Skip to main content

A Model for Contextual Interference Effects in Motor Learning

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

There exists substantial evidence that practice under conditions of high contextual interference can facilitate retention and transfer performance (Magill & Hall, 1990). Contextual interference refers to the situation in which there is interference among different tasks being learned across practice trials. Practice under a condition of high contextual interference (e.g., when multiple tasks are practiced in a random order) typically results in less proficient performance than practice under a condition of low contextual interference (e.g., when multiple tasks are practiced in a blocked order). These findings are reversed for retention and transfer tests, however, with performance being more proficient for the high contextual interference practice condition than for the low contextual interference practice condition. This phenomenon has attracted wide interest among motor skill researchers because it is counter to the common assumption that practice in situations with little or no interference is most advantageous for learning. We describe a contextual interference experiment and prevailing explanations for its findings. We then describe a hybrid connectionist model for contextual interference that has been successful in predicting empirical findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dickinson, J., & Higgins, N. (1977). Release from practive and retroactive interference in short-term memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, and I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3–22 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., McAllister, D. E., & Adams, J. A. (1951). Facilitation and interference in performance on the modified Mashburn apparatus: I. The effects of varying the amount of original learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 247–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., & Kuhlman, C. K. (1961). Proactive and retroactive effects of overlearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. (1990). Cognitive theories of skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. B., & Wright, D. L. (1991). When forgetting benefits motor retention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 293–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345–366 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1988). Knowledge of incorporation in motor representation. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 289–314 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titzer, R. C. (1991). The influence of a reminder on the contextual interference effect. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shea, J.B., Graf, R.C. (1994). A Model for Contextual Interference Effects in Motor Learning. In: Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Cognitive Assessment. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9730-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9730-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9732-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9730-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics