Color Conventions and Application Standards

  • J. D. Grossman
Part of the Defense Research Series book series (DRSS, volume 3)


The concept of “color conventions” refers to the idea that certain colors are familiarly associated with specific meanings. In fact, the terms color conventions and color meanings are generally synonymous. The term convention might also be used in a more limited sense where it describes consistency of meaning in a single application or specific context. Application standards, on the other hand, are specifically meant to govern the design of color display systems through standardized specifications or, at least, recommended practices. Whereas conventions describe what might be considered traditional color usage, application standards prescribe the application of color to system design. Developers of systems in which color electronic displays will be used for the man-machine interface should pay attention to both conventions and standards and, it is probably fair to say, should have a good rationale for designs which deviate from them.


United States Department Application Standard North Atlantic Treaty Organization American National Standard Institute Preliminary Draft 


  1. American National Standards Institute. (1988). American national standard for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations (ANSI/HFS Standard No. 100–1988 ). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.Google Scholar
  2. Canadian National Defense Staff. (1986). DGMEM standard for colour displays (OP1: DMES 5, 1986–05–01).Google Scholar
  3. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (1988, May). DIN 66234 Teil 5 Beiblatt 2: Bildschirmarbeitsplätze; Codierung von Information; Farbkombinationen [DIN 66234 Part 5 Supplement 2: Display work stations; coding of information; color combinations]. Berlin: Beuth.Google Scholar
  4. Dreyfuss, H. (1972). Symbol sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. International Standard Organization. (1988). Computer display color. Unpublished draft standard 924X.Google Scholar
  6. Merrifield, R. M., & Silverstein, L. D. (1986). The development and evaluation of color systems for airborne applications: fundamental visual, perceptual, and display system considerations (Tech. Report NADC-86011–60). Warminster, PA: Naval Air Development Center.Google Scholar
  7. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Standardization agreement—electronic colour display systems (STANAG 3940). Third preliminary draft.Google Scholar
  8. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (1989). Standardization agreement—display symbology and colors for NATO maritime units (STANAG 4420). Preliminary draft.Google Scholar
  9. Ota, Y. (1987). Pictogram design. Tokyo, Japan: Kashiwa Shobo Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Robinson, A., Sale, R., & Morrison, J. (1978). Elements of cartography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Society of Automotive Engineers. (1988). Human engineering considerations in the application of color to electronic aircraft displays (ARP 4032 ). Warrendale, PA: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Spiker, V.A., Rogers, S.P., & Cicinelli, J. (1986). Selecting color codes for a computer-generated topographic map based on perception experiments and functional requirements. Ergonomics, 29, 1313–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taylor, R.M. (1984). Color coding in information displays: heuristics, evidence and experience from cartography. In C.P. Gibson (Ed.), Proceedings of NATO Workshop on Colour Coded vs Monochrome Electronic Displays (pp. 35.1–35. 46 ). Farnborough, England: Royal Aircraft Establishment.Google Scholar
  14. United States General Services Administration. (1951). Federal Standard No. 3. Colors, Aeronautical Lighting. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  15. United States Department of Defense. (1970). MIL-STD-411D. Aircrew station signals. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  16. United States Department of Defense. (1981). MIL-STD-1472C. Human engineering designcriteria for military systems, equipment and facilities. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  17. United States Department of Defense. (1987). MIL-C-25050A (ASG). Colors, aeronautical lights and lighting equipment, general requirements for. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  18. United States Department of Defense. (1988). MIL-L-85762A. Lighting, aircraft interior, night vision imaging system (NVIS) compatible. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Grossman
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Naval Ocean Systems CenterSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations