Advertisement

Craspedacusta Sowerbii: An Analysis of an Introduced Species

  • Thomas S. Acker

Abstract

The ecology of Craspedacusta sowerbii Lankester, a fresh-water cnidarian, is a source of interest and confusion for many biologists. The medusoid stage draws special attention because in common parlance at least, “jellyfish do not belong in fresh-water.” For the investigator, on the other hand, this same stage causes puzzlement since the medusae occur only infrequently. Both factors have led to an expanded literature. Russell (1953) in his first volume of The Medusae of the British Isles, compiled a separate but not exhaustive bibliography containing 150 entries on this species. In the light of this rather large and at times conflicting literature, Acker and Muscat (1976) reviewed the information with the purpose of defining more clearly the questions that need to be asked of its ecology. This paper continues that approach by considering the implications of C. sowerbii’s original habitat, suggesting the factors that control medusoid formation, and explaining the probable reasons for the sporadic appearance of medusa populations.

Keywords

British Isle Original Habitat Polyp Stage Medusoid Stage Sporadic Appearance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Acker, T.S. and A.M. Muscat, 1976. Ecology of Craspedacusta sowerbii Lankester, a freshwater Hydrozoan. Am. Midl. Nat., 95: 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunham, D.W., 1941. Studies on the ecology and physiology of the freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbii. Ph.D. thesis. Ohio State University, 121 pp. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mi. (Diss. Abstr. 36: 57-62).Google Scholar
  3. Goetsch, W. 1927. Die Geschlechtsverhältnisse der Susswasserhydroiden und ihre experimentelle Beeinflussung. Roux Arch. Entw-Mech., 111: 173–249.Google Scholar
  4. Goy, J., 1973. Gonionemus suvaensis. Structural Characters, Developmental Stages and Ecology. Publ. Seto Marine Biol. Lab., 20: 525–536.Google Scholar
  5. Kramp, P.L., 1950. Freshwater Medusae in China, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 120: 165–184, 2 plates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lytle, CF., 1959. Studies on the Developmental Biology of Craspedacusta. Ph.D. thesis. Indiana University, 116 pp. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mi. (Diss. Abstr. 20: 1491).Google Scholar
  7. Lytle, CF. 1962. Craspedacusta in Southeastern United States, Tulane Stud. Zool., 9: 309–314.Google Scholar
  8. McClary, A., 1959. Growth and differentiation in Craspedacusta sowerbii. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of Michigan, 101 pp. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mi. (Diss. Abstr. 21: 381).Google Scholar
  9. Payne, F., 1924. A study of the freshwater medusae, Craspedacusta ryderi. J. Morph., 38: 387–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reisinger, E., 1957. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und Entwicklungsmechanik von Craspedacusta (Hydrozoa, Limnotrachylina). Z. Morph. u. Okol. Tiere, 45: 656–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Russell, F.S., 1953. The Medusae of the British Isles I: Anthomedusae, Leptomedusae, Limnomedusae, Trachymedusae, and Narcomedusae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 530 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Stolte, H.A., 1928. Analyse der Bedingungen für Knospung und Sexualitat bei Hydra attenuata Pallas. Biol. Zbl. 48(5): 273–302.Google Scholar
  13. Uchida, T. and S. Kimura, 1933. Notes on fresh-water medusae in Asia. Annot. zool. jap., 14: 123–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Acker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations