Advertisement

Influence of Specific Skin Glands on the Sexual Maturation of Male Golden and Campbell’s Hamsters

  • Vladimir E. Sokolov
  • Nina Yu. Vasilieva
  • Edvard P. Zinkevich

Abstract

Chemical signals play an important role in mammalian communication (Brown, 1979, 1985). Secretions of skin glands have been of particular interest. Glands used for chemical communication are widespread among mammals from different taxonomic groups (Quay, 1977; Adams, 1980). Although several researchers have studied specialized skin glands and associated marking behaviors (Eisenberg and Kleiman, 1972; Johnston, 1973, 1990; Thiessen and Rice, 1976), many questions regarding their function remain. It has been suggested that such glands may contribute to the regulation of population density by influencing reproduction (Naumov, 1973). Apparently this influence can occur through both behavioral (communicative) and physiological mechanisms. The communicative significance of skin glands has been studied intensively, but their physiological effects have not been investigated. The influence of stimuli from specialized skin glands on the rate of sexual maturation has been demonstrated only for primates (Dr. Jane Barrett, personal communication) and the Campbell’s hamster (Sokolov et al., 1989 a,b).

Keywords

Sexual Maturation Gland Secretion Golden Hamster Chemical Communication Scent Gland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M.G., 1980, Odour producing organs of mammals, in: “Olfaction in Mammals”, D.M. Stoddart, ed., Symp. Zool. Soc., London, 45: 57.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R.E., 1979, Mammalian social odors: a crital review, Adv. Study Behay. 10: 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R.E., 1985, The rodents II: Suborder Myomorpha, in: “Social Odors in Mammals 1”, R.E. Brown and D.W. Macdonald, eds., Claredon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Eisenberg, G.F. and Kleiman, D., 1972, Olfactory communication in mammals, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 3: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston, R.E., 1973, Scent marking in mammals, Anim. Behay., 21: 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnston, R.E., 1990, Chemical communication in golden hamsters: from behavior to molecules and neural mechanisms, in: “Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology”, D. Dewsbury, ed., Sinduer, Suderland, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Naumov, N.P., 1973, Biological (signaling) fields and their significance in mammals, Vestnik AN SSSR, 2: 55, in Russian.Google Scholar
  8. Quay, W.B., 1977, Structure and function of skin glands, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates I”, D. Muller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Reasner, D.S., and Johnston, R.E., 1988, Acceleration of reproductive development in female djungarian hamsters by adult males, Physiol. Behay., 43: 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sokolov, V.E., Vasilieva, N. Yu. and Zinkevich, E.P., 1989a, Secretion of Djungarian hamster males’ midventral gland contains the factor influencing maturation, Dokladv Acad. Sci. S.S.S.R., 308: 1274.Google Scholar
  11. Sokolov, V.E., Vasilieva, N. Yu., Voznesenkaya, V.V., Lebedev, V., Teplova, E.N., and Zinkevich, E.P., 1989b, The effect of chemical signals on reproductive state and behavior of females of some rodent species, in: “V Intern. Theriol. Congr. Abstr., Pap. 2”, Roum.Google Scholar
  12. Thiessen, D.D., and Rice, M., 1976, Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior, Psychol. Bull., 83: 505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir E. Sokolov
    • 1
  • Nina Yu. Vasilieva
    • 1
  • Edvard P. Zinkevich
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal Evolutionary Morphology and EcologyAcademy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations