Genetic Influences on Body Mass Index in Early Childhood

  • Lon R. Cardon
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


It has become increasingly clear that hereditary factors play an important role in human fatness. Studies of adoptive families and twins reared together and apart have indicated a strong familial component to body fat that appears to be largely genetic in origin (Stunkard, Foch, & Hrubec, 1986; Stunkard, Harris, Pedersen, & McClearn, 1990; Price, Cadoret, & Stunkard, 1987; Price & Gottesman, 1991). Although such studies have typically focused on genetic contributions to fatness in adults, some evidence for a genetic etiology of body fat has also been obtained in studies of children (Brook, Huntley, & Slack, 1975; Price et al., 1990b).


Genetic Influence Adoptive Parent Behavior Genetic Adoptive Family Childhood Body Mass Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brook, C., Huntley, R., and Slack, J. (1975). Influence of heredity and environment in determination of skinfold thickness in children. British Medical Journal, 2, 719–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cardon, L. R. (1994). Height, weight, and obesity. In J. C. DeFries, R. Plomin, and D. W. Fulker (Eds), Nature and nurture during middle childhood. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, G. (1986). A general multivariate approach to linear modeling in human genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics, 39, 775–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 37, 205–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eaves, L. J., Long, J., and Heath, A. C. (1986). A theory of developmental change in quantitative phenotypes applied to cognitive development. Behavior Genetics, 16, 143–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fulker, D. W. (1991). Paper presented at the 17th conference of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Fulker, D. W., DeFries, J. C., and Plomin, R. (1988). Genetic influence on general mental ability increases between infancy and middle childhood. Nature, 336, 767–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., Neale, M. C., and Meyer, J. M. (1988). Resolving causes of developmental continuity or “tracking.” I. Longitudinal twin studies during growth. Behavior Genetics, 18, 122–151.Google Scholar
  10. Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Phillips, K., and Fulker, D. W. (1989). Quantitative genetic analysis of longitudinal trends in adoption designs with application to IQ in the Colorado Adoption Project. Behavior Genetics, 19, 621–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Plomin, R. (1986). Multivariate analysis and developmental behavioral genetics: Developmental change as well as continuity. Behavior Genetics, 16, 25–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Plomin, R., and DeFries, J. C. (1985). Origins of individual differences in infancy: The Colorado Adoption Project. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1988). Nature and nurture during infancy and early childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Price, R. A., Cadoret, R. J., and Stunkard, A. J. (1987). Genetic contributions to human fatness: An adoption study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1003–1008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Price, R. A., and Gottesman, I. I. (1991). Body fat in identical twins reared apart: Roles for genes and environment. Behavior Genetics, 21, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Price, R. A., Ness, R., and Laskarzewski, P. (1990a). Common major gene inheritance of extreme overweight. Human Biology, 14, 747–765.Google Scholar
  18. Price, R. A., Stunkard, A. J., Ness, R., Wadden, T., Heshka, S., Kanders, B., and Cormillot, A. (1990b). Childhood onset obesity has high familial risk. International Journal of Obesity, 14, 185–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rolland-Cachera, M. F., Deheeger, M., Bellisle, F., Semp’e, M., Guilloud-Bataille, M., and Patois, E. (1984). Adiposity rebound in children: A simple indicator for predicting obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 39, 129–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rolland-Cachera, M. F., Deheeger, M., Guilloud-Bataille, M., Avons, P., Patois, E., and Semp’e, M. (1987). Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood. Annals of Human Biology, 14, 219–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stunkard, A. J., Foch, T. T., and Hrubec, Z. (1986). A twin study of human obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 256, 51–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stunkard, A. J., Harris, J. R., Pedersen, N. L., and McCleam, G. E. (1990). The body-mass index of twins who have been reared apart. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 1483–1487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanner, J. M. (1949). Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2, 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lon R. Cardon
    • 1
  1. 1.Sequana TherapeuticsLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations