Advertisement

Odor Discrimination in Female Mice after Long-Term Exposure to Male Odors: Genotype-Environment Interaction

  • N. Kenneth Sandnabba

Abstract

It has been shown in several studies that female mice are capable of selecting males on the basis of certain odor cues indicative of genetic quality (e.g. Yamazaki et al., 1978, 1979; Lenington and Egid, 1985; Sandnabba 1986a; Novotny et al., 1990). Feriale mice have also been found to show a preference for male odors of high ranking and aggressive individuals (Scott and Pfaff, 1970; Jones and Nowell, 1974; Sandnabba, 1985; 1986b). An interesting question arising from these observations is whether a dominant and highly aggressive male is always preferred, independent of genotype.

Keywords

Female Mouse Experimental Female Aggressive Male Congenic Mouse Odor Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldhous, P., 1990, Olfactory recognition cues and the development of intra-sexual kin discrimination in male laboratory mice, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5,” D. W. Macdonald, D. Mller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynzuk, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Fillion, T. B., and Blass, E. M., 1986, Infantile experience with suckling odours determines adult sexual behaviour in male rats, Science, 231: 729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hepper, P. G., 1986, Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms. A review, Biol. Rev., 61: 63.Google Scholar
  4. Jones, R. B., and Nowell, N. W., 1974, A comparison of the aversive and female attractant properties of trine from dominant and sub-ordinate male mice, Anim. Learn. Behay., s: 141.Google Scholar
  5. Keverne, E. B., 1983, Pheromonal influences on the endocrine regulation of reproduction, Trends Neurosci., E: 381.Google Scholar
  6. Lagerspetz, K. M. J., 1964, “Studies or. the Aggressive Behaviour of Mice,” Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  7. Lagerspetz, K. M. J., and Lagerspetz, F. Y. H., 1983, Genes and aggression, in: “Aggressive Behavior: Genetic and Neural Approaches,” E. C. Simmel, and M. Hahn, eds, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  8. Lenington, S., and Egid, K., 1985, Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T-locus: a response to T-locus or H-2 locus variability, Behay. Genet., 15: 53.Google Scholar
  9. Mainardi, D., 1964, Relations between early experience and sexual preferences in female mice, Atti Associazione Genetica Italiana, 9: 141.Google Scholar
  10. Novotny, M., Jemiolo, B., and Harvey, 5., 1990, Chemistry of rodent pheromones: molecular insights into ctemical signalling in mammals, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5,” D. W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynczuk, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Sandnabba, N. K., 1985, Differences in the capacity of male odours to affect investigatory behaviour and different urinary marking patterns in two strains of mice, selectively bred for high and low aggressiveness, Behay. Process., 11: 257.Google Scholar
  12. Sandnabba, N. K., 1986a, “Heredity, Fighting Experience and Odour Cues: Factors Determining the Aggressive Interaction in Mice,” Department of Psychology at Abo Akademi, Turku.Google Scholar
  13. Sandnabba, N. K., 1986b, Effects of selective breeding for high and low aggressiveness and of fighting experience on odor discrimination in mice, Aggressive Behay., 12: 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandnabba, N. K., Differences between aggressive and non-aggressive mice in odour signals and marking behaviour, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5,” D. W. Macdonald, D. Mller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynczuk, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Scott, J. W., and Pfaff, D. W., 1970, Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of female mice to male urine odors, Physiol. Behay., 5: 407.Google Scholar
  16. Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, J., Andrews, P. W., Peake, V., and Boyce, E. A., 1978, Mating preferences of F2 segregants of crosses between MHCcongenic mouse strains, Immunogenetics, 6: 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, J., Andrews, P. W., Peake, V., Boyce, E. A., and Thomas, L., 1979, Recognition among mice: evidence from the use of Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types, J. Exp. Med., 150: 755.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Kenneth Sandnabba
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAbo Akademi UniversityAboFinland

Personalised recommendations