Advertisement

Antihelminthic Activity of the Drug, Oltipraz, on the Surface Ultrastructure of Schistosoma mansoni

  • Randolph Taylor
  • Betty Jones
  • Margaret Major
Part of the Biodeterioration Research book series (BIOR, volume 3)

Abstract

When schistosomes and cestodes are exposed to unfavorable environmental conditions, one of the most important anatomical components that undergoes morphological and degenerative changes is the outer body wall (surface tegument). The primary function of the surface tegument is to mediate the intake of nutrients from the host environment. In addition, it facilitates the secretion of enzymes and regulates the ionic flow of water (Smyth, 1969; Lumsden and Specian, 1980; Threadgold, 1984; Jones et al., 1989; 1988, 1977a and 1977b). Concomitantly, the surface tegument provides a shield for the host and an immunological mechanism, thus allowing resistance to foreign substances (Lumsden et al., 1980). The structure of the surface tegument of schistosomes, particularly Schistosoma mansoni, has been studied utilizing ultrathin sections for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Senft et al., 1961; Silk et al., 1969; Smith et al., 1969; Lumsden and Specian, 1980) and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Miller et al., 1972; Hockley, 1968; Johnson and Moriearty, 1969; Robson and Erasmus, 1970). These investigations have revealed that the surface tegument is a syncytium made up of a surface layer recognized as a cytoplasmic sheath or matrix, connected by cellular extensions to cell bodies (nuclei) buried in the parenchyma.

Keywords

Surface Tegument Ventral Sucker Oral Sucker Schistosoma Mansoni Female Worm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, F. L., Short, J. A. and McCurdy, H. D. (1985). Efficacy of a combined paste formulation of praziquantel/febantel against immature Echinococcus granulosus and immature Echinococcus multilocularis. Am. J. Vet. Res., 46:253–255.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, P. (1981). A summary of the efficacy of praziquantel against schistosomes in animal experiments and notes on its mode of action. Arzneim-Forsch Drug Res., 34:538–539.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, B., Merlhorn, H., Andrews, P., Thomas, H. and Eckert, J. (1980). Light and electron microscopic studies on the effect of praziquantel on Schi stosoma mansoni, Dicrocoelium dendriticum and Faseiola hepatica (trematoda) in vitro. Z. Parasi tenkd., 63:113–128.Google Scholar
  4. Bella, H., Rahim, A., Mustafa, M., Ahmed, M., Wasfi, J. and Bennett J. (1982). Oltipraz antischistosomal efficacy in Sudanese infected with schistosoma mansoni. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 36:775–778.Google Scholar
  5. Bieder J. and Jurneau, H. (1985). Disposition of 14C-oltipraz in animals pharmackinetics in mice, rats and monkeys; comparison of the biotransformation in the infected mouse and in schistosomes. Arzneim-Forsch, 35:1431–1436.Google Scholar
  6. Cerf, P., Mayround, J. and Coluanges, P. (1982). The treatment of Schistosomiasis mansoni with RP35972 (oltipraz). Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Filiates, 75:174.Google Scholar
  7. Hockley, D. J. (1968). Scanning electron microscopy of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. J. Parasi tol., 54:1213–1241.Google Scholar
  8. Horchner, F., Langness, A. and Oguz, T. (1979). Die wirkung von mebendazole and praziquantel auf larval Taenienstadien bei maus, Kaninchen Und Schwein. Tropenmed. Parasi tol., 28:44–50.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. and Moriearty, P. (1969). Examination of Schistosoma cercariae and schistosomules by scanning electron microscopy. Proc. Electron Microscopy Society Am., 27:50–51.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, B.R. and Taylor, R. (1988). Effects of oltipraz on experimental cysticerosis. Proc. SEEM Elect. Micro. Soc. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Jones, B.R. and Taylor, R. (1988). Surface tegumentary membrane alterations in Cysticercus fasciolaris following low doses of the antihelminthic drug, oltipraz. First Ann. F. E. Mapp Sympos, Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  12. Jones, B.R. and Taylor, R. (1989). Surface ultrastructural changes in the tegument of Cysticercus fasciolaris and Schistosoma mansoni following in vitro low doses of the antihelminthic drug, oltipraz. Biodeterioration Research, 2 (Eds. C. E. O’Rear and G. C. Llewellyn), Plenum Press, NY, pp. 661–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, B. R., Smith, B. F. and LeFlore, W. B. (1977a). Scanning electron microscopy of the scolex of Cysticercus fasciolaris. Microbiol. Lett., 4:71–78.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, B. R., Smith, B. F. and LeFlore, W. B. (1977b). Electron scan of the bladder of the cystericus of Hydatigera taeniaformis. Microbiol. Lett., 4:145–150.Google Scholar
  15. Kardaman, M., Fenwick, A., el Igail, A., el Tayeb, M., Bennett, J. and Daffalla, A. (1985). Field trials with oltipraz against Schistosoma mansoni in the Gezira irrigated area, Sudan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 88:95–100.Google Scholar
  16. Lapierre, J., Keita, A., Faurant, C., Heyer, F., Tourte-Schaefer, C., Ancella, T. and Dupouy-Camet, J. (1983). Treatment of 700 cases of bilharziasis with the new drugs oxaminiquine, oltipraz, and praziquantel. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Fi1iates, 76:526–533.Google Scholar
  17. Lumsden, R. and Specian R. (1980). The Morphology, histology and fine structure of the adult stage of the cyclophyllidean tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. In: Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta (ed. H. Arai), Academic Press, NY, pp. 157–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Massoud, A. A., Hafez, A. S., Hussein, M. M., Abdel, K. and Nahaal, A. (1984B). Pharmacokinetic studies on praziquantel and oxaminiquine in intestinal schistosomiasis. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasi tol., 14:599–608.Google Scholar
  19. Massoud, A. A., Kholy, A. M. and Anwar, W. A. (1984a). Assessment of efficacy of praziquantel against Senistosoma mansoni infection. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 87:119–121.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, F. H., Jr., Tulloch, G. S. and Kuntz, R. E. (1972). Scanning electron microscopy of integument surface of Schistosoma mansoni. J. Parasitol., 58(4):693–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rey, J., Sellin, E., Sellin, B., Simonkovich, E. and Mouchet, F. (1984). Comparative efficacy of oltipraz (1 dose, 3 mg/kg) and the combination of niridazole (25 mg/kg) and metrifonate (10 mg/kg) against Schistosoma heamatobium. Med. Trop., 44:155–158.Google Scholar
  22. Robson and Erasmus (1970). The ultrastructure, based on stereoscan observation, of the sucker of the cercaria of Schistosoma mansoni with special reference to penetration. Z. Paraitenkol., 35:76–86.Google Scholar
  23. Senft, A. W., Philpott, D. E. and Pelofsky, A. H. (1961). Electron microscopic observations of the integument, flame cells and gut of Schi stosoma mansoni. J. Parasitol., 47:217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw, M. and Erasmus, D. (1983). Schi stosoma mansoni: Dose-related tegumental surface changes after in vivo treatment with praziquantel. Z. Parasitenkol., 69:643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silk, M. H. and Spence, I. M. (1969a). Ultrastructural studies of the blood fluke-Schi stosoma mansoni. 11. The masculature. S. At r. J. Med. Sci., 34:11–20.Google Scholar
  26. Silk, M. H., Spence, I. M. and Buch, B. (1970). Observations of Schistosoma mansoni blood flukes in the scanning electron microscope. S. Afr. J. of Med. Sci., 35(1): 23–29.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, J. H., Reynolds, E. S., and von Lichtengerg F. (1969). The integument of Schi stosoma mansoni. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 18:28–49.Google Scholar
  28. Smyth, J. (1969). The Physiology of Cestodes. (San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company).Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, H. and Gennert, R. (1978). The efficacy of praziquantel against cestodes in animals. Z. Parasitenkol., 52:117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas, H., Andrews, P. and Mehlhorn, H. (1982). New results on the effect of paraziquantel in experimental cysticercosis, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 31:803–810.Google Scholar
  31. Thomas, H., Gennert, R. and Seubert, J. (1985). Investigations about treatment of larval tissue stages with a new compound. J. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. World. Association Parasitol., p. 49.Google Scholar
  32. Threadgold, L. T. (1984). Parasitic plateyhelminthes. in: Biology of the Integument. I. Invertebrates. Ed. by Bereiter-Hahn, J. Matolsky, A. G. and Richards, K. S., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 132–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verheyen, A., Vanparijs, O., Borgers, M. and Thienpont, D. (1978). Scanning electron microscopic observations of Cysticercus Google Scholar
  34. Verheyen, A., Vanparijs, O., Borgers, M. and Thienpont, D. (1978). Scanning electron microscopic observations of Cysticercus fasciolaris (Taenia teaniaeformis) after treatment of mice with mebendazole. J. Parasitol., 64:411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiao, S. H., Friedman, P. A., Catto, B. A. and Webster, L. T. (1984). Praziquantel-induced vesicle formation in the tegument of male Schistosoma mansoni is calcium dependent. J. Parasitol., 70:177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph Taylor
    • 1
  • Betty Jones
    • 1
  • Margaret Major
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology Parasitology and Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Scanning Electron Microscopy Research Laboratory, Research and Resource Center for Electron MicroscopyMorris Brown College and Atlanta University CenterAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations