Advertisement

Comparison of Staining Techniques for Detecting Gastric Helicobacters in Tissue Sections

  • K. Serdar Diker
  • N. Karademir
  • J. Erdeger
  • G. Hascelik

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is histologically associated with both acute and chronic gastritis, and can be identified by its characteristic appearance with suitable stains in sections of gastric biopsies. The organism is difficult to see on routine haematoxylin and eosin sections. Silver-based stains have been reported to demonstrate bacteria efficiently and are used commonly in histopathology laboratories1,2. Some workers, however, have claimed that silver impregnation techniques are cumbersome and time consuming and proposed other stains3,6,7,9. “H. heilmannii” (“Gastrospirillum hominis”) are commonly found in the stomach of dogs and cats, and can infect humans5. Since this organism could not be cultured in vitro, it can only be diagnosed by staining smears or sections of gastric specimens. The aim of this study was to compare six histological stains which most readily demonstrate helicobacters on sections which were examined by a pathologist not very familiar with helicobacters.

Keywords

Methylene Blue Chronic Gastritis Staining Technique Gastric Biopsy Antral Biopsy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan W.Y., Hui P.K., Leung K.M., Chow J., Kwok F. and Ng C.S. (1994) Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 102, 503–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Genta R.M., Robason G.O. and Graham D.Y. (1994) Human Pathol., 25, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray S.F., Wyatt J.I. and Rathbone B.J. (1986) J. Clin. Pathol., 39, 1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrickson D.A. (1985) In. Manual of Clinical Microbiology (Eds. E.H. Lennette, et al.), 4th ed., pp.1093–1107, American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee A. and O’Rourke J. (1993) Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am., 22, 21–43.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMullen L., Walker M.M., Bain L.A., Karim Q.N. and Baron J.H. (1987) J. Clin. Pathol., 40, 464–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slater B. (1990) J. Clin. Pathol., 43, 961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steiner G. and Steiner G. (1944) J. Lab. Clin. Med., 29, 868–871.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trowell J.E., Yoong A.K.H., Saul K.J., Gant P.W. and Bell G.D. (1987) J. Clin. Pathol., 40, 702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Serdar Diker
    • 1
  • N. Karademir
    • 1
  • J. Erdeger
    • 1
  • G. Hascelik
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Microbiology and Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineAnkara UniversityTurkey
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyHacettepe School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations