Predator-Odor Analgesia in Deer Mice: Neuromodulatory Mechanisms and Sex Differences

  • Martin Kavaliers
  • Duncan Innes
  • Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp

Abstract

Animals respond to the threat of predation with a number of defensive behaviors, including: flight, immobilization or ‘freezing’, risk assessment, increased wariness and the suppression of non-defensive behaviors (Blanchard et al. 1990). It has become evident that a reduction in nociceptive and pain sensitivity (antinociception or analgesia, respectively) is a also a major correlate of predator exposure. Activation of endogenous analgesic mechanisms has been demonstrated in laboratory mice and rats exposed to a cat (Lester and Fanselow, 1985; Lichtman and Fanselow, 1990; Kavaliers and Colwell, 1991, 1992), deer mice and white-footed mice exposed to a weasel (Kavaliers, 1988, 1990), and laboratory mice exposed to the calls of avian predators (Hendrie, 1991). There is mounting evidence that these analgesic responses are an important component of an animal’s defense repertoire. Defensive systems that are activated by either innate or learned danger stimuli, such as that of predators, may inhibit nociceptive and pain sensivitity (i.e. induce analgesia) associated with either the perception of, defense against, and/or recuperatio;l from the danger stimuli (Bolles and Fanselow, 1980). As such, analgesia is advantageous in predator exposure, in which responding to noxious stimulation might compete with and/or disrupt effective defensive behaviors.

Keywords

Depression Cage Morphine Serotonin Immobilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amit, N., and Galina, Z.H., 1986, Stress-induced analgesia: adaptive pain suppression, Physiol. Rev 30:561–602.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, D. C., Shepherd, J. K., Rodgers, R. J., Agulla, R., Flores, T., and Blanchard, R. J., 1991, Sex differences in antipredator defensive reactions and the effects of anxiolytic drugs, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr 17:877.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R.J., Blanchard, C.D., Rodgers, J., and Weiss, S.M., 1990, The characterization and modelling of antipredator defensive behavior, Neurosci. Biobehay. Rev 14:463–472.Google Scholar
  4. Bodnar, R.J., Romero, M.T., and Kramer, E., 1988, Organismic variables and pain inhibition: roles of gender and aging, Brain Res. Bull 21:947–953.Google Scholar
  5. Bolles, R.C., and Fanselow, M.S., 1980. A perceptual-recuperative model of fear and pain, Behay. Brain Sci 3:291–323.Google Scholar
  6. Crump, D.R., 1980, Thietanes and dithiolanes from the anal gland of stoat (Mustela erminea), J. Chem. Ecol 6:341–347.Google Scholar
  7. Crump, D.R., and Moors, P.J., 1985, Anal gland secretions from the stoat (Mustela erminea) and the ferret (Mustela putorius forma furo): Some additional thietane components, J. Chem. Ecol 11:1037–1043.Google Scholar
  8. Cushing, B.S., Estrous mice and vulnerability to weasel predation, Ecology 66: 1976–1978.Google Scholar
  9. Dourish, C.T., Huston, P.M., and Curson, G., 1986. Putative anxiolytics 8-OH-DPAT, buspirone and TVX Q are agonists at 5-HT1A autoreceptors on the raphe nuclei, Trends Pharmacol. Sci 7:212–214.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, E. R., 1981, “The Mammals of North America, Vol. 2, ” WileyInterscience, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hammer, R.P., Jr., 1990, p-Opiate receptor binding in the medial preoptic area is cyclical and sexually dimorphic, Brain Res 515: 187–192.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrie, C.A., 1991, The calls of murine predators activate endogenous analgesia mechanisms in laboratory mice, Physiol. Behay 49:569–573.Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch, S.M., and Bolles, R.C., 1980, On the ability of prey to recognize predators, Z. Tierpsychol 54:71–84.Google Scholar
  14. Innes, D.G.L., and Kavaliers, M., 1987, Opiates and deer mouse behaviour: differences between island and mainland populations Can. J. Zool 65:2504–2512.Google Scholar
  15. Johnston, A.L., and File, S.E., 1991, Sex differences in animal tests of anxiety, Physiol. Behay 49:245–250.Google Scholar
  16. Kavaliers, M., 1988, Brief exposure to a natural predator, the short-tailed weasel, induces benzodiazepine-sensitive analgesia in white-footed mice, Physiol. Behay 43:187–193.Google Scholar
  17. Kavaliers, M., 1990, Responsiveness of deer mice to a predator, the short-tailed weasel: population differences and neuromodulatory mechanisms Physiol. Zool 63:388–407.Google Scholar
  18. Kavaliers, M., and Colwell, D.D., 1991, Sex differences in opioid and non-opioid mediated predator-induced analgesia in mice, Brain Res submitted.Google Scholar
  19. Kavaliers, M., and Colwell, D.D., 1992, parasite modification of predator responses in mice: nociceptive models and neuromodulatory mechanisms, Anim. Behay in press.Google Scholar
  20. Kennet, G.A., Chaouloff, F., Marcou, M., and Curzon, G., 1986. Femalerats are more vulnerable than males in animal models of depression: the possible role of serotonin. Brain Res 382: 416–421.Google Scholar
  21. Lester, L.S., and Fanselow, F.S., 1985, Exposure to a cat produces opioid analgesia in rats, Behay. Neuros A 99:756–759.Google Scholar
  22. Lichtman, A.H., and Fanselow, M.S., 19)0, Cats produce analgesia in rats on the tail-flick test: naltrexone sensitivity is determined by the nociceptive test stimulus, Brain Res., 533: 91–94.Google Scholar
  23. Rodgers, R. J., and Randall, J. I., 1937, Defensive analgesia in rats and mice. Psychol. Rec 37:335–347.Google Scholar
  24. Rodgers, R. J., and Shepherd, J. K., 1989, 5-HT agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(din-propylamino)tetralin (8–0H-DPAT) inhibits non-opioíd analgesia in defeated mice: influence of route of injection. Psychopharmacologv 97: 163–165.Google Scholar
  25. Rodgers, R. J., Shepherd, J. K., and Donat, P., 1991, Differential effects of novel ligands for 5-H“ receptor subtypes on non-opioid defensive analgesia in mice. Neurosci. Biobehay. Rev in press.Google Scholar
  26. Simerly, R. B., McCall, L. D., and Watson, S. J., 1988. Distribution of opioid peptides in the pre-optic region: immunohistochemical evidence for a steroid-sensitive enkephalin sexual dimorphism. J. Comp. Neurol 276:442–459.Google Scholar
  27. Sullivan, T.D., Crump, D.R., and Sullivan, D.S., 1988, Use of predator odors as repellants to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. III Montane and meadow voles (Microtus montanus and Microtus pennsylvanicus), J. Chem. Ecol 14:363–377.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Kavaliers
    • 1
  • Duncan Innes
    • 1
  • Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry and Department of PsychologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations