Skip to main content

Cladistic Analysis in Ascomycete Systematics: Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Ascomycete Systematics

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSA,volume 269))

Summary

The theory and principle of cladistic methodology are summarized, and exemplified by applied cladistics in ascomycete systematics and classifications. General topics touched upon are: competing systematic methods, monophyly, paraphyly, terminal taxa, character coding, ingroup, outgroup, character polarization, parsimony, character weighting, equally parsimonious trees, problems with tree instability, consensus trees, and classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderberg, A., and A. Tehler, 1990, Consensus trees, a taxonomic necessity, Cladistics 6: 399–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbee, M., and J.W. Taylor, 1992, Convergent ascospore dispersal among pyrenomycete fungi inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequence, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1988, The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction, Evolution 42: 795–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, T.D., R. Vilgalys, S.M. Barns, D. Gonzalez, D.S. Hibett, J.D. Lane, L. Simon, S. Stickel, T.M. Szaro, W.G. Weisburg, and M.L. Sogin, 1992, Evolutionary relationships within the fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 231–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, T.D., T.J. White, and J.W. Taylor, 1991, Fungal molecular systematics, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 525–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camin, J.H., and R.R. Sokal, 1965, A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny, Evolution 19: 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J.M., 1988, Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms, Cladistics 4: 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M.J., R.G. Olmstead, J.F. Smith, and J.D. Palmer, 1992, Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL. sequences, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D., and P. Cranston, 1991, Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone?, Cladistics 7: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S., 1970, Methods for computing Wagner trees, Systematic Zoology 19: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S., 1977, Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo’s law, Systematic Zoology 26: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S., 1983, The logical basis for phylogenetic analysis. In: Advances in Cladistics (N. Platnick and V. Funk, eds). Colombia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S., 1988, Hennig86, Version 1.5. Computer Program and Reference Manual, Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985, Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap, Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W.M., 1971, Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specified tree topology, Systematic Zoology 20: 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forey, P.L., C.J. Humphries, I.J. Kitching, R.W. Scotland, D.J. Siebert, and D.M. Williams, 1992, Cladistics. A Practical Course in Systematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargas, A., and J.W. Taylor, 1992, Molecular systematics of lichenized and non-lichenized fungi based on rDNA sequences. In: Second International Symposium IAL 2. Abstracts (I. Käraefelt, ed.). Lunds Universitet, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, B., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics. [transi. D.D. Davis and R. Zangerl.] University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D.M., 1991, Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In: Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences (M.M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds): 278–294. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L., 1989, The evolution of phylogenetic systematics. In: The Hierarchy of Life (B. Fernholm, K. Bremer and H. Jornvall, eds). Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Källersjö, M., S.M. Farris, A.G. Kluge, and C. Bult, 1992, Skewness and permutation, Cladistics 8: 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W.P., and D.R. Maddison, 1992, MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich, M.F., and J.S. Farris, 1981, The implications of congruence in Menidia, Systematic Zoology 30: 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., and N. Platnick, 1981, Systematics and Biogeography, Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L., 1991, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.0, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1988, A cladistic outline of the Eumycota, Cladistics 4: 227–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1990, A new approach to the phylogeny of Euascomycetes with a cladistic outline of Arthoniales focussing on Roccellaceae, Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2458–2492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1993a, Schismatomma and three new or reinstated genera, a reassessment of generic relationships in Arthoniales, Cryptogamic Botany 3: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1993b, The genus Schismatomma (Arthoniales, Euascornycetidae), Opera Botanica: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1993c, The genus Sigridea (Roccellaceae, Arthoniales, Euascomycetidae), Nova Hedwigia: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehler, A., 1994, Arthoniales phylogeny as indicated by morphological and rDNA sequence data. Cryptogamic Botany: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous, L.E., and Q.D. Wheeler, 1981, The outgroup comparison method of character analysis, Systematic Zoology 30: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tehler, A. (1994). Cladistic Analysis in Ascomycete Systematics: Theory and Practice. In: Hawksworth, D.L. (eds) Ascomycete Systematics. NATO ASI Series, vol 269. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9290-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9290-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9292-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9290-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics