Advertisement

A Method to Screen Trichoderma Isolates Against Soil Sclerotial Fungi and Armillaria Root Rot

  • Pierre Davet
  • Binod Lal
  • Brigitte Lung-Escarmant
  • Jean-Philippe Gallet
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 230)

Abstract

Naturally occurring or mutated strains of soil microorganisms should be assessed for their biocontrol abilities in experimental conditions that closely match those of the natural environment (Whipps and Budge, 1990). Screening for isolates able to control soil fungi should be carried out in natural soils with the target parasite and the antagonist being introduced together. Moreover, the parasite should be tested for aggressiveness (on a test plant) or at least for viability (Lumsden and Lewis, 1989). This method is time and space consuming and impractical when strains are being compared. However, simplified methods can be used when the main mechanisms of antagonist action have been defined. For instance, fungal wall lysis and saprophytic competitiveness have been shown to be important prerequisites for the control of sclerotial soil by Trichoderma (Adams, 1989; Davet, 1987; Elad et al., 1982).

Keywords

Trichoderma Harzianum Colloidal Chitin Glucanase Activity Trichoderma Isolate Space Consuming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, P. B., 1989, Comparison of antagonists of Sclerotinia species, Phytopathology, 79: 1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davet, P., 1979, Technique pour l’analyse des populations de Trichoderma et de Gliocladium virens dans le sol, Ann. Phytopathol., 11: 529.Google Scholar
  3. Davet, P., 1987, Critères de sélection de clones de Trichoderma antagonistes de champignons telluriques à sclèrotes, Bull. OEPP, 17: 535.Google Scholar
  4. Davet, P., and Camporota, P., 1986, Etude comparative de quelques méthodes d’estimation de l’aptitide à la compétition saprophytique dans le sol des Trichoderma, Agronomie, 6: 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elad, Y., Chet, I., and Henis, Y., 1982, Degradation of plant pathogenic fungi by Trichodema harzianum, Can. J. Microbiol., 28: 719.Google Scholar
  6. Lumsden, R. D., and Lewis, J. A., 1989 Selection, production, formulation and commercial use of plant disease biocontrol fungi: problems and progress, pages 171–190, in: “Biotechnology of Fungi for Improving Plant Growth”, J. M. Whipps, and R. D. Lumsden, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Okon, G. A., Chet, I., and Henis, Y., 1973, Effect of lactose, ethanol and cycloheximide on the translocation pattern of radioactive compound and on sclerotium formation in Sclerotium rolfsii, J. Gen. Microbiol., 74: 251.Google Scholar
  8. Reissig, J. L., Strominger, J. L., and Leloir, L. F., 1955, A modified colorimetric method for estimation of N-acetylamine sugars, J. Biol. Chem., 27: 959.Google Scholar
  9. Vial, I., Dubos, B., Durand, A., and Taris, B., 1992, Quality criteria for a biopesticide based on Trichoderma harzianum Rifai (this volume).Google Scholar
  10. Whipps, J. M., and Budge, S. P., 1990, Screening for sclerotial mycoparasites of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Mycol. Res., 94: 607.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Davet
    • 1
  • Binod Lal
    • 2
  • Brigitte Lung-Escarmant
    • 3
  • Jean-Philippe Gallet
    • 3
  1. 1.INRAMontpellier CedexFrance
  2. 2.Ranchi UniversityRanchiIndia
  3. 3.ENITAGradignan CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations