Comparison of the Productivity of a Variety of Selective Media for Campylobacter and Arcobacter Species

  • H. Ibrahim Atabay
  • Janet E. L. Corry
  • David E. Post

Abstract

There have been a number of recent reports that species of Campylobacter, Arcobacter and Helicobacter other than the classical thermophilic Campylobacter spp. cause gastroenteritis in man 4, 7, 8, 9, 14. The medium of Aspinall et al 1 was developed specifically to isolate strains of C. upsaliensis inhibited by the antibiotics used in other media such as modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate medium (m-CCDA) 3,6. An alternative is to use the method of Steele and McDermott 12, which relies on the ability of campylobacters but not competitors to pass through 0.45 or 0.65μm membrane filters and subsequently grow on non-selective medium.

Keywords

Filtration Agar Turbidity Vancomycin Amphotericin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aspinall ST., Wareing D.R.A., Hayward P.G., Hutchinson D.N., (1993) J. Clin. Pathol. 46; 829–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baird R.M., Corry J.E.L., Curtis G.D.W., (1987) International Journal of Food Microbiology, 5; 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolton F.J., Hutchinson D.N. and Parker G. (1988) Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Inf. Dis. 7, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burnens A.P., Stanley J., Morgenstern R. and Nicole J. (1994) Lancet 344, 1569–1570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corry J.E.L., (1982) In: Corry J.E.L. (ed.) Quality assurance and quality control of microbiological culture media. GIT Verlag-Ernst Giebeler; Darmstadt pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corry J.E.L., Post D.E., Colin P. and Laisney M.J. (1995) Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26 43–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edmonds P., Patton C.M., Griffin M.P., et al (1987) J. Clin. Microbiol., 25, 685–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fennel C.L., Rompolo A.M., Totlen P.A., et al. (1986) J. Clin. Microbiol., 24, 146–148.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goossens H., Viaes L., De Boeck M., et al (1990) Lancet 335, 584–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goossens H., Viaes L., Gand I., Borne C. van Den and Butzler J.P., (1989) J. Clin. Microbiol. 27, 1077–1080.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karmali M.A., Simor A.E., Roscoe M., Fleming P.C., Smith S.S. and Lane J., (1986) J. Clin. Microbiol. 23, 456–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steele T.W. and McDermott S.W. (1984) Pathology 16, 263–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tenover F.C. and Fennell C.L. (1992). In: Balows A., Truper H.G., Dworkin M., Hurder W. and Schleifer K.H. (Editors) The Prokaryotes IV, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York, pp. 3488–3511.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Vandamme P., Pugina P., Benzi G., et al (1992) J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 2335–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Ibrahim Atabay
    • 1
  • Janet E. L. Corry
    • 1
  • David E. Post
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Veterinary ScienceUniversity of BristolLangford, AvonUK
  2. 2.Unipath LimitedBasingstoke, HampshireUK

Personalised recommendations