Advertisement

Taxonomic Differences between Birds and Mammals in Their Responses to Chemical Irritants

  • J. Russell Mason
  • Larry Clark
  • Pankaj S. Shah

Abstract

Ninety-five products are registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as bird damage control chemicals, but 38 (40%) are nonlethal chemical repellents (Eschen and Schafer, 1986). Of these products, the active ingredients in 27 (71%) are methiocarb (a physiologic repellent that acts through food avoidance learning) or polybutene (a tactile repellent). In general, chemical repellents are effective either because of aversive sensory effects (irritation), or because of post-ingestional malaise (sickness). If the former, then chemicals are usually stimulants of trigeminal pain receptors (i.e., undifferentiated free nerve endings) in the nose, mouth, and eyes (Mason and Otis, 1990). Although many birds possess adequate olfactory and gustatory capabilities (e.g., Berkhoudt, 1985, Kare and Mason, 1986) smell and taste, per se, are rarely of consequence for bird damage control. Here, we address chemosensory repellents only.

Keywords

Veratryl Alcohol Chemical Sens Vanillyl Alcohol Taxonomic Difference Agelaius Phoeniceus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Acree, T. E., Lavin, E. H., Nishida, R., and Watanabe, S., 1990, The serendipitous discovery of ortho-aminoacetophenone as the ‘foxy’ smelling component of Lambruscana grapes, Chem. Ena. News, 9:80.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, C., 1990, Mitigating impacts to wildlife at FMC Gold Company’s Paradise Peak Mine. in: “Proceedings of the Nevada Wildlife Mining Workshop”, R. McQuivey, ed., Nevada Mining Assoc., Nevada Dept. Minerals and Nevada Dept. Wildl. Reno.Google Scholar
  3. Amerine, M. A., and Singleton, V. L., 1966, “Wine: An introduction for Americans”, Univ. Calif. Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  4. Avery, M. L., Nelson, J. W., and Cone, M. A., 1991, Survey of bird damage to blueberries in North America - 1989, Denver Wildlife Research Center Bird Section Research Report No. 468.Google Scholar
  5. Berkhoudt, H., 1985, Structure and function of avian taste receptors, in: “Form and Function in Birds”, A. S. King, and J. McLelland, eds., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Besser, J. F., 1978, Birds and sunflower. in: “Sunflower Science and Technology”, J. F. Carter, ed., American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison.Google Scholar
  7. Besser, J. F., DeGrazio, J. W., and Guarino, J. L., 1968, Costs of wintering starlings and red-winged blackbirds at feedlots, J. Wildl. Manage. 32:179.Google Scholar
  8. Best, L. B., and Gionfriddo, J. P., 1991, Characterization of grit use by cornfield birds, Wilson Bull. 103: 68.Google Scholar
  9. Bickford, A. A., Ellis, G. H., and Moses, H. E., 1966, Epizootiology of tuberculosis in starlings, J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 149: 312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blokpoel, H., 1976, Bird hazards to aircraft, Canad. Wildl. Serv., Ottawa, Canada, Unpubl. report.Google Scholar
  11. Broadbent, J. M., 1970, “Wine tasting”, Wine and Spirit Publ., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  12. Bullard, R. W., York, J. O., and Kilburn, S. R., 1981, Polyphenolic changes in ripening bird-resistant sorghums, J. Aqr. Food Chem. 29: 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castrale, J. S., 1987, Pesticide use in no-till row-crop fields relative to wildlife, Indiana Acad. Sci., 96: 215.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, L., and Mason, J. R., 1987, Olfactory discrimination of plant volatiles by the European starling, Anim. Behay. 35:227.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, L., Mason, J. R., Shah, P. S., and Dolbeer, R. A., 1991, Bird repellents: Water additive, waste water additive, edible additive, and methods for using same, U. S. Patent Application No. 679–432.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, L., and Shah, P. S., 1991, Nonlethal bird repellents: In search of a general model relating repellency and chemical structure, J. Wildl. Manage. 55:539.Google Scholar
  17. Cobia, D. W., 1978, Production costs and marketing. in: “Sunflower Science and Technology”, J. F. Carter, ed., American Society of Agronomy, Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison.Google Scholar
  18. Craven, S. R., and Lev, E., 1987, Double-crested cormorants in the Apostle Islands, Wisconsin, USA: Population trends, food habits and fishery depredations, Colonial Waterbirds 10: 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crosson, W. F., 1982, Conservation tillage and conventional tillage: a comparative assessment, U. S. Environ. Protec. Agency Report No. 600/3–82–027, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Cummings, J. L., Mason, J. R., Otis, D. L., and Davis, J. E., 1990, Evaluation of methiocarb, zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate, and methyl anthranilate for reducing bird damage to dendrobium orchids. Interim Report to the Hawaiian Farm Bureau, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  21. Dolbeer, R. A., Stickley, A. R., Jr., and Woronecki, P. P., 1978, Starling, Sturnus vulgaris, damage to sprouting wheat in Tennessee and Kentucky, U.S.A., Protec. Ecol., 1: 159.Google Scholar
  22. Dolbeer, R. A., Woronecki, P. P., and Stehn, R. A., 1982, Effects of husk and ear characteristics on resistance of maize to blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) damage in Ohio, USA, Protec. Ecol. 4:127.Google Scholar
  23. Eschen, M. L. and E. W. Schafer, E. W., Jr., 1986, Registered bird damage chemical controls—1985, Denver Wildlife Research Center Bird Damage Research Report No. 356.Google Scholar
  24. Furia, T. E., and Bellanca, N., 1975, “Handbook of Flavor Ingredients”, CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
  25. Glahn, J. F., Mason, J. R., and Woods, D. R., 1989, Effects of dimethyl anthranilate as a bird repellent livestock feed additive, Wildl. Soc. Bull. 17:313.Google Scholar
  26. Green, B. G., Mason, J. R., and Kare, M. R., 1990, “Chemical Senses: Irritation”, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  27. Greig-Smith, P. W., 1987, Hazards to wildlife from pesticide seed treatments. British Crop Protection Council Monograph 39: Application to seeds and soil.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, D. H., 1990, Host odour attractants for Tsetse flies, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V”, D. W. MacDonald“, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynczuk, eds., Oxford University Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Henne, D. R., Pfeifer, W. D., and Besser, J. R., 1979, Bird damage to sunflower in North Dakota in 1978. in: “Proceedings of the Third Sunflower Forum”, D. Lilliboe, ed., National Sunflower Association, Fargo.Google Scholar
  30. Hobbs, J., and Leon, F. G., 1988, Great-tailed grackle predation on south Texas citrus (identifying a unique problem), in: “Proceedings of the Third Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference”, N. R. Holler, ed., Univ. Alabama Press, Gulf Shores.Google Scholar
  31. Hothem, R. L., Mott, D. F., DeHaven, R. W., and Guarino, J. L., 1981, Mesurol as a bird repellent on wine grapes in Oregon and California, Am. J. Enology Viticulture 32: 150.Google Scholar
  32. Kare, M. R., and Mason, J. R., 1986, The chemical senses in birds. In “Avian Physiology”, P. D. Sturkie, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Kef ford, N. P., Leonhardt, K. W., Tanaka, T., and Rohrbach, K. G., 1987, Orchid Industry Analysis. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Report No. 3.Google Scholar
  34. Laycock, G., 1982, The urban goose, Audubon 84: 44.Google Scholar
  35. Mason, J. R., 1989, Avoidance of methiocarb-poisoned apples by red-winged blackbirds. J. Wildl. Manage. 53:836.Google Scholar
  36. Mason, J. R., Adams, M. A., and Clark, L., 1989, Anthranilate repellency to starlings: Chemical correlates and sensory perception, J. Wildl. Manage. 53:55Google Scholar
  37. Mason, J. R., Clark, L. and Shah, P. S., 1991, Ortho-aminoacetophenone repellency to birds: perceptual and chemical similarities to methyl anthranilate, J. Wildl. Manage. 55:334.Google Scholar
  38. Mason, J. R., and Otis, D. L., 1990, Effectiveness of six potential irritants on consumption by red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) and starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in: “Chemical Senses: Irritation”, B. G. Green, J. R. Mason, and M. R. Kare, eds., Marcel Dekker, inc., New York.Google Scholar
  39. Mason, J. R., and Silver, W. L., 1983, Conditioned odor aversions in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) possibly mediated by nasotrigeminal cues, Brain Res., 269: 196.Google Scholar
  40. Mott, D. F., Besser, J. F., West, R. R., and DeGrazio, J. W., 1972, Bird damage to peanuts and methods for alleviating the problem, Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 5:118.Google Scholar
  41. Novotny, M., Jemiolo, B., and S. Harvey, S., 1990, Chemistry of rodent pheromones: molecular insights into chemical signalling in mammals, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V”, D. W. MacDonald, D. Muller-Schwarze, and S. E. Natynczuk, eds., Oxford University Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Ohlendorf, H. M., Hothem, R. L., and Welsh, D., 1989, Nest success, cause-specific nest failure, and hatchability of aquatic birds at selenium-contaminated Kesterson Reservoir and a reference site, Condor 91: 787.Google Scholar
  43. Parkhurst, J. A., and Brooks., R. P., 1988, American kestrels eat trout fingerlings, J. Field Ornithol. 59: 286.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, R. L., and Blom, S., 1988, Distribution and management of eagle/livestock conflicts in the western United States, Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf., 13: 241.Google Scholar
  45. Pilchard, E. I., 1965, Experimental transmission of transmissible gastroenteritis virus by starlings, Am. J. Vet. Res., 26: 1177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Putt, E. D., 1978, History and present world status. in: “Sunflower Science and Technology”, J. F. Carter, ed., American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison.Google Scholar
  47. Schafer, E. W., Jr., Bowles, W. A., Jr., and Hurlbut, J., 1983, The acute oral toxicity, repellency, and hazard potential of 988 chemicals to one or more species of wild and domestic birds, Arch. Environ. Con-tam. Toxicol. 12: 355.Google Scholar
  48. Shah, P. S., Clark, L., and Mason, J. R., 1991, Prediction of avian repellency from chemical structure: The aversiveness of vanillin, vanillyl alcohol, and veratryl alcohol, Pest Biochem. Phvsiol. 40:169.Google Scholar
  49. Stickley, A. R., and Andrews, K. J., 1989, Survey of Mississippi catfish farmers on means, effort, and costs to repel fish-eating birds from ponds, Proc. Eastern Wildl. Damage Cont. Conf., 4:105.Google Scholar
  50. Szolcsanyi, J., Sann, H., and Pierau, F-K., 1986, Nociception in pigeons is not impaired by capsaicin. Pain 27: 247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tobin, M. E., Dolbeer, R. A., and Webster, C. M., 1989, Alternate-row treatment with the repellent methiocarb to protect cherry orchards from birds, Crop Protec. 8: 461.Google Scholar
  52. Tobin, M. E., Dolbeer, R. A., and Woronecki, P. P., 1989, Bird damage to apples in the MidHudson Valley of New York, Hort. Sci., 24: 859.Google Scholar
  53. Twedt, D. J., and Glahn, J. F., 1982, Reducing starling depredations at livestock feeding operations through changes in management practices, Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 10:159.Google Scholar
  54. Wickler, W., 1968, Mimicry in plants and animals. McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, N.Y. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Woronecki, P. P., Stehn, R. A., and Dolbeer, R. A., 1980, Compensatory response of maturing corn kernels following simulated damage by birds, J. Appl. Ecology 17:7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Russell Mason
    • 1
  • Larry Clark
    • 1
  • Pankaj S. Shah
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA/APHIS/S&T/Denver Wildlife Research CenterMonell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Monell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations