Advertisement

Optical Coherence and Counting Statistics

  • John N. Dodd
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PIDF)

Abstract

The coherence of a light field can be domonstrated by the phenomenon of interference. In the classical experiment of Thomas Young in 1801 the coherence was induced by arranging that the light diffracted by a fine slit should illuminate two parallel slits which then acted as two coherent sources. In the more modern version of the experiment a laser beam illuminates the two slits; the transverse coherence across the laser beam creates two coherent sources. The temporal coherence between the two sources can be displayed by superimposing the field E(t) from one slit with the field from the other at a different time E(t + τ). This is achieved by observing the intensity at points that are at different distances, s 1 and s2, from the two slits so that one is superimposing the light fields from two different times t 2t 1 = τ = (s 1s 2)/c; see Fig. 18. The field at the observation point P at time t′ originates from the slit s 1 at time t 1 = t′ − s 1/c = t; and originates from the slit s 2 at a later time t 2 = t′ − s 2/ c = t + τ.

Keywords

Light Field Coherence Function Coherence Time Coherent Light Classical Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 2nd Ed. ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Hanbury and R. Q. Twiss, “A New Type of Interferometer for Use in Radio Astronomy,” Phil. Mag. 45 (7), 663–682 (1954).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. T. Arecci, E. Gatti, and A. Sona, “The Time Distribution of Photons from Coherent and Gaussian Sources,” Phys. Lett. 20, 27–29 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Diedrich and H. Walther, “Nonclassical Radiation of a Single Stored Ion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 203–206 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. J. Carmichael and D. F. Walls, “A Quantum Mechanical Master Equation Treatment of the Dynamical Stark Effect,” J. Phys. B., Atom. Mol. Phys. 9, 1190–1219 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Dagenais and L. Mandel, “Investigation of Two-Time Correlations in Photon Emissions from a Single Atom,” Phys. Rev. A 18, 2217–2228 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John N. Dodd
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OtagoOtagoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations