Advertisement

Developmental Morphology of the “Zwischengruppe” between Ascohymeniales and Ascoloculares

  • A. Henssen
  • G. Thor
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 269)

Summary

Characteristic features of the “Zwischengruppe”, the Arthoniales s.l., are the ascohymenial ascocarp ontogeny and fissitunicate asci. The asci have a thick exotunica and a thin, expanding, hemiamyloid endotunica with an apical amyloid structure. The ascocarps are apothecioid, lirelliform, or in some genera stromatic. They develop gradually from a generative tissue that includes ± bent ascogonia ending in a trichogyne. The hamathecium consists of paraphysoids, and the exciple is annular and rudimentary to cupular and carbonized. The ascocarp ontogeny is briefly discussed in the type species of Arthonia, Arthothelium, Opegrapha, and Roccellina, and more comprehensively in species of Melampylidium, Dichosporidium, and Erythrodecton. The developmental morphology of the “Zwischengruppe” is compared with that of Pleospora herbarum and Myriangium duriaei, members of the Ascoloculares s.str. with ± pseudoparenchymatous ascostromata. Diagnoses are provided for the new species Dichosporidium latisporum Thor & Henssen and Melampylidium redonii Henssen. The new combination Melampylidium macrosporum (R.C. Harris) Henssen is made.

Keywords

Generative Tissue Developmental Morphology Ascogenous Hypha Opus Botanica Young Ascus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corlett, M., 1973, Observations and comments on the Pleospora centrum type, Nova Hedwigia 24: 347–366.Google Scholar
  2. Egea, J.M. and P. Torrente, 1993, The lichen genus Bactrospora, Lichenologist 25: 211–255.Google Scholar
  3. Eriksson, O. [E.], 1981, The families of bitunicate ascomycetes. Opera Botanica 60: 1–220.Google Scholar
  4. Eriksson, O.E. and D.L. Hawksworth, 1988, Outline of the ascomycetes — 1988, Systema Ascomycetum 1: 119–315.Google Scholar
  5. Harris, R.C., 1990, Some Florida Lichens. R.C. Harris, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Henssen, A., 1976, Studies in the developmental morphology of lichenized ascomycetes, In: Lichenology: Progress and Problems (D.H. Brown, D.L. Hawksworth and R.H. Bailey, eds): 107–138. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Henssen, A., 1987, Lichenothelia, a genus of microfungi on rocks, Bibliotheca Lichenologica 25: 257–293.Google Scholar
  8. Henssen, A., 1994, Studies on the biology and structure of Dacampia (Dothideales), a genus with lichenized and lichenicolous species, Cryptogamic Botany: in press.Google Scholar
  9. Henssen, A. and H.M. Jahns, 1973 [“1974”] Lichenes, eine Einführung in die Flechtenkunde, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  10. Henssen, A. (in cooperation with G. Keuck, B. Renner and G. Vobis), 1981, The lecanoralean centrum, In: Ascomycetes Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept (D.R. Reynolds, ed.): 138–234, Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luttrell, E.S., 1951, Taxonomy of the pyrenomycetes, University of Missouri Studies 24: 1–120.Google Scholar
  12. Luttrell, E.S., 1955, The ascostromatic ascomycetes, Mycologia 47: 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luttrell, E.S., 1965, Paraphysoids, pseudoparaphyses and apical paraphyses, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 48: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luttrell, E.S., 1973, Loculoascomycetes, In: The Fungi, Vol. IV A (G.C. Ainsworth, G.C. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman, eds): 135–219. Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London.Google Scholar
  15. Luttrell, E.S., 1981, The pyrenomycete centrum-Loculoascomycetes, In: Ascomycete Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept (D.R. Reynolds, ed.): 124–137. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nannfeldt, J.A., 1932, Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten, Nova Acta Regiae Societas Scientarum Upsaliensis, ser. 4, 8(2): 1–368.Google Scholar
  17. Parguey-Leduc, A., 1966, Recherches sur l’ontogénie et l’anatomie comparée des ascocarpes des pyrénomycètes ascoloculaires, Annales des Sciences Naturelle, Botanique, sér. 12, 7: 505–690.Google Scholar
  18. Redon, J. and G. Follmann, 1972, Beobachtungen zur Verbreitung chilenischer Flechten VI, Revision einiger Arten der Krustenflechtenfamilie Lecanactidaceae, Philippia 1/4: 186–193.Google Scholar
  19. Tehler, A., 1990, A new approach to the phylogeny of Euascornycetes with a cladistic outline of Arthoniales focussing on Roccellaceae, Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2458–2492.Google Scholar
  20. Thor, G., 1990, The lichen genus Chiodecton and five allied genera, Opera Botanica 103: 1–92.Google Scholar
  21. Thor, G., 1992, Erythrodecton kurzii, comb. nov., Nordic Journal of Botany 12: 733–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Henssen
    • 1
  • G. Thor
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich BiologiePhilipps-UniversitätMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Institutionen för ekologi och miljövårdSveriges LantbruksuniversitetUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations