Advertisement

The P300 Event-Related Brain Potential in Psychiatric and Neurological Diagnosis

  • J. P. Rosenfeld
Part of the The Plenum Series in Behavioral Psychophysiology and Medicine book series (SSBP)

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is the record of voltage recorded from the human scalp (as a function of time) that is thought to be attributable to underlying cortical (brain) activity. P300 (P3) is an EEG-derived event-related potential (ERP) recordable from the human scalp using EEG-type electrodes and physiological recording parameters (for a detailed description, see Fabiani, Gratton, Karis, & Donchin, 1987). The word “event” in “event-related potential” refers to the external physical or internal psychological event that causes the deflection (in the ongoing EEG) that defines the ERP. A quarter of a century ago, the term “evoked potential” was used to describe EEG deflections caused by external stimuli (e.g., light flashes, tones). The deflections were known to be related to cortical sensory neuronal activity occurring synchronously on the arrival in the cortex of the neuronal activity evoked by the discrete sensory—physical event. It is now known that other events, i.e., events not of a sensory nature, are also associable with distinct EEG deflections, and thus the more general term ERP was developed and understood to include such special cases or subcategories as sensory evoked potentials. Hillyard (1985) has provided a concise review of the approximately half dozen well-studied psychologically related ERPs, including the P3 wave.

Keywords

Oddball Paradigm Oddball Task Dual Task Paradigm Human Scalp Ischemic Pain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Diner, B. C., Holcomb, P. J., & Dykman, R. A. (1985). P300 in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 15, 175–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donchin, E., & Coles, M G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Donchin, E., Kramer, A., & Wickens, C. (1986). Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In M. Coles, S. Porges, & E. Donchin (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, processes and applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan-Johnson, C. (1981). P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology, 18, 207–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fabiani, M., Grafton, G., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1987). The definition, identification, and reliability of measurement of the P300 component of the event-related potential. In P. K. Acides, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology, Vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hillyard, S. A. (1985). Electrophysiology of human selective attention. Trends in Neurosciences, September 1985, 400–405.Google Scholar
  9. Leiphart, J. W, & Rosenfeld, J. P. (1991). Study of depression using P300 in the dual task paradigm. Psychophysiology, 28, S37 (abstract).Google Scholar
  10. Polich, J., Ladish, C., & Bloom, E E. (1990). P300 assessment of early Alzheimer’s disease. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 77, 179–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenfeld, J. P., & Kim, M. (1991). Ongoing pain as a mental workload indexed by P300 depression: Discrimination of real and feigned pain conditions. Psychophysiology, 28, 336–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenfeld, J. P, Angell, A., Johnson, M., & Qian, J. (1991). An ERP-based control-question lie detector analog: Algorithms for discriminating effects within individual waveforms. Psychophysiology, 28, 320–336.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenfeld, J. P., Bhat, K., Miltenberger, A., & Johnson, M. (1992). Event-related potentials in the dual task paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 221–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosenfeld, J. P., Johnson, M. M., Koo, J. (1993). Ongoing ischemic pain as a workload indexed by P3 amplitude and latency in real-versus feigned-pain conditions. Psychophysiology, 30, 253–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., John, E. R. (1965). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187–1188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Syndulko, K., Hansch, E. C., Cohen, S. N., Pearce, J. W, Goldberg, Z., Morton, B., Tourtellotte, W. W, & Potvin, A. K. (1982). Long-latency event-related potentials in normal aging and dementia. In J. Courjon, F. Mauguiere, & M. Revol (Eds.), Clinical applications of evoked potentials in neurology, (pp. 279–285 ). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Rosenfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations