A Primer of Olfactory Communications about Distant Foods in Norway Rats

  • Bennett G. GalefJr.


During a brief period of social interaction, a naive Norway rat (an observer) can extract information from a recently fed conspecific (a demonstrator) sufficient to allow the observer to identify the diet that its demonstrator ate. In our standard procedure (Galef and Wigmore, 1983), each observer rat first interacted for 15 min with a demonstrator rat that had eaten either cinnamon- or cocoa-flavored diet (Diet Cin or Diet Coc). The observer was then isolated and offered a choice between Diets Cin and Coc for 22 hr. In such experiments, observer rats exhibit enhanced preferences for whatever diet their respective demonstrator ate (Galef et al., 1984).


Carbon Disulfide Diet Preference Olfactory Communication Combination Diet Purina Chow 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bean, N.J., Galef, B.G., Jr., and Mason, J.R., 1989, At biologically significant concentrations, carbon disulfide both attracts mice and increases their consumption of bait. J. Wildl. Manage., 52: 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1986a, Olfactory communication among rats of information concerning distant diets, in “Chemical Signais in Vertebrates, vol. IV: Ecology, Evolution, and Comparative Biology”. D. Duvall, D. Muller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1986h, Social interaction modifies learned aversions, sodium appetite, and both palatability and handling-time induced dietary preference in rats (R. norvegicus), J. Comp. Psychol., 100: 432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1987, Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway rats. Anim. Learn. Behay., 15: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1988, Communication of information concerning distant diets in a social, central-place foraging species: Rattus norvegicus, in “Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives”. T.R. Zentall and B.G. Galef, Jr. eds., Lawrence Erlhaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Galet, B.G, Jr., 1989a, An adaptationist perspective on social learning, social feeding and social foraging in Norway rats, in “Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology”, D.A. Dewsbury, ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1989b, Enduring social enhancement of rats’ preferences for the palatable and the piquant. Appetite, 13: 81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1989c, Socially-mediated attenuation of taste-aversion learning in Norway rats: Preventing development of “food phobias.” Anim. Learn. Behay., 17: 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1990a, An historical perspective on recent studies of social learning about foods by Norway rats. Can. J. Psychol., 44: 311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galet, B.G., Jr., 1990b, Necessary and sufficient conditions for communication of diet preferences by Norway rats, Anim. Learn. Behay., 18: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galef, B.G., Jr., 1991, Innovations in the study of social learning in animals: A developmental perspective, in “Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Developmental Psychobiology”, H.N. Shair, G.A. Barr, and M.A. Hofer eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Galef, R.G., Jr., 1991a, Information centres of Norway rats: Sites for information exchange and information parasitism, Anim. Behay., 41: 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galet, B.G., Jr., Attenborough, K.S. and Whiskin, E., 1990, Responses of observer rats to complex, diet-related signals emitted by demonstrator rats. J. Comp. Psychol., 104: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galef, B.G., Jr., Kennett, D.J., and Stein, M., 1985, Demonstrator influence on observer diet preference: Effects of simple exposure and the presence of a demonstrator. Anim. Learn. Behay., 13: 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galef, B.G., Jr., Kennett, U.J., and Wigmore, S.W., 1984, Transfer of information concerning distant foods in rats: A robust phenomenon. Anim. Learn. Behay., 12: 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galet, B.G., Jr., Mason, J.R., Preti, G. and Bean, N.J., 1988, Carbon disulfide: A semiochemical mediating socially-induced diet choice in rats. Physiol. Behay., 42: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galef, B.G., Jr., and Stein, M., 1985, Demonstrator influence on observer diet preference: Analyses of critical social interactions and olfactory signals. Anim. Learn. Behay., 13: 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galef, B.G., Jr. and Whiskin, E.E., in press, Social transmission of information about multiflavored foods. J. Comp. Psychol.Google Scholar
  19. Galet, B.G., Jr. and Wigmore, S.W., 1983, Transfer of information concerning distant foods: A laboratory investigation of the “information-centre” hypothesis. Anim. Behay., 31: 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mason, J.R., Bean, N.J. and Galet, B.G., Jr., 1989, Attractiveness of carbon disulfide to wild Norway rats, in “Proceedings of the Thirteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference”, A.C. Crabh and R.E. Marsh eds., University of California Press, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Ward, P., and Zahavi, E., 1973, The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information-centres” for food-finding. Ibis, 115: 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bennett G. GalefJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations