Abstract
For many phenotypes of interest in behavioral medicine, there are differences between men and women. Preceding chapters discuss (1) alcoholism, the prevalence of which is markedly higher in men than in women; (2) smoking, which has historically occurred more often and at younger ages in men, though in recent years the prevalence has increased more rapidly among women; (3) cardiovascular indices, for which women tend to have higher resting heart rates and lower blood pressures; (4) body size, regarding which women are on average both shorter and lighter than men; and (5) eating disorders, which show dramatically higher prevalence in women than in men. Gender differences in these areas have generally been described in behavioral research in terms of average phenotypic differences (e.g., different prevalence rates). For some conditions, such as hemophilia or color blindness, higher prevalence rates in men than in women are a consequence of the fact that the gene that causes the condition is located on the X chromosome and there is a particular (recessive) form of gene action. However, most of the traits in which we are interested are not X-linked in this way, but are influenced by genes on the 22 pairs of (non-sex-determining) autosomes. In these cases, average gender differences are not immediately informative about gene action. But such average differences should at least alert us to the possibility that individual differences among men and among women might result from autosomal genes that have greater impact in women than in men (or vice versa), or that some genes that might contribute to vulnerability in women are distinct from those genes that might contribute to vulnerability in men.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cloninger, R., Christiansen, K. O., Reich, T., Gottesman, I. I. (1978). Implication of sex differences in prevalences of antisocial personality, alcholism and criminality for familial transmission. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 941–951.
DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D, W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–473.
DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 37, 205–216.
Dolan, C. V., Molenaar, P. C. M., and Boomsma, D. I. (1992). Decomposition of multivariate phenotypic means in multigroup genetic covariance structure analysis. Behavior Genetics, 22, 319–335.
Heath, A. C., Cates, R., Martin, N. G., Meyer, J., Hewitt, J. K., Neale, M. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1993). Genetic contribution to risk of smoking across birth cohorts and across cultures. Journal of Substance Abuse, 5, 221–246.
Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989). Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL. Behavior Genetics, 19, 9–36.
Heath, A. C., Slutske, W. S., and Madden, P. A. F. (in press). Gender differences in the genetic contribution to alcoholism risk and drinking patterns. In R. W. Wilsnack and S. C. Wilsnack (Eds.), Gender and alcohol. Rutgers, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Hewitt, J. K. (1990). Changes in genetic control during learning, development, and aging. In M. E. Hahn, J. K. Hewitt, N. D. Henderson, and R. Benno (Eds.), Developmental behavior genetics: Neural, biometrical, and evolutionary approaches (pp. 217–235 ). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hewitt, J. K., Stunkard, A. J., Carroll, D., Sims, J., and Tumer, J. R. (1991). A twin study approach towards understanding genetic contributions to body size and metabolic rate. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 40, 133–146.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications, 2nd ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Neale, M. C. (1993). Mx: Statistical modeling ( 2nd Ed. ). Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Walters, E. E., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., Meyer, J. M., Silberg, J., Neale, M. C., Martin, N. G., and Kendler, K. S. (1994). A model system for analysis of family resemblance in extended kinships of twins. Behavior Genetics, 24 (1), 35–49.
Turkheimer, E. (1991). Individual and group differences in adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 392–405.
Winchester, A. M. (1975). Human genetics. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynolds, C.A., Hewitt, J.K. (1995). Issues in the Behavior Genetic Investigation of Gender Differences. In: Turner, J.R., Cardon, L.R., Hewitt, J.K. (eds) Behavior Genetic Approaches in Behavioral Medicine. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9377-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9377-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9379-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9377-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive