–51.Google Scholar
  5. Gelfand, A.E. and Smith, A.F.M. (1990), “Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 85, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984), “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Trans. Pattn Anal. Mae’i. Intcll., 6, 72 1741Google Scholar
  7. Geyer, C.J. (1991), “Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood,” Computer Science and Statistics: Proc. 2.3rd Swap. Interface, Fairfax Station: Interface Foundation, 156–163.Google Scholar
  8. Gilks, W.R., Clayton, D.G., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., McNeil, A.J., Sharpies, L.D. and Kirby, A.J. (1993), “Modelling complexity: Applications of Gibbs sampling in medicine,” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 55, 39–52.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D.S., Aragon, C., McGeoch, L. and Schevon, C. (1990), “Optimization by simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation, Part I: Graph partitioning,” Oper. Res., 37, 865–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, D.S., Aragon, C., McGeoch, L. and Schevon, C. (1991), “Optimization by simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation, Part II: Graph coloring and number partitioning,” Oper. Res., 39, 378–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, D.S., Aragon, C., McGeoch, L. and Schevon, C. (1992), “Optimization by simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation, Part III: The traveling salesman problem,” in preparation.Google Scholar
  12. IIajek, B. (1988), “Cooling schedules for optimal annealing,” Math. Oper. Res., 13, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hastings, W.K. (1970), “Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications,” Biometrika, 57, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelett, C.D. and Vecchi, M.P (1983), “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, 220, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H. and Teller, E. (1953), “Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines,” J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, A.F.M. and Roberts, G.O. (1993), “Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (with discussion),” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 55, 3–23.Google Scholar
  17. Tanner, M.A and Wong, W. (1987), “The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion),” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 82, 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tierney, L. (1991), “Exploring posterior distributions using Markov chains,” Computer Science and Statistics: Proc. 23rd Symp. Interface, Fairfax Station: Interface Foundation, 563–570.Google Scholar
  19. Zeger, S. and Rizaul Karim, M. (1991), Generalized linear models with random effects: A Gibbs sampling approach,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 86, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moshe Fridman
    • 1
  • J. Michael Steele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations