A Case Study of the Compatibility of Biocidal Cleaning and Consolidation in the Restoration of a Marble Statue
The two major components of the restoration of an 1884 outdoor marble sculpture in New Orleans were cleaning the extensive biological growth and consolidating the fragile surface. New Orleans’ semi-tropical climate encourages the growth of microorganisms that can be damaging to the stone. The biological growth on the sculpture of Margaret Haughery, a philanthropist (Figures la and lb), was found to include algae, fungi, hemi-lichens and lichens, particularly Caloplaca feracissima H. Magn., which greatly altered the white Carrara marble surface appearance. In addition, some organisms had penetrated up to 10 mm into the stone along larger cracks (Figure 2) and 0.05 mm beneath loose surface crystals. Their physical presence contributed to the mechanical degradation of the marble. They also contributed to the stone’s chemical degradation by etching the marble crystals with acidic secretions (Figure 3).
KeywordsClay Ethyl Silicate Iodine Sodium Chloride
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ashurst, J. and Ashurst, N. (1988). Practical Building Conservation: Stone Masonry. Vol. 1, pp. 20–26. Halstead Press, A division of John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
- Barov, Z. (1987). An Effective Cleaner for Organic Stains of Stone, In: ICOM Committee for Conservation, Preprints of the 8th Triennial Meeting. Sydney. Australia 6–11 September. 1987. pp. 465-468. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- Building Research Establishment Digest (1982). Control of Lichens, Moulds and Similar Growths. Building Research Advisory Service, Garston, Watford, England.Google Scholar
- Fry, M.F. (1985). The Problems of Ornamental Stonework-Lichen. Stone Industries. March 1985, 22-25.Google Scholar
- Grant, C. and Bravery, A.F. (1985). A New Method For Assessing Resistance of Stone to Algal Disfigurement and the Efficacy of Chemical Inhibitors, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. 25–27 September, 1985, Lausanne, pp. 663-674. Presses Polytechnique Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Grimmer, A.E. (1988). Keeping It Clean: Removing Exterior Dirt. Paint. Stains and Graffiti from Historic Masonry Buildings. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Preservation Assistance Division, Technical Preservation Services, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Hale, M.E. Jr. (1978). Control of biological growths on Mayan archaeological ruins in Guatemala and Honduras, report on a National Geographic Research Project.Google Scholar
- Koestler, R.J., and Santoro, E.D. (1988). Assessment of the Susceptibility to Biodeterioration of Selected Polymers and Resins, Special Publication of The J. Paul Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- Richardson, B.A. (1975). Control of Moss, Lichen and Algae on Stone, In: Conservation of Stone I, Proceedings of the International Symposium. 19–21 June, 1975, Bologna, pp. 225-231 (Rossi-Manaresi, ed.), Centro per la Conservazione delle Sculture All’Aperto, Bologna.Google Scholar
- Riederer, J. (1981). The Preservation of Historical Monuments in Sri Lanka, In: The Conservation of Stone II, Preprints of the Contributions to the International Symposium. 27–30 October, 1981, Bologna, pp. 737-757 (Rossi-Manaresi, ed.), Centro per la Conservazione delle Sculture All–Aperto, Bologna.Google Scholar
- Riederer, J. (1986). Protection from Weathering of Building Stone in Tropical Countries, In: Case Studies in the Conservation of Stone and Wall Paintings. Preprints of the Contributions to the Bologna Congress, 21–26 September, 1986, Bologria, pp. 151-154 (Brommelle and Smith, eds.), The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London.Google Scholar