Advertisement

Interconnections amongst Anamorphs and their Possible Contribution to Ascomycete Systematics

  • B. C. Sutton
  • G. L. Hennebert
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 269)

Summary

Previous attempts at syntheses between ascomycete classifications and systems proposed for deuteromycetes (mainly based on conidiogenesis) are reviewed. Problems surrounding previous and current attempts at correlative work are emphasized. The relationships between non-lichenized ascomycetes and the latest concepts and terminology on conidiogenesis in anamorphs are reassessed. The anamorph-teleomorph connections in the Sclerotiniaceae, Pezizaceae and Mycosphaerella are treated in more detail.

Keywords

Conidiogenous Cell Conidial Fungus British Mycological Society Mitosporic Fungus Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aa, H.A., van der, 1973, Studies in Phyllosticta I, Studies in Mycology, Baarn 5: 1–110.Google Scholar
  2. von Arx, J.A., 1983, Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs, Proceedings Koniklije Nederlandse akademie van wetenschappen, ser. C, 86: 15–54.Google Scholar
  3. von Arx, J. A., 1984, Notes on Monographella and Microdochium, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 82: 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr, M.E., 1972, Preliminary studies on the Dothideales in temperate North America, Contributions to the University of Michigan Herbarium 9: 523–638.Google Scholar
  5. Berthet, P., 1964, Formes conidiennes de divers Discomycètes, Bulletin de la Société mycologique de France 80: 125–149.Google Scholar
  6. Buchwald, N.F., 1949, Studies in the Sclerotiniaceae. I. Taxonomy of the Sclerotiniaceae, Kongelige Veterinaer-og Landbohoiokoles Aursskrifl 1949: 75–191.Google Scholar
  7. Buchwald, N.F., 1970, Septotis g. nov. and Ovulitis g. nov. two new form-genera of Sclerotiniaceae, Friesia 9: 326–329.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, G.T., and R.A. Samson, 1979, Patterns of Development in Conidial Fungi, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  9. Constantin, J., 1888, Les Mucédinées Simples, Paul Klincksieck, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Constantinescu, O., 1984, Taxonomic revision of Septoria-like fungi parasitic on Betulaceae, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 83: 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David, J.C., 1993, Heterosporium and its relationship to Cladosporium. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  12. de Bary, A., 1863, Recherches sur le développement de quelques champignons parasites, Annales des sciences naturelles, Botanique, sér. IV, 20: 5–148.Google Scholar
  13. de Bary, A., 1864, Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Abhandlungen Senckenbergischen naturforsalenden Gessellschafl 5: 137.Google Scholar
  14. de Bary, A., 1869, Ueber Schimmel und Hefe, In: Sammlung gemeinverständlicher wissenschaftlicher Wortrage (R. Virchow and F. von Holzendorf, eds): IV, 87–88: 551–630.Google Scholar
  15. de Bary, A., 1884, Wergleichende Morphologie und Biologie der Pilze, Mycetozoen und Bactérien, W. Engelmann, Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Hoog, G.S., 1979, Deductive classification — worked examples using anamorph and teleomorph data in the ascomycetes, In: The Whole Fungus (W.B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 215–239. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  17. Deighton, F.C., 1973, Studies on Cercospora and allied genera. IV. Cercosporella Sacc, Pseudocer-cosporella gen. nov. and Pseudocercosporidium gen. nov., Mycological Papers 133: 1–62.Google Scholar
  18. Deighton, F.C., 1979, Studies on Cercospora and allied genera. VII. New species and redispositions, Mycological Papers 144: 1–56.Google Scholar
  19. Deighton, F.C., 1983, Studies on Cercospora and allied genera. VIII. Further notes on Cercoseptoria and some new species and redispositions, Mycological Papers 151: 1–13.Google Scholar
  20. Deighton, F.C., 1987, New species of Pseudocercospora and Mycovellosiella, and new combinations into Pseudocercospora and Phaeoramularia, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 88: 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson, O.E. and D.L. Hawksworth, 1993, Outline of the ascomycetes — 1993, Systerna Ascornycetum 12: 51–257.Google Scholar
  22. Farr, D.F., 1991, Septoria species on Cornus, Mycologia 83: 611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fresenius, J.B.G.W., 1850, Beiträge zur Mykologie, Heinrich Ludwig Bönner, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  24. Fuckel, L., 1870, Symbolae Mycologicae. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Rheinischen Pilze, Jahrbuch Nassaurschen Vereins Naturkunde 23–24: 1–459.Google Scholar
  25. Fuckel, L., 1873, Symbolae Mycologicae. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Rheinischen Pilze Zoreiter Nächtrag, Jahrbuch Nassaurschen Wereins Naturkunde 27–28: 1–99.Google Scholar
  26. Gregory, P.H., (1949), Studies on Sclerotinia and Botrytis. II. De Bary’s description and specimens of Peziza fuckeliana, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 32: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harada, Y., and S.-I. Noro, 1988, Grovesinia pruni sp. nov., the teleomorph of a new zonate leaf spot fungus on Prunus in Japan, Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 29: 85–92.Google Scholar
  28. Hawksworth, D.L., 1985, Kirschsteiniothelia, a new genus for the Microthelia incrustans-group (Dothideales), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawksworth, D.L., B.C. Sutton, and G.C. Ainsworth, 1983, Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 7th edn. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
  30. Hennebert, G.L., 1973, Botrytis and Botrytis-like genera, Persoonia 7: 183–204.Google Scholar
  31. Hennebert, G.L., and A. Bellemere, 1979, Les formes conidiennes des Discomycètes. Essai taxonomique, Revue des Mycologie 43: 259–315.Google Scholar
  32. Hennebert, G.L., and R.P. Korf, 1975, The peat mould, Chromelosporium ollare, conidial state of Peziza ostracoderma, and its misapplied names, Botrytis crystallina, Botrytis spectabilis, Ostracoderma epigaeum and Peziza atrovinosa, Mycologia 67: 214–240.Google Scholar
  33. Höhnel, F., von, 1916, Fragmente zur Mykologie 997. Über Illosporium Diedickeanum Saccardo, Sitzungsberichte Akademie Wissenschaften Wien, Abt. 1, 125: 96–98.Google Scholar
  34. Höhnel, F., von, 1923, System der Fungi Imperfecti Fuckel, Mycologisches Untersuchungen 1: 301–369.Google Scholar
  35. Honey, E.E., 1928, The monilioid species of Sclerotinia, Mycologia 20: 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, S.J., 1949, Studies on some diseases on sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) II. The life history of Ramularia onobrychidis Allescher, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 32: 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, S.J., 1953, Conidiophores, conidia, and classification, Canadian Journal of Botany 31: 577–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hughes, S.J., 1958, Revisiones hyphomycetum aliquot cum appendice de nominibus rejiciendis, Canadian Journal of Botany 36: 727–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes, S.J., 1976, Sooty moulds, Mycologia 68: 693–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Juel, H.O., 1920, Über Hyphelia und Ostracoderma, zwei von Fries aufgestellte Pilzgattungen, Svensk botanisk tidskrift 14: 212–222.Google Scholar
  41. Kendrick, W.B. (ed.), 1971, Taxonomy of Fungi Imperfecti, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  42. Kendrick, W.B. (ed.), 1979, The Whole Fungus. 2 vols. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  43. Kendrick, W.B., 1981, The systematics of hyphomycetes, In: Biology of Conidial Fungi (G.T. Cole and W.B. Kendrick, eds) 1: 21–42. Academic Press, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kendrick, W.B., and F. DiCosmo, 1979, Teleomorph-anamorph connections in ascomycetes, In: The Whole Fungus (W.B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 283–410. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  45. Klebahn, H., 1918, Haupt-und Nebenfruchtformen der Askomyzeten, Gebrüder Borntrager, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  46. Korf, R.P., 1972, Synoptic key to the genera of Pezizales, Mycologia 64: 937–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Korf, R.P., 1973, Discomycetes and Tuberales, In: The Fungi (G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman eds) IVA: 249–319. Academic Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Laibach, F., 1922, Untersuchungen uber einige Ramularia- und Ovularia-Arten und ihre Beziehungen zur Askomyzetengattung Mycosphaerella, Zentralblatt Bakteriologie, Parasitnekunde, Infektionskrankheiten Hygiene 55: 284–293.Google Scholar
  49. Link, H.F., 1809, Observationes in Ordines Plantarum naturales. Dissertatio I, Magazin Besellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 3: 3–42.Google Scholar
  50. Luttrell, E.S., 1979, Deuteromycetes and their relationships, In: The Whole Fungus (W.B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 241–264. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  51. Mason, E.W., 1937, Annotated aacount of fungi received at the Imperial Mycological Institute, List II (Fasc. 3 — General Part), Mycological Papers 4: 68–99.Google Scholar
  52. Micheli, P.A., 1729, Nova Plantarum Genera, Bernard Paperini, Florence.Google Scholar
  53. Minter, D.W., P.M. Kirk, and B.C. Sutton, 1982, Holoblastic phialides, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 79: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Minter, D.W., P.M. Kirk, and B.C. Sutton, 1983a, Thallic phialides, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 80: 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Minter, D.W., Sutton, B.C. and Brady, B.L., 1983b, What are phialides anyway?, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 81: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Molliard, M., 1904, Forme conidienne et sclérotes de Morchella esculenta Pers., Revue générale des botanique 16: 209–218.Google Scholar
  57. Müller, E., 1971, Imperfect-perfect connections in ascomycetes, In: Taxonomy of Fungi Imperfecti (W.B. Kendrick, ed.): 184–201. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  58. Nag Raj, T.R., 1981, Coelomycete systematics, In: The Biology of Conidial Fungi (G.T. Cole and W.B. Kendrick, eds) 1: 43–84. Academic Press, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nées, C.G.D., 1817, Das System der Pilze und Schwämme, Stacheischen Buchhandlung, Würzburg.Google Scholar
  60. Niedbalski, M., J.L. Crane, and D. Neely, 1979, Illinois fungi 10. Development, morphology and taxonomy of Cristulariella pyramidalis, Mycologia 71: 722–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paden, J.W., 1972, Imperfect states and the taxonomy of the Pezizales, Persoonia 6: 405–414.Google Scholar
  62. Persoon, C.H., 1801, Synopsis Methodica Fungorum, Gottingen.Google Scholar
  63. Reynolds, D.R., and J.W. Taylor (eds), 1993, The Fungal Holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  64. Rimpau, R.H., 1961, Untersuchungen über die Gattung Drepanopeziza (Kleb.) v.Höhn., Phytopathologische Zeitschrifie 43: 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saccardo, P.A., 1884, Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 3. Padova.Google Scholar
  66. Saccardo, P.A., 1886, Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 6. Padova.Google Scholar
  67. Stalpers, J. A., 1974, Revision of the genus Oedocephalum (Fungi Imperfecti), Proceedings Koniklije Nederlandse akademie van wetenschappen, C, 77: 402–407.Google Scholar
  68. Subramanian, C.V., 1971, Hyphomycetes. An account of Indian species, except Cercosporae, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  69. Subramanian, C.V., 1983, The Hyphomycetes. Taxonomy and biology, Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  70. Sutton, B.C., 1973, Coelomycetes, In: The Fungi (G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman, eds) IVA: 513–582. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  71. Sutton, B.C., 1980, The Coelomycetes, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
  72. Sutton, B.C., 1993, Mitosporic Fungi (deuteromycetes) in the Dictionary of the Fungi, In: The Fungal Holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 27–55. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  73. Sutton, B.C., and I.G. Pascoe, 1987, Septoria spoecies on Acacia, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 89: 521–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutton, B.C., and I.G. Pascoe, 1988, Pseudocercospora correicola sp. nov., another leaf pathogen of Correa species from Australia, Australian Systematic Botany 1: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sutton, B.C., and I.G. Pascoe, 1989, Some Septoria species on native Australian plants, Studies in Mycology, Baarn 31: 177–186.Google Scholar
  76. Sutton, B.C., I.G. Pascoe, and I.K. Sharma, 1987, Pseudocercospora correae sp. nov., a leaf pathogen of Correa species from Australia, Australian Journal of Botany 35: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sutton, B.C., and F.G. Pollack, 1974, Microfungi on Cercocarpus, Mycopathologia et Mycologia applicata 52: 331–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sutton, B.C., and J.M. Waller, 1988, Taxonomy of Ophiocladium hordei, causing leaf leasions on Triticale and other Gramineae, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 90: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sutton, B.C., and J. Webster, 1984, Septogloeum japonicum and Marssonina pakistanica spp. nov., coelomycetes with Tricellula-like conidia, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 83: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tubaki, K., 1958, Studies on the Japanese hyphomycetes V. Leaf and stem group with a discussion of the classification of hyphomycetes and their perfect states, Journal of the Hattori Botany Laboratory 20: 142–244.Google Scholar
  81. Tubaki, K., 1981, Hyphomycetes-their perfect-imperfect connexions, J. Cramer, Vaduz.Google Scholar
  82. Tulasne, L.R., and C. Tulasne, 1861–1865, Selecta Carpologia Fungorum, 3 vols. Imperial Press, Paris.Google Scholar
  83. Vobis, G., 1980, Bau und Entwicklung der Flechten-Pyknidien und ihrer conidien, Bibliotheca Lichenologica 14: 1–141.Google Scholar
  84. Vobis, G., and D.L. Hawksworth, 1981, Conidial lichen-forming fungi, In: Biology of Conidial Fungi (G.T. Cole and W.B. Kendrick, eds) 1: 245–273. Academic Press, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vuillemin, P., 1910a, Matériaux pour une classification rationelle des Fungi imperfecti, Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire Séances de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 150: 882–884.Google Scholar
  86. Vuillemin, P., 1910b, Les conidiosporés, Bulletin de la Société des Sciences de Nancy 2: 129–172.Google Scholar
  87. Vuillemin, P., 1911, Les aleuriosporés, Bulletin de la Société des Sciences de Nancy 3: 151–172.Google Scholar
  88. Warcup, J.H., and P.H.B. Talbot, 1989, Muciturbo: a new genus of hypogeous ectomycorrhizal ascomycetes, Mycological Research 92: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weiss, F., 1940, Ovulinia, a new generic segregate from Sclerotiia, Phytopathology 30: 236–244.Google Scholar
  90. Whetzel, H.H., 1937, Septotinia, a new genus of the Ciborioideae, Mycologia 29: 128–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whetzel, H.H., 1945, A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate discomycetes, Mycologia 37: 648–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson, M., M. Noble, and E. Gray, 1954, Gloeotinia — a new genus of the Sclerotiniaceae, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 37: 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. C. Sutton
    • 1
  • G. L. Hennebert
    • 2
  1. 1.International Mycological InstituteEgham, SurreyUK
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mycologie Systématique et Appliquée Université Catholique de Louvain, Faculté des Sciences AgronomiquesMycothèque de L’Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations