Advertisement

Pheromonal Communication between Plants

  • David F. Rhoades
Part of the Recent Advances in Phytochemistry book series (RAPT, volume 19)

Abstract

It has become generally accepted that plant secondary metabolites constitute an important defense of plants against attack by herbivores and other consumers.1–3 It is also becoming clear that plants are far from static resources to herbivores, as had been widely assumed in the past. Plant nutritional quality to herbivores can vary with the degree of both physical and biotic stress experienced by plants. Physical stresses such as drought, waterlogging, depletion of soil nutrients, frost damage, and pollution often increase susceptibility of plants to herbivores.4–6 In physically stressed plants, this increased susceptibility appears to be due to a combination of increased content of amino acids and other nutrients,7,9 and lowered commitment to defense.5,6 Reports of decreased nutritional quality to herbivores, as measured in bioassays or increased content of defensive compounds, in plants previously attacked by herbivores or experiencing current attack, are becoming increasingly common.6,10,11,17 Defensive responses of plants to attack by herbivores have been reported in as many as 29 species in 13 families including herbs, grasses, a sedge, a vine and trees, so these responses may be universal.

Keywords

Test Tree Leaf Quality Undamaged Plant PHEROMONAL Communication Fall Webworm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    WALLACE, J.W., R.L. MANSELL, eds. 1976. Biochemical interaction between plants and insects. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 10, Plenum Press, New York, 425 pp.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    HARBORNE, J.B. 1978. Biochemical aspects of plant and animal coevolution, Academic Press, New York, 435 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ROSENTHAL, G.A., D.H. JANZEN, eds. 1979. Herbivores: their interaction with plant secondary metabolites, Academic Press, New York, 718 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MATTSON, W.J., N.D. ADDY. 1975. Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science 190: 515–522.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    RHOADES, D.F. 1979. In G.A. Rosenthal, D.H. Janzen, eds., op. cit. Reference 3, pp. 3–54.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    RHOADES, D.F. 1983. In Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. (R.F. Denno, M.S. McClure, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 155–220.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    WHITE, T.C.R. 1969. An index to measure weather-induced stress of trees associated with outbreaks of psyllids in Australia. Ecology 50: 905–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    WHITE, T.C.R. 1974. A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars with special reference to populations of Selidosema suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Oecologia 16: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WHITE, T.C.R. 1976. Weather, food, and plagues of locusts. Oecologia 22: 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    BENZ, G. 1977. Eucarpia/IOBC working group breeding for resistance to insects and mites. Bull. SROP 1977/3. (Report from 1st meeting held at Wageningen, The Netherlands, 7–9 Dec. 1976, pp. 155–159 ).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    HAUKIOJA, E. 1980. On the role of plant defenses in the fluctuation of herbivore populations. Oikos 35: 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    BALTENSWEILER, W. 1968. In Insect abundance. (T.R.E. Southwood, ed.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    FYE, R.E. 1974. In Proceedings of the summer institute on biological control of plant insects and diseases. (F.G. Maxwell, F.A. Harris, eds.), Univ. Miss. Press, Jackson, pp. 46–61.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    STEHR, F.W. 1974. In F.G. Maxwell, F.A. Harris, eds., op. cit. Reference 13, pp. 124–136.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    WATERS, W.E., R.W. STARK. 1980. Forest pest management: concept and reality. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25: 479–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    HAUKIOJA, E., T. HAKALA. 1975. Herbivore cycles and periodic outbreaks. Formulation of a general hypothesis. Rep. Kevo Subarctic Res. Stat. 12: 1–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    RHOADES, D.F. 1984. Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory. Am. Nat. (in press).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    RHOADES, D.F. 1983. Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 208: 55–68.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    SWAIN, T.S., W.E. HILLIS. 1959. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. I. The quantitative analysis of phenol constituents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 10: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    RASMUSSEN, R.A. 1972. What do hydrocarbons from trees contribute to air pollution? J. Air Poll. Contr. Assoc. 22: 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    RASMUSSEN, R.A. 1970. Isoprene: identified as a forest-type emission to the atmosphere. Env. Sci. Technol. 8: 667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WALDBAUER, G.P. 1968. In Advances in insect physiology. (J.W.L. Beament, J.E. Treherne, V.B. Wigglesworth, eds.), Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 229–288.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    BALDWIN, I.T., J.C. SCHULTZ. 1983. Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221: 277–279.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    PERRY, D.A., G.B. PITMAN. 1983. Genetic and environmental influence in host resistance to herbivory: Douglas-fir and the western spruce budworm. Z. Ang. Ent. 96: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DODSON, C.H. 1970. The role of chemical attractants in orchid pollination. Annu. Biol. Colloquiam, Corvallis, Oregon 1968 29: 83–107.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    BERGSTROM, G. 1978. In J.B. Harborne, ed., op. cit. Reference 2, pp. 207–231.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    NURSTEIN, H.E. 1970. In The biochemistry of fruits and their products. (A.C. Hulme, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 239–268.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    BURG, S.P. 1965. The physiology of ethylene formation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 13: 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    PRATT, H.K., J.D. GOESCHL. 1969. Physiological roles of ethylene in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 17: 541–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ABELES, F.B. 1973. Ethylene in plant biology. Academic Press, New York, 302 pp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    HANOVER, J.W. 1972. Factors affecting the release of volatile chemicals by forest trees. Mitt. First Bundes-Versuch. Wien 97: 625–645.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ROBINSON, E., R.A. RASMUSSEN, H.H. WESTBERG, M.W. HOLDREN. 1973. Non-urban, non-methane, low molecular weight hydrocarbon concentrations related to air mass identification. J. Geophys. Res. 78: 5345–5351.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    FREELAND, W.J. 1980. Insect flight times and atmospheric hydrocarbons. Am. Nat. 116: 736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    SMITH, W.H. 1981. Air pollution and forests. Springer-Verlag, New York, 379 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    MAJOR, R.T., P. MARCHINI, A.J. BOULTON. 1963. Observations on the production of a-hexenal by leaves of certain plants. J. Biol. Chem. 238: 1813–1816.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    SUMIMOTO, M., M. SHIRAGA, T. KONDO. 1975. Ethane in pine needles preventing the feeding of the beetle Monochamus alternatus. J. Insect Physiol. 21: 713–722.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    WENT, F.W. 1960. Blue hazes in the atmosphere. Nature 187: 641–643.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    WESTBERG, H.H., R.A. RASMUSSEN. 1972. Atmosphere phytochemical reactivity of monoterpene hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 4: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    YANG, S.F., H.K. PRATT. 1968. In Biochemistry of wounded plant tissues. (G. Kahl, ed.), Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp. 595–622.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    BOLLER, T., H. KENDE. 1980. Regulation of wound ethylene in plants. Nature 286: 259–264.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    WILLIAMSON, C.E. 1950. Ethylene, a metabolic product of diseased or injured plants. Phytopathology 40: 205–208.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    WILLIAMSON, C.E., A.W. DIMMOCK. 1953. Ethylene from diseased plants. Yearbook of Agriculture (USDA), pp. 881–886.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    SHAIN, L., W.E. HILLIS. 1972. Ethylene production in Pinus radiata in response to Sirex-Amylostereum attack. Phytopathology 62: 1407–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    NYE, W., H.A. SPOEHR. 1943. The isolation of hexenal from leaves. Arch. Biochem. 2: 23–35.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    RADWAN, M.A., W.D. ELLIS. 1975. Clonal variation in monoterpene hydrocarbon vapors of Douglas-fir foliage. For. Sci. 21: 63–67.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    LEVIN, D.A. 1971. Plant phenolics: an ecological perspective. Am. Nat. 105: 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    KIRALY, Z. 1980. In Plant disease. (J.G. Horsfall, E.B. Cowling, eds.), Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    RHOADES, D.F. 1977. In Creosote bush. (T.J. Mabry, J.H. Hunziker, D.R. DiFeo, eds.), Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsberg, PA, pp. 135–175.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    CHRISTOFFERSON, R.E., G.C. LATIES. 1982. Ethylene regulation of gene expression in carrots. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 79: 4060–4063.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    ABELES, F.B., R.P. BOSSHART, L.E. FORRENCE, W.H. HABIG. 1971. Preparation and purification of glucanase and chitinase from bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 47: 129–134.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    CHROMINSKI, A., S. NEUMANN VISSCHER, R. JERENKA. 1982. Exposure to ethylene changes nymphal growth rate and female longevity in the grasshopper Melanopus sanguinipes. Naturwissenschaften 69: (in press).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    GRAHAM, B.F. JR., F.H. BORMANN. 1966. Natural root grafts. Bot. Rev. 32: 255–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    EPSTEIN, A.H. 1978. Root graft transmission of tree pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 16: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    ATSATT, P.R. 1970. Biochemical bridges between vascular plants. Annu. Biol. Colloquiam, Corvallis, Oregon 1968 29: 53–68.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    HARLEY, J.L., S.E. SMITH. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • David F. Rhoades
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations