A Crystalline Torelli Theorem for Supersingular K3 Surfaces

  • Arthur Ogus
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 36)


I like to argue that crystalline cohomology will play a role in characteristic p analogous to the role of Ilodge theory in characteristic zero. One aspect of this analogy is that the F-crystal structure on crystalline cohomology should reflect deep geometric properties of varieties. This should be especially true of varieties for which the “p-adic part” of their geometry is the most interesting, as seems, often to be true of supersingular varieties in the sense of Shioda [26]. For example, in [19 §6] I proved that supersingular abelian varieties of dimension at least two are determined up to isomorphism by the F-crystal structure (and trace map) on H cris 1 , just as abelian varieties over ℂ are determined by the Ilodge structure on H DR 1 .


Spectral Sequence Finite Type Ample Line Bundle Algebraic Space Kummer Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Artin, M. “The implicit function theorem in algebraic geometry,” Algebraic Geometry (Int. Coll. at Tasta, 1968), Oxford University Press, 1969, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Artin, M. “Algebrization of formal moduli, I,” in Global Analysis (Spencer and Iyanaga, eds.), Princeton Math. Studies No. 29, Princeton University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Artin, M. “Algebrization of formal moduli, II,” Annals of Math. 91, 1970, pp. 88–135.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Supersingular K3 surfaces,” Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 7, 1974, pp. 543–568.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Berthelot, P. and Ogus, A. “F-crystals and DeRham cohomology, I,” (to appear in Inv. Math.)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bloch, S., Caber, O., and Kato, K. (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Burns, D. and Rapoport M. “On the Torelli problem for Kählerian K3 surfaces,” Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 8, 1975, pp. 235–273.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Deligne, P. Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique 41/2, Springer- Verlag LNM 569, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Grothendieck, A. “Éléments de Géométrie Algébrique, III,” Publ. Math. de l’1.1I.E.S. 11, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique 1,Springer-Verlag LNM 224, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Katz, N. “Slope filtration of F-crystals,” Astérisque 63, 1979, pp. 113–164.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Koblitz, N. “P-adic variation of the zeta function…” Comp. Math. 31, 1975, pp. 119–218.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lang, W. and Nygaard, N. “A short proof of Rudakov Shafarevich theorem,” Math. Ann. 251, 1980, pp. 171–173.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Matsusaka, T. and Mumford, D. “Two fundamental theorems on deformations of polarized algebraic varieties,” Amer. J. Math. 86, 1964, pp. 668-Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Milnor, J. and Stasheff, J. Characteristic Classes, Annals of Math. Study No. 76, Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Morrison, D. “Some remarks on the moduli of K3 surfaces,” (to appear).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Nygaard, N. “The Tate conjecture for ordinary K3 surfaces over finite fields,” (to appear in Inv. Math.)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Nygaard, N. “The Torelli theorem for ordinary K3 surfaces over finite fields,” (this volume).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Ogus, A. “Supersingular K3 crystals,” Asterisque 64, 1979, pp. 3–86.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ogus, A. “Hodge cycles and crystalline cohomology,” in Hodge Cycles, Motives and Shimura Varieties, Springer-Verlag LNM 900, 1982, pp. 357–414.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Piatetski-Shapiro, I. and Shafarevich, I. “A Torelli theorem for surfaces of type K3,” Math. USSR-Izv. 5, 1971, pp. 547–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rudakov, A. and Shafarevich, I. “Inseparable morphisms of algebraic surfaces,” Math. USSR-Izv. 10, 1976, pp. 1205–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Rudakov, A. and Shafarevich, I. “Degeneration of K3 surfaces over fields of finite characteristic,” (preprint).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Rudakov, A. and Shafarevich, I. “K3 surfaces over fields of finite characteristic,” in Modern Problems in Math., Vol. 18, 1981, Itogi Nauk Tekh., Acad. of Sci. USSR [Russian].Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Serre, J. P. A Course in Arithmetic, Springer-Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Shioda, T. “On unirationality of supersingular varieties,” Math. Ann. 225, 1977, pp. 155–159.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Ogus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations