Abstract
There exists substantial evidence that practice under conditions of high contextual interference can facilitate retention and transfer performance (Magill & Hall, 1990). Contextual interference refers to the situation in which there is interference among different tasks being learned across practice trials. Practice under a condition of high contextual interference (e.g., when multiple tasks are practiced in a random order) typically results in less proficient performance than practice under a condition of low contextual interference (e.g., when multiple tasks are practiced in a blocked order). These findings are reversed for retention and transfer tests, however, with performance being more proficient for the high contextual interference practice condition than for the low contextual interference practice condition. This phenomenon has attracted wide interest among motor skill researchers because it is counter to the common assumption that practice in situations with little or no interference is most advantageous for learning. We describe a contextual interference experiment and prevailing explanations for its findings. We then describe a hybrid connectionist model for contextual interference that has been successful in predicting empirical findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dickinson, J., & Higgins, N. (1977). Release from practive and retroactive interference in short-term memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 61–66.
Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, and I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3–22 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lewis, D., McAllister, D. E., & Adams, J. A. (1951). Facilitation and interference in performance on the modified Mashburn apparatus: I. The effects of varying the amount of original learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 247–260.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
Mandler, G., & Kuhlman, C. K. (1961). Proactive and retroactive effects of overlearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 76–81.
Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.
Masson, M. E. J. (1990). Cognitive theories of skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 231–239.
Shea, J. B., & Wright, D. L. (1991). When forgetting benefits motor retention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 293–301.
Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 345–366 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1988). Knowledge of incorporation in motor representation. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behavior: The motor-action controversy (pp. 289–314 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Titzer, R. C. (1991). The influence of a reminder on the contextual interference effect. Unpublished master’s thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shea, J.B., Graf, R.C. (1994). A Model for Contextual Interference Effects in Motor Learning. In: Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Cognitive Assessment. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9730-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9730-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9732-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9730-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive