Advertisement

Issues in the Use of Aversives

Factors Associated with Behavior Modification for Autistic and Other Developmentally Disabled People
  • Johnny L. Matson
  • Jay A. Sevin
Part of the Current Issues in Autism book series (CIAM)

Abstract

Nationally, professionals in the field of autism have been rocked by the controversy surrounding the use of punishment procedures also called aversives (Singh & Repp, 1993). The techniques in question have generally been discussed in the context of behavior modification strategies or learning-based technology, and psychologists and educators have been the primary groups involved. Behavior modification has had widespread application in the treatment of persons with autism (Van Houten, 1990). However, since the late 1980s the rhetoric surrounding these procedures has intensified. National agencies and policymakers have become involved in the debate over which procedures should and should not be considered acceptable to treat severe behavior problems of handicapped people (AAMD, 1987; Blake, 1988; Keyes, Creekmore, Karst, Crow, & Dayan, 1988; Matson, 1988). Given the broad implications of such a debate, the impact on the field has been considerable. A brief review of some of the major issues, including confusion over definition, conflict between advocates and professionals, concepts as ideologies, data versus testimonials, age appropriateness as ideology, freedom of treatment choice, and professional control versus treatment by bureaucratic rule will be the primary focus of this chapter. Some likely outcomes and future directions of the aversives controversy will also be discussed.

Keywords

Developmental Disability Corporal Punishment Advocacy Group Disable Person Apply Behavior Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAMD position statement on aversive therapy. (1987). Mental Retardation, 25, 118.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, D. B. (1990). On the limits of further empirical evidence for deciding the debate over aversive techniques. The Behavior Therapist, 13, 147–148.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, D. B., & Silverstein, J. M. (1990). Quantifying treatment aversiveness: An empirical approach. Paper to be presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  4. Azrin, N. H., Belasel, V. A., & Wisotek, I. E. (1982). Treatment of self-injury by a reinforcement plus interruption procedure. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, B. A. (1986). Anger management training. Psychiatric Aspects of Mental Retardation Reviews, 5, 51–55.Google Scholar
  6. Benson, B. A., Rice, C. J., & Miranti, S. V. (1986). Effects of anger management training with mentally retarded adults in group treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 728–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake, A. (1988). Aversives: Are they needed? Are they ethical? Autism Research Review, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G. S., & Shaw, M. (1986). Social skills training in education. In C. Hollin & P. Trower (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training (Vol. 1, pp. 59–78). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Thibodeau, M. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 155–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coe, D. A. & Matson, J. L. (1993). On the empirical basis for using aversive and nonaversive therapy. In N. N. Singh and A. C. Repp (Eds.), Severe behavior problems in developmental disabilities: Issues in non-aversive therapy.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, C. L., Gardner, W. I., & Karan, O. C. (1986). Self-management training of mentally retarded adults presenting severe conduct difficulties. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnellan, A. M., La Vigna, G. W., Negri-Shoultz, N., & Fassbender, L. L. (1988). Progress without punishment. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Emerson, E. B. (1985). Evaluating the impact of deinstitutionalization on the lives of mentally retarded people. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 277–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Favell, J., McGimsey, J., & Jones, M. (1978). The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 225–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foxx, R., McMorrow, M., & Mennemeir, M. (1984). Teaching social/vocational skills to retarded adults with a modified table game. An analysis of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 343–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, W. I., & Cole, C. L. (1988). Conduct disorders: Psychological therapies. In J. L. Matson (ed.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded (2nd ed., pp. 225-248).Google Scholar
  17. Gresham, F. M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 422–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guess, D., Helmstetter, E., Turnbull, H. R., III, & Knowlton, S. (1986). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis (Monograph). Seattle: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.Google Scholar
  19. Guess, D., Turnbull, H. R., III, & Helmstetter, E. (1990). Science, paradigms, and values: A response to Mulick. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 157–163.Google Scholar
  20. Heffer, R. W., & Kelley, M. L. (1987). Mothers’ acceptance of behavioral interventions for children: The influence of parent race and income. Behavior Therapy, 2, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jordan, J., Singh, N. N., & Repp, A. C. (1989). An evaluation of gentle teaching and visual screening in the reduction of stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 9–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley, M. L., Grace, N., & Elliot, S. N. (1990). Acceptability of positive and punitive discipline methods: Comparisons among abusive, potentially abusive, and nonabusive parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keyes, J. R., Creekmore, W. N., Karst, R., Crow, R., & Dayan, M. (1988). AAMR position statement on aversive therapy: The controversy. Mental Retardation, 26, 314–318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1990). Extended reductions in Stereotypic behavior of students with autism through a self-management treatment package. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Konarski, E. A., Jr. (1990). Science as an ineffective White Knight. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 169–171.Google Scholar
  26. LaVigna, G. W. & Donnellan, A. M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  27. Linscheid, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Ricketts, R. W., Williams, D. E., & Griffin, J. C. (1990). Clinical evaluation of the Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System (SIBIS). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 53–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchetti, A. G., & Campbell, V. A. (1990). Social skills. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded (2nd ed., pp. 333–350). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  29. Matson, J. L. (1988). IARET Newsletter, 1, 1.Google Scholar
  30. Matson, J. L. (Ed.). (1990). Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded. (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  31. Matson, J. L., DiLorenzo, T. M. (1984). Punishment and its alternatives. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  32. Matson, J. L., & Keyes, J. B. (1990). A comparison of DRO to movement suppression time-out and DRO with two self-injurious and aggressive mentally retarded adults. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 111–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matson, J. L., Marchetti, A., & Adkins, J. A. (1980). Comparison of operant and independence training procedures for mentally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 487–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matson, J. L., & Taras, M. E. (1989). A 20 Year review of punishment and alternative methods to treat problem behaviors in developmentally disabled persons. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 85–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., Mason, D., & McClannahan, L. E. (1983). A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mulick, J. A. (1990). The ideology and science of punishment in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 142–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  38. Senatore, V., Matson, J. L., & Kazdin, A. E. (1982). A comparison of behavioral methods to train social skills to mentally retarded adults. Behavior Therapy, 13, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh, N. N., & Repp, A. C. (1993). Severe behavior problems in developmental disabilities: Issues in non-aversive therapy.Google Scholar
  40. Slifer, K. J., Iwata, B. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1984). Reduction of eye gouging using a response interruption procedure. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 15, 369–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Houten, R. (1990). Emotional problems II: Autism. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded. (2nd ed., pp. 421–437). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 381–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wildman, B. G., Wildman, H. E., & Kelly, W. J. (1986). Group conversational-skill training and social validation with mentally retarded adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 443–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johnny L. Matson
    • 1
  • Jay A. Sevin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations